Why would I listen to the "experts" who are saying they don't expect a proper recount to change a

[zonkers]

thing, especially in PA? If there is one lesson from 2016, it's screw the experts. There get things wrong like everybody else.

[Tiggeroshii]

1. Realistically though, it is about as likely to change as Trump winning on election day.

...

[jodymarie aimee]

2. they threw out 5000 fake Trump votes last Weds nite in WI

changing his lead from 27,000 to 22,000...so yeah, I'm with Zonkers on this. We got grift here that I can tell you.

[Madam45for2923]

3. Yep! With you too!

[MineralMan]

4. Because they have seen recounts in action?

Plus, your definition of what a "proper recount" is may not be how the recounts are done. For example, in PA, most voting is done on voting machines that have no paper trail, making a hand recount impossible. There's no real recount done. They just do the same count again that they did before.

In WI, unless they hand count, they'll just run the same paper ballots through the same machines they used before in each county. A hand recount takes a long time and would probably not be done before the electoral college votes.

The experts are experts because they're familiar with the process, unlike most of the rest of us.