Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
1. Well, yeah; but it isn't going to go unless there is a Constitutional amendment.
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 01:20 PM
Dec 2016

That has to go through Congress, controlled by the GOP, which will not want to give up the EC because it gives greater weight to rural, conservative states.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
6. Yes, it is. The electoral college and the procedures it uses
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 08:43 PM
Dec 2016

are specifically set out in the Constitution, Article II, section 1. We're stuck with them unless the Constitution is amended.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
7. I have studied it, and you are incorrect..sorry
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 08:46 PM
Dec 2016

I do not want to argue with you..

Especially since this PE is going to walk all over the constitution

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
8. There is a way to work around the EC
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 09:01 PM
Dec 2016

if enough states sign on, but absent a Constitutional amendment, there is no way to get rid of it.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
14. I'm not incorrect.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 12:37 AM
Dec 2016

I used to teach constitutional law (it was a long time ago but the constitution hasn't changed since then), so I think I have a pretty good idea what I'm talking about. The problem with the proposed solution is that it depends on the states to agree to it, and even if they did, in the absence of a constitutional amendment the states can change their minds and rescind their agreements. And there's absolutely no incentive for the rural small-population states, which under the current electoral college system get more votes per their population than the large, heavily-populated states, to agree to something that would in effect take power away from them.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
11. This election was a wake-up call to Republicans.
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 09:44 PM
Dec 2016

It opened their eyes to the fact that with massive populations of Democrats in California and New York, they'll probably never be able to win the national popular vote again.

Expect them to defend the Electoral College now more than ever.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. In spite of the naysayers, we should at least try
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 01:22 PM
Dec 2016

I'm from a state where my vote weighs too heavily and I'm for doing away with it.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
13. "The Electoral College must go."
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 11:02 PM
Dec 2016

I disagree. Besides it being impracticable to overturn, I dont fully agree that CA and NY should decide the POTUS, and that small states should have no weight.

Thw EC is telling us something: That we need candidates and messaging with broader appeal. If we tune our message to support all working people, well be fine.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Never Again...