Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 11:33 AM Dec 2016

The Republican Sabotage of the Vote Recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin

Last edited Mon Dec 19, 2016, 01:39 PM - Edit history (1)

The Republican Sabotage of the Vote Recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin
Saturday, 17 December 2016 | Greg Palast, Truthout | Report

Michigan officials declared in late November that Trump won the state's count by 10,704 votes. But hold on -- a record 75,355 ballots were not counted.

The uncounted ballots came mostly from Detroit and Flint, majority-Black cities that vote Democratic.

According to the machines that read their ballots, these voters waited in line, sometimes for hours, yet did not choose a president. Really?

This week, I drove through a snowstorm to Lansing to hear the official explanation from Ruth Johnson, the Republican secretary of state. I was directed to official flack-catcher Fred Woodhams who told me, "You know, I think when you look at the unfavorability ratings that were reported for both major-party candidates, it's probably not that surprising."

Sleuthing about in Detroit, I found another explanation: bubbles.

Bubbles?

Michigan votes on paper ballots. If you don't fill the bubble completely, the machine records that you didn't vote for president. ....................


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Republican Sabotage of the Vote Recounts in Michigan and Wisconsin (Original Post) Coyotl Dec 2016 OP
I saw reports that there were quite a few Bernie write ins MichMan Dec 2016 #1
It's a damn tragedy Abouttime Dec 2016 #2
Bubbles DK504 Dec 2016 #3
A well planned coup libtodeath Dec 2016 #4
K&R red dog 1 Dec 2016 #5
knr triron Dec 2016 #6
The current FUD on DU is this election was legit enough, these are peripheral matters that would uponit7771 Dec 2016 #7
So the voters somehow filled in the bubbles on the other races correctly mythology Dec 2016 #8
knr triron Dec 2016 #9
Yep a tragedy and I am OUTRAGED that MI could assert their election results w/o counting 75K n/t iluvtennis Dec 2016 #10
It's official. Orsino Dec 2016 #11
Orders from above. Coyotl Dec 2016 #12

MichMan

(11,910 posts)
1. I saw reports that there were quite a few Bernie write ins
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 12:08 PM
Dec 2016

Michigan also only counts write in votes for candidates that were pre certified as write in candidates.

There were several from fringe candidates, but from reports I saw from recount observers, there were a sizable number of write in votes for Bernie that were counted as no votes. That also meant that votes for Elvis, Mickey Mouse, Oprah, Kim Kardashian, or Beyoncé were also not recorded as voting for president either.

While not filling in the bubble correctly could be problematic, it isn't correct to say the vast majority of those came from Detroit & Flint. There would be no logical explanation why a particular area of the state would be more predisposed to fill in the ballot incorrectly.

The bigger issue in Detroit was the systemic failure of the City and County election officials. There were 59% of precincts that had errors between the poll books and the tabulated results from the scanners. There were also 95 poll books that were turned in either days later or not at all. These were supposed to be included with the ballots in sealed containers the night of the election. In most instances the numbers were only off by a couple here and there, but there were others that had ballots left in the machines and not turned in. The state is investigating and at this time the issue seems to have been caused by poorly trained and supervised election workers.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/15/records-detroit-poll-books-missing-several-days/95476742/

http://www.freep.com/story/news/columnists/rochelle-riley/2016/12/16/riley-supervisor-poll-workers-not-capable-job/95495230/

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/records-many-votes-detroits-precincts/95363314/





 

Abouttime

(675 posts)
2. It's a damn tragedy
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 12:26 PM
Dec 2016

Hillary won MI, PA, FL and most likely WI but who was counting the votes mattered more than the actual votes. The exit polls were right, the popular vote was right, HRC is the rightful winner of the 2016 election.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
5. K&R
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 09:34 PM
Dec 2016

(From the OP)

Susan, a systems analyst who took part in the hand recount initiated by Jill Stein, told me, "I saw a lot of red ink..I saw a lot of checkmarks..We saw a lot of ballots that weren't originally counted, because those don't scan into the machine." (I can only use her first name because she's terrified of retribution from Trump followers in the white suburb where she lives)

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
7. The current FUD on DU is this election was legit enough, these are peripheral matters that would
Sun Dec 18, 2016, 09:53 PM
Dec 2016

... get people put in jail!!!

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
8. So the voters somehow filled in the bubbles on the other races correctly
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 12:15 AM
Dec 2016

but screwed it up on just the presidential race? Perhaps there's another more logical explanation as was mentioned by another poster that votes for write in candidates who aren't officially recognized aren't counted?

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
11. It's official.
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 01:34 PM
Dec 2016

The state governments now recognize no mandate to read the intent of the voter, but only to obey the machines.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Republican Sabotage o...