2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBased on CBS 60 Minutes "Are Robots Hurting Job Growth"
It might be important to consider levying a robot tax that is assigned to Social Security and Medicare. A higher tax if the robots are used in another country. As long as those robots reduce availability of jobs in the USA there needs to revenue to offset the loss.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)how does an economy function in the 21st century.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Technology has, and will continue to, replace many jobs. Our economic structure has to change to maintain some reasonable quality of life for those displaced. It's one thing when jobs are available. It's another, when there just aren't reasonable jobs for those who want them.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)going to be some herculean task. A society for the many just can not eventually function with the wealth and buying power cornered by a few percent. It will eventually collapse.
Well stated. This is one of our core problems.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)made a lot of goods, but people had no cash to buy.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Socal31
(2,484 posts)Automation has also put a dent into "blue collar" human labor needs. China will eventually see the same thing.
Mopar151
(9,975 posts)spent Friday making special gripper fingers for a robot.
Thing is, "robots" are not solo performers. You don't take 'em out of the box and set them to work - there is tooling to mount (the "end effector" , work positioning devices, something to mount the robot to, and some pretty complex programming.
Thousands of hours go into building a "cell" like this
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)who do these companies think are going to buy their products? Further erosion of the working class which happens to be the engine behind a healthy economy. Remember the Henry Ford school of thought? I want to pay my workers enough so that they can afford to buy my cars. Corporations are so ignorantly short sighted.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)60 years old and very prescient.
WestCoastLib
(442 posts)But, it can cut into blue collar jobs, as they were defined in the 20th century.
Of course moving forward what it means to be blue collar will change as well. Your general, run of the mill, IT/Technical Support people was thought of as a high end job in the 80's and 90's, but really fits the mold of blue collar now, in terms of relative education and pay scale. And these jobs are always in high demand and getting more so, as many industries that last century had no need to hire any "tech people" find themselves with growing computer needs.
It hurts most, those people caught in between, of course. Aging in the job market with little need to develop computer skills until recently. The kind of people that have their kids troubleshoot their computers for them at home.