Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YayArea

(71 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 03:33 AM Jan 2013

New poll - bad news for GOP

Favorability Index
(2VP + SP - SN - 2VN)

DEM
Hillary Clinton: +52
Barack Obama: +20
John Kerry: +5
Democratic Party: +4
Joe Biden: +3
Harry Reid: -26
Nancy Pelosi: -30

GOP
Mitch McConnell: -22 (but a-lot of "never heard of&quot
John Boehner: -35
Republican Party: -44
Tea Party: -47

LINK
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/13018_JANUARY_NBC-WSJ.pdf

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New poll - bad news for GOP (Original Post) YayArea Jan 2013 OP
I'll accept that! defacto7 Jan 2013 #1
Uh oh the skewed numbers guy is going to be very busy Kalidurga Jan 2013 #2
Wow! The House is all the way up to 15 approval rating. lindysalsagal Jan 2013 #3
Wow, Hillary to the moon flamingdem Jan 2013 #4
I like this poll's results. In_The_Wind Jan 2013 #5
Good God, you nearly gave me a heart attack... FleetwoodMac Jan 2013 #6
The difference is that the OP was double-weighting the "strongly positive" and "strongly negative" Jim Lane Jan 2013 #9
Huh? The OP probably just misquoted the numbers from the original article FleetwoodMac Jan 2013 #10
No, the OP was just using a different part of the original article Jim Lane Jan 2013 #12
Good numbers but do we do with them? LukeFL Jan 2013 #7
kick Liberal_in_LA Jan 2013 #8
LOL! Dawson Leery Jan 2013 #11
These polls mean nothing because they were taken as a National poll of the rethugs bigdarryl Jan 2013 #13
No surprise here Presidentcokedupfratboy Jan 2013 #14

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
2. Uh oh the skewed numbers guy is going to be very busy
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 04:14 AM
Jan 2013

He might bust a circuit trying to unskew those numbers.

lindysalsagal

(20,648 posts)
3. Wow! The House is all the way up to 15 approval rating.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 04:29 AM
Jan 2013

I believe that's a 6 point rally!

WooHooo! You go, House!

FleetwoodMac

(351 posts)
6. Good God, you nearly gave me a heart attack...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 06:59 AM
Jan 2013

with that 48 points favorability gap between the Democrats and the GOP!!!
lol. I wished it was so, but it is actually 18 points for the GOP - a 29 points absolute gap. Still significant, of course.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
9. The difference is that the OP was double-weighting the "strongly positive" and "strongly negative"
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 04:27 AM
Jan 2013

The table you present doesn't make any distinction; it lumps together all the positives, whatever the intensity, and all the negatives.

If accounting for intensity takes the Dems from +29 to +40, that tells us that there is greater strength of feeling among those who are pro-Democratic and/or anti-Republican than there is among those on the opposite side. That's an interesting result. I would have guessed that the fanatical Tea Party types would have contributed enough "strongly" responses so that such a weighting would make the Republicans look better, not worse.

FleetwoodMac

(351 posts)
10. Huh? The OP probably just misquoted the numbers from the original article
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:48 PM
Jan 2013

The table I presented totaled up the "Very Positive" and "Somewhat Positive," and it was meant to provide a clearer picture.
You could view the breakdown, as well as the referred table, from the survey result linked in the OP. Though I still don't see how you reached +40.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
12. No, the OP was just using a different part of the original article
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:07 AM
Jan 2013

You're correct that you used the table (from page 12) that summarized Question 8 by lumping together the "Very Positive" and the "Somewhat Positive".

The OP clearly stated that it was reporting a different number:

"Favorability Index
(2VP + SP - SN - 2VN)"

In other words, the OP used numbers (derived from the detailed data of that same Question 8, on pages 6 through 11) that gave greater weight to more intense feelings.

As for +40, that was an error on my part, thanks for the catch. I meant to quote FleetwoodMac in #6, who stated the difference between the parties (using the OP's "Favorability Index&quot as +48, because the OP had Democrats at +4 and Republicans at -44.

BUT on further review it seems to me that the OP made a mistake in that calculation. The numbers (VP, SP, SN, VN) for each party are:
Democrats: 17 27 19 19 (from page 7)
Republicans: 6 20 24 25 (from page 8)

By my calculations, the Democrats are indeed at +4, but the Republicans are at -42, not -44, so the gap is 46 points, not 48.

So I was incorrectly quoting FleetwoodMac, who correctly used the OP's numbers in calculating the +48 but who was therefore using one number (the -44) that the OP had calculated incorrectly in deriving it from the source. Ya got that?

To me, the surprising thing is that the Republicans had only 6% giving them "Very Positive" ratings. I would've thought that there were more Tea Partiers who would ardently praise the Republicans for obstructing Obama. Maybe some of them went with only "Somewhat Positive" because they don't think the Republicans have been obstructive enough.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
11. LOL!
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:06 PM
Jan 2013

The Koch brothers plan to get a bunch of reactionary kooks in the streets (teaklan) isn't working out so well.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
13. These polls mean nothing because they were taken as a National poll of the rethugs
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jan 2013

If you go district to district these guys UNFORTUNATELY!!! are very popular and 99.9% of the people in those districts are republicans .That's what gerrymandering the system gets you and by the way this is there plan also to gerrymander the Presidential elections also

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New poll - bad news for G...