2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGingrich: Obama ‘potentially’ allowing Syria’s ‘virus’ to infect the U.S.
By David Edwards
Sunday, January 20, 2013 14:10 EST
Former Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich says that President Barack Obamas policies are allowing a worldwide virus of terrorism from places like North Africa and Syria to destabilize the planet and potentially infect Europe and the United States.
Gingrich on Sunday told CNNs Candy Crowley that a recent hostage crisis at a gas plant in Algeria was evidence that terrorism was more like a virus than Whac-A-Mole.
I think we havent had any honest epidemiology, he explained. Were trying to hunt down 5,000 people in al Qaeda, there is a potential pool of 65 to 100 million recruits Theyre spreading across the whole planet, from the Philippines to, frankly, the United States. And I think we greatly underestimate how many places youre going to have trouble in the next decade.
We talk about the Iranian potential nuclear weapon, Pakistan is probably building more nuclear weapons than any other country in the world right now, he continued. Pakistan is a very fragile system which could disintegrate at any time. Were not prepared for that. The whole challenge of the Persian Gulf, were not prepared for that. The level of violence in Syria.
-snip-
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1yHYq)
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)on his inaguration day is a bit low.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)It highlights how unhinged the opposition really is.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)themselves then, on this day of days.
LeftInTX
(25,255 posts)Blah, blah, blah
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)But color me confused, aren't we supposed to be in favor of toppling evile dictators like Assad? So what virus is that asshat talking about, the democracy virus? Yah I could see how that would be a threat to the tiny slice of people at the top of our plutocracy.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)and the hostages, if we and the uk went in there and handled that rescue we would have had a better outcome.
But noooo congress won't even let the usa assist France against the attacking al Qaeda..they would rather have old Gingrich whine on TV about the 'spreading threat.'
Paladin
(28,252 posts)agentS
(1,325 posts)What he gets wrong is the religious beliefs and race of the threat.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_01/can_patriots_be_terrorists042490.php
In other words- Gingrich's very strong supporters are the threat.
It says anti-federalists espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.
The report also draws a link between the mainstream conservative movement and the violent far right, and describes liberals as future oriented and conservatives as living in the past.
I think the GOP and the Koch brothers are as much of a threat to the safety and security of the US as the AL-Qaeda factions around the world.
flying-skeleton
(696 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)That's why he claims Kerry and Hagel are "minimalist", and don't have a "positive vision" for "dealing with a worldwide virus". He wants huge spending on the military, and 'security' - both 'homeland' and CIA amd Blackwater-style stuff abroad - that's what he sees as 'positive'.