Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 11:18 PM Jan 2013

Senate Democrats Back Away From Rules Changes To End Minority Delay Tactics

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Senate on Thursday backed away from rules changes that would have scrapped or vastly limited the filibuster, a long-standing technique that allows just one of the chamber's 100 members to block legislation.

Under Senate rules, which were changed only slightly in the agreement reached between leaders of the Republican minority and the Democrat majority, filibustered legislation can be brought to a vote only if it has the backing of a super majority — 60 of the chamber's 100 members.

--CLIP
The rules deal accepted in the Senate on Thursday, leaves the minority party with far more power than it has in the House, where procedures allow a united majority party to muscle through its priorities.

--CLIP
Democrat Majority Leader Harry Reid had been under heavy pressure from liberals in the Senate to outlaw the filibuster under the rules of the coming session. Such a change would only have required 51 votes. Democrats currently control 55 votes. Reid had initially said he wanted to ban the filibuster.

MORE...

http://www.timescolonist.com/news/world/senate-democrats-back-away-from-rules-changes-to-end-minority-delay-tactics-1.55990

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats Back Away From Rules Changes To End Minority Delay Tactics (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2013 OP
Brave Sir Democrats MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #1
but wasn't it all a great show?! fascisthunter Jan 2013 #2
Carnival 'barkers' and all... Purveyor Jan 2013 #3
Because they could be in the minority in 2014 given that many represent RED Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #4
Michigan included so I guess we just f'n surrender now and get it over with, eh? Perhaps they Purveyor Jan 2013 #5
Not really. We try hard to do the best we can to save those seats, but the reality is there. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #6
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
5. Michigan included so I guess we just f'n surrender now and get it over with, eh? Perhaps they
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:31 AM
Jan 2013

will be 'nice to us' post 2014 if we are nice to them now?

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
6. Not really. We try hard to do the best we can to save those seats, but the reality is there.
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:54 AM
Jan 2013

You got Democrats representing the reddest states up for reelection in 2014. We shouldn't be naive about the likely outcome. We got lucky last time with crazy ass Republicans making ridiculous statements about rape and women. I don't think we'll be so lucky in a midterm election.

Call Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer's line. Demand answers for why they opposed filibuster reform.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Senate Democrats Back Awa...