Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:13 PM Jan 2012

I wouldn't be at all surprised if Mitt dropped out of the race. Hear me out...

I truly doubt he will win South Carolina. He is really having problems coming to grips with showing his income tax returns, his numbers are dropping like rain and his demeanor is that of a tired and cranky middle-aged man. He is not used to being questioned about his money, his integrity or any of the other questions that pop up. How dare these people delve into my privacy. He is stiff/awkward and looks to be very uncomfortable the longer this parade goes on.

I know he's been readying for this for years, but now that he's in it I just don't think he's liking it very much. I truly doubt his numbers are going to improve. I do think the party will end up with Santorum or it will go to convention, and Romney will lose there also IMO. He's a guy who works with numbers and odds all of the time. This should be a no-brainer for him, get out at least with some shred of dignity. I could be wrong on this of course, but when he tires of something he gets rid of it. He should think in those terms about his campaign...

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Mitt dropped out of the race. Hear me out... (Original Post) monmouth Jan 2012 OP
Could be...I get the feeling the party establishment is preparing Mitch Daniels to step in, maybe blm Jan 2012 #1
Daniels is an Arab. He would have no chance of being the nominee. provis99 Jan 2012 #11
Daniels family were Christian refugees from Syria grantcart Jan 2012 #13
... and he's also about to be subpoenaed to testify ... Myrina Feb 2012 #32
I would guess Daniels/McDonnell grantcart Jan 2012 #14
Daniels has inescapable ties to Bush -- his budget director Bake Feb 2012 #39
Funny I was thinking he may drop out. After all why should he stay in when he can live on his southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #2
I just don't see him leaving. He has the money and the ego. morningfog Jan 2012 #3
Correct. He stays in: Money and ego. n/t FSogol Jan 2012 #5
I don't know how these candidates do it, honestly. This schedule is grueling..n/t monmouth Jan 2012 #6
Nail, meet hammer. FedUp_Queer Feb 2012 #31
What's he really hiding? aaaaaa5a Jan 2012 #4
He still has the best organization ("ground game") of all of the candidates Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2012 #7
If he woke up one morning and the calculations came out wrong he'd drop out. pa28 Jan 2012 #8
Actually, "expert" investors often perform below chance Jackpine Radical Jan 2012 #10
But would he be losing his money or other peoples? A Simple Game Jan 2012 #18
Mittens is obsessed with being president nevergiveup Jan 2012 #9
Mitt is also obsessed with being president because he wants grantcart Jan 2012 #15
Mitt may also be obsessed by fulfilling his father's dream. amandabeech Feb 2012 #27
His father was actually a great guy, both a good politician and a public figure who had a relaxed grantcart Feb 2012 #28
Ahh, just what we need: another "Bush" candidate trying to live up to his Daddy. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2012 #30
Pres. Obama and fmr. Pres. Clinton had a different, but problematic, situation with their Dads. amandabeech Feb 2012 #34
This is pretty much the last chance for 3 of them to be president TlalocW Jan 2012 #12
He was stuttering a LOT in the debate last night XemaSab Jan 2012 #16
at some point he will perhaps realize quaker bill Jan 2012 #17
Not a chance. He'll spend 60 million of his own money Thrill Jan 2012 #19
I think your underestimate his investment in the "business" of running for president.... Rowdyboy Jan 2012 #20
I tend to agree with you davidpdx Jan 2012 #24
Maybe--there has to be something more in those tax returns than just a low tax rate. bklyncowgirl Jan 2012 #21
Nothing the GOPers do surprise me anymore now,I thought Cain would've dropped out sooner than he did Tx4obama Jan 2012 #22
It would not only be surprising if Romney dropped out, it would be shocking onenote Jan 2012 #23
I think things will have to get much worse for Romney to drop out davidpdx Jan 2012 #25
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #26
The problem is that he owes the Republican Establishment and his corporate benefactors. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2012 #29
I just don't see Mitt as the type of guy who really WANTS a job. Myrina Feb 2012 #33
Not a chance. Moondog Feb 2012 #35
PPP National Poll: Romney collapsing, Santorum surging with + 15 point lead. grantcart Feb 2012 #36
I hope you're right. Moondog Feb 2012 #37
No way. Mitt is in it until the bitter end. Marsala Feb 2012 #38
He is still the odds on favorite Cosmocat Feb 2012 #40

blm

(113,040 posts)
1. Could be...I get the feeling the party establishment is preparing Mitch Daniels to step in, maybe
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jan 2012

a brokered convention. They never expected to win, just keep focused on what will best get Jeb in the driver's seat for 2016. I think they like Huntsman or Daniels for VP, and would like to see them get national seasoning and exposure.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
13. Daniels family were Christian refugees from Syria
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 09:27 PM
Jan 2012

and he is a practiciing Presbyterian.

Evangelicals would love to embrace somebody whose family kept their faith under adverse circumstances and came to America to live in religious freedom.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
32. ... and he's also about to be subpoenaed to testify ...
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 05:54 PM
Feb 2012

... in the state's bamboozling of the attempt to privatize Social Services to IBM, and then weasel out on a $10B contract.

In addition to other things he may have to testify on, like campaign contributions from a scumbag indicted on federal ponzi charges (who's name escapes me at the moment).

Little Napoleon Combover's closet is full of stuff that's going to keep him far from the scrutiny of the GOP Nomination.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
39. Daniels has inescapable ties to Bush -- his budget director
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 11:06 AM
Feb 2012

And Lord knows the Repigs don't want ANY mention of Bushie Boy.

Bake

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
2. Funny I was thinking he may drop out. After all why should he stay in when he can live on his
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jan 2012

millions. But lets say this much Sandy and Newty haven't got a chance next to Obama.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
3. I just don't see him leaving. He has the money and the ego.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jan 2012

Newt, Paul and Santorum have a had calender ahead. FL in 10 days, then Maine, Nevada, Colorado, Minnesota, Arizona, Michigan. It won't be back to southern states until Super Tuesday, March 6.

I think Newt and Paul will stay in it until at least then, and longer if they are splitting the ticket enough. But, I just don't see Romney dropping enough in other states to the point that he would even consider dropping out. Like I said in another thread, I would love to see a brokered convention, but will be happy with a long and bloody campaign, regardless of who the nominee turns out to be.

 

FedUp_Queer

(975 posts)
31. Nail, meet hammer.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:48 PM
Feb 2012

I was thinking that his ego is the reason. Remember...there is a "1% mentality" that they are entitled to things like the presidency (Romney, Bush) or the mayoralty (Bloomberg). They also believe they can alter reality like Romney (I've always been a "severe conservative&quot or Bush (I never said Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 9/11). After all, if they believe their own BS, why shouldn't us little people believe it?

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
4. What's he really hiding?
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:20 PM
Jan 2012


We already know about...


15% (or less/Taxes)

Cayman Island Bank Accounts

10% to the Mormon Church


He and his campaign have either turned a mole hill into a mountain or there is something more there. What could it be?

Oil futures?

Gambling/investing against the bailouts?

Overseas investments in Iran, China etc.

I don't get it.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,402 posts)
7. He still has the best organization ("ground game") of all of the candidates
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jan 2012

None of the other candidates AFAIK have the organization and/or money to take it all the way. I also seem to recall that despite McCain's frontrunner status and the inevitability that surrounded his campaign in 2007-2008, he did go through a rough patch for awhile where he fired/replaced most of his campaign staff and he had to face down a strong challenge from Huckabee. Romney has no real incentive to drop out of the race yet. He can (and probably will) "retool" his campaign and come back strong. He just may not have as clear and easy path to the nomination as he (and most establishment Republicans) believed he would. With Cain, Bachmann, and now Perry gone, the socially conservative "not- Romneys" have fewer candidates to be divided among as well.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
8. If he woke up one morning and the calculations came out wrong he'd drop out.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jan 2012

He was a successful investor for many years and you just can't do that if your ego interferes with your decision making process.

Romney might be a sociopath or an overly calculating automaton but he's not a fool. He's just got too much to lose and he's not going to risk it.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
10. Actually, "expert" investors often perform below chance
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 08:04 PM
Jan 2012

exactly because they base their decisions of emotional and ego-driven grounds.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
18. But would he be losing his money or other peoples?
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:05 PM
Jan 2012

I doubt that he cares if it is other peoples money.

nevergiveup

(4,759 posts)
9. Mittens is obsessed with being president
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:56 PM
Jan 2012

and this is his last shot. I believe the chances of him withdrawing, even if he loses S.C., are near zero.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
15. Mitt is also obsessed with being president because he wants
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 09:32 PM
Jan 2012

to be popular and to have his family and religion confirmed by 'America'. If it ends up embarassing him and turns into a gruelling month after month slug out I can see him giving up in a fit of impatience.

Last time he gave up rathe easily.

Moreover this year he isn't putting his own money into it like he did last time.
 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
27. Mitt may also be obsessed by fulfilling his father's dream.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 03:49 AM
Feb 2012

George Romney, governor of Michigan, was a serious presidential candidate in 1968. He left the campaign after he was beat up by the media for changing his position on Vietnam, saying that he had been brainwashed by the conservatives and military types.

Mitt and his dad got along, so we don't have a case of Mitt trying to outdo Daddy by getting Saddam, like we had with the Shrub. Rather, Mitt may be running to fulfill his father's dream. I would suspect that Mitt thinks the media treated his dad unfairly, and maybe they did. I have some memories of the elder Romney's run--I was a young, politically aware teen living with my family in Michigan at the time.

The elder Romney was a reasonable moderate Republican, and I think that if he had secured the Republican nomination instead of Nixon, and won, we would have had a better situation in the US then, which in my opinion means that we would have a better situation now. RFK or Humphrey would of course been superior, but compared to Nixon, Romney was a peach of a guy. Things that happened in the Nixon years still haunt our nation and our politics. The elder Romney's wife was a real old fashioned liberal Republican who favored choice, if you can believe that. Mitt really isn't up to his parents' standards.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
28. His father was actually a great guy, both a good politician and a public figure who had a relaxed
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:03 PM
Feb 2012

manner.

I would say agree that Mitt may be trying to live up to the expectations of his Father that he carries inside of him but that George probably never inflicted on MItt.

If so that would be the third Republican nominee, IMO, in a row to run for President because of 'Daddy' issues. It was obviously true with GB and also true, IMO with McCain who struggled at trying to out peforme his father's outstanding military career with a rather checkered military career before he redeemed himself with his courageous POW period which doesn't really compare in kind with being one of the highest ranking admirals in US history.
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
30. Ahh, just what we need: another "Bush" candidate trying to live up to his Daddy.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:45 PM
Feb 2012

These people scare me precisely due to their Daddy Issues. Dumbya took us to Iraq because he wanted to prove something to Daddy.

It's ridiculous!

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
34. Pres. Obama and fmr. Pres. Clinton had a different, but problematic, situation with their Dads.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:28 PM
Feb 2012

Obama's Dad was around for two years, and I believe Clinton's Dad died before he was born.

Both spent time with stepfathers, although Obama's seems to be more benign than Clinton's.

Obviously, his father's absence has been on Pres. Obama's mind very much. I've never read about whether Clinton mused about his father, but he ended up using a baseball bat to protect his Mom from his alcoholic stepfather.

I agree with you on Dumya, but I would like more Presidents to have reasonably ok childhoods. It might help all of us.

TlalocW

(15,379 posts)
12. This is pretty much the last chance for 3 of them to be president
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 09:09 PM
Jan 2012

For Mitt, it's ego-driven. For Newt, it's ego as well, but it's because he wants power so badly as he sees that as the best way to get people to admire him. For Ron, I actually give him the benefit of the doubt in that he honestly thinks his ideas are best, but he's too much of a kook.

Santorum might drop out depending on what states are up next, and for him it's about imposing his view of Christianity on America so he has the strength of that brand of insanity on his side.

It's going to be down to Mitt and Newt at least until Super Tuesday.

TlalocW

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
16. He was stuttering a LOT in the debate last night
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 09:55 PM
Jan 2012

I think he's lost the "appearing presidential" edge.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
17. at some point he will perhaps realize
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:02 PM
Jan 2012

that the republicans are just picking the best loser. They would like a loser who will cost them the least number of house seats. Mitt would be about the best for that. However, if he figures it out, he might decline.

Thrill

(19,178 posts)
19. Not a chance. He'll spend 60 million of his own money
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:30 PM
Jan 2012

before dropping out.

You'll have to drag him out kicking and screaming.

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
20. I think your underestimate his investment in the "business" of running for president....
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 01:05 AM
Jan 2012

In terms of time and money, Willard is "all-in", he's invested way too much of his life, money and credibility to back away now. He has the financial means and an enormous Mormon-based organization that assures him of being able to compete as long as he likes. I think he'll fight it out, if need be, until the convention and I think in the end he'll win the Republican nomination. Historically Republicans tend to be very predictable and he is the next in line. Its "Mitt's turn" and that is really good news for our side.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
24. I tend to agree with you
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:36 AM
Jan 2012

The Mormon Church has been putting out a pretty strong PR campaign and though there's no way to prove it, I'm convinced there has to be a connection.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
21. Maybe--there has to be something more in those tax returns than just a low tax rate.
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 06:40 AM
Jan 2012

The low tax rate was no surprise but I was a bit surprised that he'd still have his money in a notorious tax haven like the Caymans. You'd think his political advisors would have told him that no matter how intelligent an investment it was putting his cash in a place which Joe Six Pack and Soccer Mom associate with drug kingpins, tax cheats and con artists is bad news politically. Then there's the refusal to release his tax returns. Once again, SOP, for presidential candidate. He would have to know that if he got the nomination, Obama'd be waving his around like a boy scout. Why not? Because as Fitzgerald famously said (more or less) The rich are different than you and I.

Romney's an arrogant piece of work. I could see him fold up his tent and deprive the nation of his great mangerial and fincial skills rather than submit his finances for review by the great unwashed simply because he truly believes that it is none of our business.

Of course there could be other reasons. Along with members of the media hordes, Democratic operatives and Gingrich gnomes there could be other people scrutinizing these returns--people like agents of the Internal Revenue Service and maybe the FBI. Who knows. This is all very strange.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
22. Nothing the GOPers do surprise me anymore now,I thought Cain would've dropped out sooner than he did
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 06:49 AM
Jan 2012

but that didn't happen for quite some time.

I remember when I was surprised back when Michele Bachmann won her re-election in 2010. I thought that her interview on MSNBC where she said that Congress should be investigated to see which Congress members were UNamerican would have been the end of her political career but it wasn't.

I don't have a clue anymore what will happen or when anything will happen.

onenote

(42,684 posts)
23. It would not only be surprising if Romney dropped out, it would be shocking
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:28 AM
Jan 2012

Its not going to happen so long as he's the front runner nationally. It certainly isn't happening until after Super Tuesday and I'm having trouble seeing how Super Tuesday derails him.

He's been coasting and now its getting bumpy. But if the repub nominating process has proven anything, bumps along the way don't translate into the end of the road. Just ask Newt, who seemingly had been bumped from contention twice before his latest comeback.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
25. I think things will have to get much worse for Romney to drop out
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 09:37 AM
Jan 2012

I agree with what someone else said that it will be down to Romney and either Santorum or Gingrich.

Response to monmouth (Original post)

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
29. The problem is that he owes the Republican Establishment and his corporate benefactors.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:42 PM
Feb 2012

He's not going to stop out of this race. He's so arrogant that he thinks he'll untouchable. He also has enough money to influence the outcomes of at least the caucuses.

And finally, he won the CPAC straw poll which should give him some confidence going in.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
33. I just don't see Mitt as the type of guy who really WANTS a job.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 05:58 PM
Feb 2012

He likes having things 'in the works' and acting like he's got plans and shit like that, but he's become so used to being a ... uber-wealthy slacker that I can't see him actually committing to anything that's going to require him to show up every day.

He reminds me of those rich frat bastards from the 80's who never really had a job but always looked like they did ... it was all daddy's money & the appearance of 'doing something'.

Seriously.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
36. PPP National Poll: Romney collapsing, Santorum surging with + 15 point lead.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 09:02 PM
Feb 2012

If he gets humililated in his birth state his contributors will dry up and he will quit.

Just like he did last time.

BTW last time he put in millions of his own money, not so this time.

Moondog

(4,833 posts)
37. I hope you're right.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 09:12 PM
Feb 2012

I just don't think so. He appears to be the choice of the Bushes and the Party Hacks. And they are buying him the candidacy. Because they want to be rid of the Tea Baggers as badly as we do. Can't be having unwashed assholes screwing up the sinecures that they view as theirs as a matter of birthright, now can we? Even if the Pukes lose, and they will, the Bushes and the Party Hacks will get theirs. It's their little empire, after all.

But it doesn't matter whether Rmoney gets the nomination, or doesn't get the nomination, because either way President Obama will eat his, and their, lunch.

Marsala

(2,090 posts)
38. No way. Mitt is in it until the bitter end.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 09:44 PM
Feb 2012

He won't drop out until someone else clinches the nomination.

Cosmocat

(14,561 posts)
40. He is still the odds on favorite
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 02:54 PM
Feb 2012

He leads in some of the key REALLY big winner takes all states and already has a lead.

These campaigns are two years long now, EVERYONE gets wore down and rough around the edges along the way.

Best case scenario is dragging it out and increasing the circus with the primary, one way or another.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I wouldn't be at all surp...