Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNYT's Thomas B. Edsall: The War on Entitlements
March 6, 2013
The War On Entitlements
By THOMAS B. EDSALL
The debate over reform of Social Security and Medicare is taking place in a vacuum, without adequate consideration of fundamental facts.
These facts include the following: Two-thirds of Americans who are over the age of 65 depend on an average annual Social Security benefit of $15,168.36 for at least half of their income.
Currently, earned income in excess of $113,700 is entirely exempt from the 6.2 percent payroll tax that funds Social Security benefits (employers pay a matching 6.2 percent). 5.2 percent of working Americans make more than $113,700 a year. Simply by eliminating the payroll tax earnings cap and thus ending this regressive exemption for the top 5.2 percent of earners would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, solve the financial crisis facing the Social Security system.
So why dont we talk about raising or eliminating the cap a measure that has strong popular, though not elite, support?
more...
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/the-war-on-entitlements/?hp
The War On Entitlements
By THOMAS B. EDSALL
The debate over reform of Social Security and Medicare is taking place in a vacuum, without adequate consideration of fundamental facts.
These facts include the following: Two-thirds of Americans who are over the age of 65 depend on an average annual Social Security benefit of $15,168.36 for at least half of their income.
Currently, earned income in excess of $113,700 is entirely exempt from the 6.2 percent payroll tax that funds Social Security benefits (employers pay a matching 6.2 percent). 5.2 percent of working Americans make more than $113,700 a year. Simply by eliminating the payroll tax earnings cap and thus ending this regressive exemption for the top 5.2 percent of earners would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, solve the financial crisis facing the Social Security system.
So why dont we talk about raising or eliminating the cap a measure that has strong popular, though not elite, support?
more...
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/the-war-on-entitlements/?hp
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2050 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT's Thomas B. Edsall: The War on Entitlements (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Mar 2013
OP
WillyT
(72,631 posts)1. K & R !!!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)2. R & K
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)3. I depend on Social Security benefits of $17,000 minus Medicare payments
of $105 monthly for ALL of my income. I have no other income but savings, which I only withdraw from in cases of emergencies.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)4. The real question is why Obama has never talked about it.
hay rick
(7,588 posts)5. But that wouldn't be bipartisan.
That would mean being a Democrat.