Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jillan

(39,451 posts)
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 01:27 PM Apr 2012

WHY didn't the nasty comments about Michelle get this much attention in 2008?

WHY is it that Foster Freiss' comments about our President needing a bulletproof teleprompter isn't getting as much attention as Hillary Rosen's comments? He made a subtle suggestion of violence against the President of the United States for crying out loud?


WHY are the Republicans allowed to make such a big deal about this "phony war on women" that all the news outlets feel they have to respond ~ But when the Republicans make a big deal about the phony war on Christmas, no one says a word.

Why? Why? Why?


Turning off the news and turning on some tunes instead.

edit for typo (2x - blush)

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WHY didn't the nasty comments about Michelle get this much attention in 2008? (Original Post) jillan Apr 2012 OP
Because the media gets to decide..... FrenchieCat Apr 2012 #1
Because Democrats are back to their overlt timid game again! mazzarro Apr 2012 #2
There was no controversial issue in what was said by Hillary Rosen...... FrenchieCat Apr 2012 #3
There is a difference between taking a stand on a controversial issue Arkana Apr 2012 #8
Because the corporations and GOP own the media? sinkingfeeling Apr 2012 #4
I know - I'm just beatching ;) jillan Apr 2012 #5
because Ann is rich and white and Michelle is a self made successful black woman? WI_DEM Apr 2012 #6
She's black. Arkana Apr 2012 #7

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
1. Because the media gets to decide.....
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 01:39 PM
Apr 2012

not anyone else....and they need a tight race, and to date, it really hasn't been.

Romney and his mommy jeans are so bad, the media has to do what it can to
shore up Romney's numbers so they can get those big millions of advertising dollars
into their coffers.

When the media keeps announcing this is going to be a "close" race, and the most
expensive race in history......they will make it all happen. As far as they are concern,
that is their only job!

mazzarro

(3,450 posts)
2. Because Democrats are back to their overlt timid game again!
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 01:41 PM
Apr 2012

They are so afraid of taking stand on "controversial" issues that they would rather forgo any opportunity to take shots at rePIGs even if it is to the advantage of Democrats.

I guess the backbone we thought they have acquired is really a temporary thing - an illusion, if I might say.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
3. There was no controversial issue in what was said by Hillary Rosen......
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 01:59 PM
Apr 2012

but go ahead and blame Democrats, why don't you?

After all, that is exactly what the gop/media puppet masters are ordering!

Enjoy having your strings pulled along with your great big-o backbone!

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
8. There is a difference between taking a stand on a controversial issue
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 02:54 PM
Apr 2012

and not defending some woman who used to work for the DNC because she said something she knew could easily be taken out of context.

I don't see the Democrats abandoning the "Mitt Romney-as-Monopoly-guy" line of attack any time soon. Relax.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WHY didn't the nasty comm...