Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cane4Dems

(305 posts)
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:23 PM Mar 2013

We need to have Scott Prouty's Back

Without this man's courageous actions I truly feel President Obama would have had a much tougher time winning the election

With all the hate that is being blasted towards him we need to show him that there are many who respect what he did and are willing to support him

Here is a link I found on a mother jones article where he is raising money to help him with any legal troubles, hiring a security team since the crazy rightwingers seem to believe violence is the solution to anyhting that they are against, and he said he needs money to go to law school

(link for the fund is http://www.gofundme.com/1ix17c)
link of original article is http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/03/scott-prouty-47-percent-legal-assistance-fund)

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
2. President Obama won the election 4 years ago. Mitt never stood a chance.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:30 PM
Mar 2013

saying otherwise is delegitimizing the historic landslide President Obama won both in 2008 and 2012.
President Obama being the first legitimate President since LBJ.

there never was any way for Mitt to get 270. It was statistically impossible.

Almost all of President Obama's core voters voted FOR him, not against someone else.
Whereas almost no one voted for Mitt, but were attempting to vote against the President.

It is nicely ironic that Herr Mittens only got 47%. But there was no way he ever was going to get any more.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
4. President Obama WON and this did not cause him to win. It was already won.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:49 PM
Mar 2013

The wording is all wrong.

In effect, this just actually lets Mitt say he would have won if this didn't happen,therefore, it leads to Mitt even being talked about, instead of his being totally forgotten by now.

Takes nothing away from the guy, however, it also has nothing to do with the election results.

Mitt lost. It was a foregone conclusion President Obama would win, except to Karl Rove and Dick Morris and Fox.

It was not close. Not by a mile.

It was as statistically impossible for Mitt as it would have been for Hillary in 2008 to win the nomination. (Hillary would have destroyed McCain, but there was NO way that she would have been able to win the nomination, it was statistically decided weeks and weeks earlier).

Memes take hold and it should be nipped in the bud saying that this in any way changed the outcome.

Nothing wrong with congratulating the two of them (this guy and Jimmy Carter IV), but they did not contribute to the victory, it was already won.

So I do not wish to empower Mitt and give him an excuse to whine more that this caused him to lose. No Mitt (or any other person who would have been the nominee, never stood a chance whatsoever.)

imho

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
5. At the exact moment the story came out, Obama was losing in the polls. You also discount
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:59 PM
Mar 2013

election fraud. Don't take elections for granted. The right wing certainly doesn't.

Cane4Dems

(305 posts)
7. I said Pres. Obama would have had a tougher time winning
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:02 PM
Mar 2013

nowhere do I insinuate that Pres. Obama would not have won the election

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
8. I also heard that Bill Clinton won it for Obama. o well.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:13 PM
Mar 2013

but Prouty certainly did have an influence, I don't think there is much doubt. And in a much more concrete way than Clinton.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
10. WHO CARES!?
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 12:55 AM
Mar 2013

This story isn't about who won the election. It's about someone who had the courage to stand up for what was right and expose Mittens as the man he truly is.

What on Earth could possibly be wrong with that?

TexasBushwhacker

(20,162 posts)
9. It doesn't look like he's being greedy
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:19 PM
Mar 2013

The fund says it's 20% to it's goal. He's had 69 donors and the average donation is under $50. I think he's only trying to raise $10K to $15K. In contrast, George Zimmerman has raised over $300K.

 

DirtyDawg

(802 posts)
11. From the first...
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 01:04 AM
Mar 2013

...time I heard, and saw, this recording, I've said that I hope one day when the person that did this goes public, he/she will say that 'the moral of this story is, Mr. Romney, that you should have paid more attention to the movie 'The Help'...specifically, that those 'serving' you have eyes, ears and feelings...only now they've got IPhones too.'

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»We need to have Scott Pro...