Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:11 AM Mar 2013

Feinstein: I “Felt Patronized” By Ted Cruz

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) elaborated on her spat with Ted Cruz during a hearing on a federal assault weapons ban on Thursday, saying she resented the tone of the junior Senator from Texas.

"Well, I just felt patronized," Feinstein told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "I felt he was somewhat arrogant about it. When you come from where I've come from and what you've seen, when you found a dead body and put your finger in bullet holes, you really realize the impact of weapons. And then as you go up the technical ladder with these weapons, and they become more sophisticated, and more the product of a battlefield, and you've got these huge clips, or drums of 100 bullets out there that people can buy, when you see these weapons becoming attractive to grievance killers, people who take them into schools, into theaters, into malls, you wonder, does America really need these weapons? My answer to that is no. And so it's based on my experience."

Cruz, a former constitutional law professor, recited portions of the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, and asked Feinstein whether the power of government to restrict certain types of guns would be equally appropriate given those provisions.

"Let me just make a couple of points in response. One, I'm not a sixth grader. Senator, I've been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years. I walked in, I saw people shot. I've looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons," she said. Feinstein served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in the 1970s, announcing the assassinations of Mayor George Moscone and City Supervisor Harvey Milk.



http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/feinstein-i-felt-patronized-by-ted-cruz-video?ref=fpb
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feinstein: I “Felt Patronized” By Ted Cruz (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2013 OP
Sorry? brucefan Mar 2013 #1
Yes... she shouldn't have told him that she was sorry. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #2
Article says that Cruz is a former law professor DURHAM D Mar 2013 #3
searches say he was a adjunct (is that a sub teacher?) Professor of Law for UT, about 4 years.? Sunlei Mar 2013 #10
Thank you for finding that. DURHAM D Mar 2013 #11
Obama was in a similar position marshall Mar 2013 #16
Poor, poor lady JayhawkSD Mar 2013 #4
Why? Isn't she also a gun owner? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #5
No constitutional rights are absolute Yavin4 Mar 2013 #6
I guess when you are used to doing the patronizing yourself, that is quite a shock. nt bemildred Mar 2013 #7
That is because you WERE patronized. GoCubsGo Mar 2013 #8
Now if she would only apologize MurrayDelph Mar 2013 #9
He was mansplaining to her about the Constitution.. annabanana Mar 2013 #12
He is an incredible ass. So full of himself DevonRex Mar 2013 #13
She should not try WhataKnight Mar 2013 #14
Feinstein and Pelosi "just not very smart sounding"? pinto Mar 2013 #15
Oh, yes she should Generic Brad Mar 2013 #17
You think Ted Cruz is smart?! lunatica Mar 2013 #18
Seriously? Bobbie Jo Mar 2013 #19
Yes WhataKnight Mar 2013 #20
Oh yeah? How so? Bobbie Jo Mar 2013 #22
Well, if he can talk circles around her - why didn't he? BellaLuna Mar 2013 #21

LiberalFighter

(50,888 posts)
2. Yes... she shouldn't have told him that she was sorry.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:38 AM
Mar 2013

He should had apologized! He wouldn't have done that with anyone else with his attitude.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
3. Article says that Cruz is a former law professor
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 10:07 AM
Mar 2013

but his Wiki entry makes no mention of that. Does anyone know where he taught?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
10. searches say he was a adjunct (is that a sub teacher?) Professor of Law for UT, about 4 years.?
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 03:46 PM
Mar 2013

Kind of strange he doesn't back up his words with a full factual school resume.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
11. Thank you for finding that.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 04:18 PM
Mar 2013

Adjunct means not on tenure track so yes it is like a substitute teacher. UT is a good law school and all the constitutional law professors probably thought he was a total wack job.

His wiki entry with regard to his father re: supported Castro then did not support Castro sounds totally made up. Reminds me of Rubio who can't get his Cuban family history straight. I know a lot of people whose families fled Cuba in the early 60s. They were all Batista supporters or worked in the government before 1959 and their fathers still think they will one day return to Cuba and re-occupy the family villa.

marshall

(6,665 posts)
16. Obama was in a similar position
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 10:14 AM
Mar 2013

Lecturers, like adjuncts, are not tenure track. They are both assigned to classes as needed, but they are not the same as substitutes in public school.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
4. Poor, poor lady
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 10:08 AM
Mar 2013

Considering the number of people she has patronized, maybe it was good for her to find out what it feels like.

Yavin4

(35,437 posts)
6. No constitutional rights are absolute
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 10:18 AM
Mar 2013

Govt has amended our rights repeatedly. Take the 1st amendent. Do you see cigarette advertising any where? See below.

You would think that a Harvard law grad would know this.

See the Tobacco Control Act

Most recently, signed into law by President Barack Obama, the Tobacco Control Act became active on 22 June 2010. This act not only placed new restrictions on tobacco marketing but also extensive constraints concerning the circulation of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to minors. Newly effective with this act, “audio advertisements are not permitted to contain any music or sound effects, while video advertisements are limited to static black text on a white background. Any audio soundtrack accompanying a video advertisement is limited to words only, with no music or sound effects.”


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_advertising

MurrayDelph

(5,293 posts)
9. Now if she would only apologize
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 02:04 PM
Mar 2013

for having been patronizing and condescending in her responses when I wrote to her.

But, I don't live in California any more, and now I have two Senators I like (whom I have met, and treat people with courtesy and dignity).

 

WhataKnight

(40 posts)
14. She should not try
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 07:53 AM
Mar 2013

To out smart someone like him. Stick to her fight but he can talk circles around her. Like Pelosi, she has a good message, just not very smart sounding.

 

WhataKnight

(40 posts)
20. Yes
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 06:59 PM
Mar 2013

I like her but she comes off sounding like a fool. She is a great women but does not seem too bright.

BellaLuna

(291 posts)
21. Well, if he can talk circles around her - why didn't he?
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 11:13 PM
Mar 2013

He was an arrogant prick and she called him on it.

Sounds like you've got a woman or Democrat issue. Me thinks you won't be around very long.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Feinstein: I “Felt Patron...