Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu May 9, 2013, 07:53 PM May 2013

Bachmann could face lawsuit for ‘propagating complete and utter lies’



By Eric W. Dolan
Wednesday, May 8, 2013 16:49 EDT

A religious freedom advocate told U.S. News he is considering suing Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) over allegedly slanderous comments she made in a fundraising pitch.

“We are caucusing with our legal counsel to consider the most expeditious course of action we can take in a federal court to stop these bald-faced lies,” Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) said. “About 96 percent of our members [at MRFF] are Protestant or Roman Catholic… of our unpaid volunteers, at least well over 80 percent are Christian… I say [to Bachmann]: Tell it to the judge.”

Earlier this month conservative bloggers falsely claimed that Weinstein was behind a plan to court-martial Christians in the military who shared their faith. The conspiracy was quickly debunked by the Pentagon itself, which noted that proselytizing — a form of religious harassment — has long been prohibited, but service members are free to evangelize and speak about their faith.

But as of Wednesday Bachmann’s website still stated that Weinstein’s conspiracy with the Pentagon could “prevent our military from practicing their own faith.” She described Weinstein as a “left-wing, anti-Christian activists” and a “radical.” She also claimed that Weinstein had compared “sharing the gospel to ‘spiritual rape’ and ‘treason,’” when he actually described misogyny, Islamophobia and anti-Semitism as “spiritual rape” and “treason.”

Weinstein accused Bachmann of “propagating complete and utter lies.”

As a proponent of the separation of church and state, Weinstein has clashed with fundamentalist Christians like the American Family Association and the Family Research Council. He described the groups as “pitiable unconstitutional carpetbaggers” who “have taken refuge behind flimsy, well-worn, gauze-like euphemistic facades such as ‘family values’” in an article published at the Huffington Post earlier this year.

###

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/08/bachmann-could-face-lawsuit-for-propagating-complete-and-utter-lies/

Entire article posted with permission
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bachmann could face lawsuit for ‘propagating complete and utter lies’ (Original Post) DonViejo May 2013 OP
Hope he does. This could be fun. Shrike47 May 2013 #1
'bout time, bachmann got sued for Propagasting Complete and utter Lies" Cha May 2013 #2
Go for it I say. How has our country distorted the First Amendment so that Bachman's lies could be okaawhatever May 2013 #3
If we could get a one year sentence for Bachmann for every lie she has told davidpdx May 2013 #4

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
1. Hope he does. This could be fun.
Thu May 9, 2013, 08:19 PM
May 2013

Of course, it sounds like he's a public figure. Still sounds like fun.

Cha

(296,774 posts)
2. 'bout time, bachmann got sued for Propagasting Complete and utter Lies"
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:08 AM
May 2013

Blowback on the monster? I hope so.

thanks DV

okaawhatever

(9,457 posts)
3. Go for it I say. How has our country distorted the First Amendment so that Bachman's lies could be
Fri May 10, 2013, 01:21 AM
May 2013

considered free speech? I think (lawyers help me out) that you have to prove that it caused you harm, not just that it could cause you harm. Does the eroding of the reputation of an organization not qualify as harm?

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. If we could get a one year sentence for Bachmann for every lie she has told
Sat May 11, 2013, 07:47 AM
May 2013

She'd be in prison for life without the possibility of parole.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bachmann could face lawsu...