Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTwo scandals deflated, one persists
In 24 hours, the Benghazi and IRS conspiracy theories took hits. But the DOJs messing with the AP remains trouble
BY JOAN WALSH
The Obama administration started Tuesday mired in three scandals the GOP seemed able to tie into one Big Brother Obama storyline, in the words of Greg Sargent, and ended it appearing to face political culpability on only one, the Department of Justices broad subpoenas obtaining phone records from the Associated Press. Its not to say Benghazi or the IRS mess went away, but the GOPs creepy plot line got a whole lot less plausible.
The Benghazi scandal lost velocity thanks to CNNs Jake Tapper reporting that an email key to the notion that the White House doctored talking points to protect the State Department didnt at all read the way ABCs Jonathan Karl reported it. Karl quoted White House national security communications advisor Ben Rhodes email specifically saying the talking points should reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, but the actual email obtained by Tapper didnt mention the State Department at all. Karl ended the day with the shocking admission that while hed reported on air that hed obtained the emails in question, and wrote online that hed reviewed them, in fact hed only heard about them from the notes of a source presumed to be a House GOP staffer.
Amazingly, Karl insisted Tappers reporting didnt challenge the basic facts of his story, even though he acknowledged for the first time that he hadnt actually obtained or reviewed the actual emails, but rather had notes about them read to him by his source. The fact that Karl put the purported email from Rhodes within quotation marks which in actual journalism means youre reading a direct quote from someone seriously damages his credibility. But the ABC reporter reported concluded his self-defense by blaming the White House for failing to release all the emails rather than blaming his source for misleading him, or himself for misleading his readers by using quotes around the Rhodes email.
Heres hoping ABC News explains why the paraphrased depiction of notes about an email from a hostile source wound up within quotation marks attributed to Rhodes, and whether thats the news organizations policy.
full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 928 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two scandals deflated, one persists (Original Post)
DonViejo
May 2013
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. I wish the IRS scandal had deflated.
But we're stuck with it.
falcon97
(354 posts)2. Did the DOJ break the law?
I am honestly so lost and it gets glossed over every time a talking head brings up "scandal." I was under the impression it was pushing the boundaries of DOJ guidelines, though legal, for them to use warrants to track phone records. Is this not the case?