Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,437 posts)
Wed May 15, 2013, 01:52 PM May 2013

Q&A: Details of the IRS Controversy

(snip)


Why do groups apply for 501(c)(4) status?

The designation means groups don't have to pay taxes on their revenue nor publicly disclose their donors' identities. The number of applications rose sharply after the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which held that corporations, labor unions and others could make unlimited campaign donations. The ruling meant the 501(c)(4) groups could spend money to try to influence elections, such as by running ads.

What types of groups does the 501(c)(4) category include?

The groups are typically civic leagues, social-welfare organizations and local associations of employees. Examples include the Sierra Club, the National Rifle Association and neighborhood beautification groups. But some 501(c)(4)s are politically tilted, such as Priorities USA, formed by former aides to President Barack Obama, and Crossroads GPS, formed by Karl Rove to support conservative causes. These are different from the largest category, 501(c)(3), which includes religious, educational and charitable groups eligible to receive tax-deductible donations.

Are 501(c)(4)s allowed to engage in political activity?

Yes. As part of their mission to promote social welfare, they are allowed to lobby without limit and participate in campaigns—so long as that is not their primary activity.

How clear is the definition of permitted activities?

Experts say it is very blurry and largely depends on facts and circumstances. According to Ellen Aprill, an expert in non-profit law who teaches at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, $100,000 used to fund an advertisement might be allowable or not depending on the ad's timing and the importance of the issue. Ms. Aprill and others believe such vague definitions leave the 501(c)(4) format open to abuse by groups that gather funds from anonymous donors on the left or right to fund hard-hitting political ads or give money to other political groups.

(snip)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324031404578481451628392008.html

(If you cannot access the story by clicking, copy and paste the title onto google)


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Q&A: Details of the IRS Controversy (Original Post) question everything May 2013 OP
Thanks and see 'primary' reason for problems interpreting and implementing, elleng May 2013 #1
Thank you. An interesting and sobering discussion there question everything May 2013 #2
Recommended and bookmarked. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #3

question everything

(47,437 posts)
2. Thank you. An interesting and sobering discussion there
Wed May 15, 2013, 03:39 PM
May 2013

After reading the above I concluded that the whole 501(c) etc. should be scrapped. After watching Lawrence O'Donnell clip I am convinced that it should.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Q&A: Details of the IRS C...