Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun May 26, 2013, 11:09 AM May 2013

GOP Congressman ‘Offended’ By Moral Questions Obama Addressed In Counterterror Speech

The House Homeland Security Committee chairman said on Sunday that he was “offended” that President Obama considered moral questions about U.S. counterterrorism policy in his major speech on national security last week.

“That’s what bothered me about the president’s speech,” Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said on ABC’s This Week, was “the moral anguishing he was going through.” When asked whether the Obama administration should change its drone policy, King replied, “If it does change it shouldn’t change for moral reasons,” apparently because the New York Republican thinks the United States should’t have to ask moral questions about its foreign policy:

KING: Listen, every soldier, every cop who is faced with a decision to make, life or death, does the best he or she can and I think our country has done more than any country in the history of the world to limit civilian casualties so that just offended me, that whole tone of it. (...)

As far as the policy …. I think this policy basically has worked … and perhaps we can fine tune it, we can put more emphasis on clandestine activity of actually gathering intelligence rather than relying so much on drones but for me i don’t think the president really addressed that in the speech. I think he was coming at it from a more from this moral tone which I just think was misplaced. I don’t think it’s called for.


full article
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/26/2062851/peter-king-obama-offended-speech/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Congressman ‘Offended’ By Moral Questions Obama Addressed In Counterterror Speech (Original Post) DonViejo May 2013 OP
translated...Republican offended because POTUS opened his mouth about anything chelsea0011 May 2013 #1
DUer 'offended' by obnoxious attitude of GOP congressman. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2013 #2
A country without morals would resemble Germany in the 30's and 40's Mr. King. Would that offend appleannie1 May 2013 #3
The Grand Dragon of Nassau County is offended Dawson Leery May 2013 #4
Think lsewpershad May 2013 #5
Is any patriotic American not offended by what Rep. Peter King (R-NY) says, indepat May 2013 #6
Sun Tzu , about the morals of war. BillyRibs May 2013 #7
Strangeness: the GOP claims to run on morality jmowreader May 2013 #8
 

BillyRibs

(787 posts)
7. Sun Tzu , about the morals of war.
Sun May 26, 2013, 09:48 PM
May 2013
The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.

I.O.W. King has No idea whatsoever about the waging of war, or how to conduct a war. The man speaks first before he thinks.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
8. Strangeness: the GOP claims to run on morality
Tue May 28, 2013, 03:11 PM
May 2013

Think of the social issue: abortion, gay marriage, whatever. The GOP will claim 'morality' is behind their opposition. But bring up the notion we have an obligation to not indiscriminately kill random people and morality should play no part.

Which only proves morality isn't really behind religion; it's simply a way to legitimize hatred.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»GOP Congressman ‘Offended...