2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGOP Congressman ‘Offended’ By Moral Questions Obama Addressed In Counterterror Speech
The House Homeland Security Committee chairman said on Sunday that he was offended that President Obama considered moral questions about U.S. counterterrorism policy in his major speech on national security last week.
Thats what bothered me about the presidents speech, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said on ABCs This Week, was the moral anguishing he was going through. When asked whether the Obama administration should change its drone policy, King replied, If it does change it shouldnt change for moral reasons, apparently because the New York Republican thinks the United States shouldt have to ask moral questions about its foreign policy:
KING: Listen, every soldier, every cop who is faced with a decision to make, life or death, does the best he or she can and I think our country has done more than any country in the history of the world to limit civilian casualties so that just offended me, that whole tone of it. (...)
As far as the policy . I think this policy basically has worked and perhaps we can fine tune it, we can put more emphasis on clandestine activity of actually gathering intelligence rather than relying so much on drones but for me i dont think the president really addressed that in the speech. I think he was coming at it from a more from this moral tone which I just think was misplaced. I dont think its called for.
full article
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/26/2062851/peter-king-obama-offended-speech/
chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)Peter King can bite me.
appleannie1
(5,067 posts)you?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)that Obama will not discriminate against Arabs.
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)King feels this way because he is amoral? just asking.
indepat
(20,899 posts)does, and stands for?
BillyRibs
(787 posts)I.O.W. King has No idea whatsoever about the waging of war, or how to conduct a war. The man speaks first before he thinks.
jmowreader
(50,552 posts)Think of the social issue: abortion, gay marriage, whatever. The GOP will claim 'morality' is behind their opposition. But bring up the notion we have an obligation to not indiscriminately kill random people and morality should play no part.
Which only proves morality isn't really behind religion; it's simply a way to legitimize hatred.