Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 11:20 PM Jul 2013

BREAKING: North Carolina Legislature Approves Nation's Most Restrictive Voter Suppression Law

Late Thursday night, the North Carolina state legislature approved a radical voter suppression bill on a party line vote. The measure, easily the most extreme anti-voter bill passed by any state since the Jim Crow Era, now heads to Republican Governor Pat McCrory for his signature. Court challenges, many of them, will most assuredly follow.


http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10156

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: North Carolina Legislature Approves Nation's Most Restrictive Voter Suppression Law (Original Post) UCmeNdc Jul 2013 OP
here is the kicker DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #1
can their vote be challenged? votingupstart Jul 2013 #2
the way Karl Rove did it in the past was to send mail to each registered voter. If it came back from okaawhatever Jul 2013 #3

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
1. here is the kicker
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jul 2013

From the article"
Allow any registered voter of a county to challenge the eligibility of a voter rather than just a voter of the precinct in which the suspect voter is registered.

In other words, a lot of paid operatives masquerading as "concerned citizens" will be busy blocking any Latino or Black vote they can.

votingupstart

(537 posts)
2. can their vote be challenged?
Sat Jul 27, 2013, 12:21 AM
Jul 2013

just a few thoughts:

can i sue them for stopping me from voting?
can i challenge their voting?
what is the level of "proof" need to "challenge" and who gets to decide the outcome of the challenge?

okaawhatever

(9,457 posts)
3. the way Karl Rove did it in the past was to send mail to each registered voter. If it came back from
Sat Jul 27, 2013, 01:42 AM
Jul 2013

the postal service it was considered a bad address. You do that enough times and it will wipe a few out. The computer errors, incomplete addresses (missing apt numbers) etc will really hurt. The other part of the law says you have to b registered 25 days prior to election. I think whatever they're going to do will be in that window where someone can't re-register.
Believe me, they have a plan for this, it will be interesting to find out what it is.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»BREAKING: North Carolina ...