Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 09:08 AM Sep 2013

Rubio: We Wouldn’t Be At This Stage With Syria ‘If I Had Been In Charge’

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said Tuesday that he's "very skeptical" that the proposed airstrike on Syria will deter the Assad regime from using chemical weapons in the future, while arguing that he'd have handled the situation far better than President Barack Obama.

"I don’t believe we should take military action unless we have a clear and achievable goal in mind," Rubio told Fox News Channel's Bret Baier. "And one of the clear goals of this action he’s arguing for is to impede Assad from using chemical weapons in the future. I am highly skeptical. Now we have a closed hearing tomorrow where classified information will be discussed, and I’ll wait until then to reserve judgment. But I remain very skeptical that the kind of attack they’re contemplating, this limited attack, is going to actually achieve that goal of preventing Assad from using chemical weapons in the future."

When Baier asked the Florida senator what he'd have done if he had been commander-in-chief, Rubio eschewed specifics but asserted that the U.S. would have "never gotten to this stage" with Syria if he had been in the White House.

"Well, first of all, we have to outline what should have been done because that's important," Rubio said. "We have to understand, if I had been in charge — or someone else, hopefully — we'd have never gotten to this stage. So if we inherited this mess, which we have now, I think our obligation is to try to figure out what is the least worst option available to us because they're all bad. And part of that equation, I can't tell you right now until we go through that intelligence briefing tomorrow because one of the key questions we have to ask ourselves is, 'Who are these so-called moderates on the ground in Syria and are they even capable of taking control of the country and giving us a rational, secular, stable government?' That's a key question."



###

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rubio-we-wouldnt-be-at-this-stage-with
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rubio: We Wouldn’t Be At This Stage With Syria ‘If I Had Been In Charge’ (Original Post) DonViejo Sep 2013 OP
Well.... AZ Mike Sep 2013 #1
More fantasy football woulda-coulda-shoulda slackerPTAmom Sep 2013 #2
Great analogy, and welcome to DU! eom Tanuki Sep 2013 #28
'Cause I woulda, like, nuked Assad months ago, man.' Rozlee Sep 2013 #3
Oh really? What would you have done, Marco? Arkana Sep 2013 #4
He actually said that?!?! zappaman Sep 2013 #5
nothing like asserting something that cannot possibly be proven RussBLib Sep 2013 #6
He can't even say anything specific that he would have done differently Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #8
Hey Marco, your fifteen minutes were up a while ago. polichick Sep 2013 #7
That's true.... Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #9
^ for the win ^ Myrina Sep 2013 #21
"because if repulicans were in power Assad wouldn't be such a dick" Rubiosity. TeamPooka Sep 2013 #10
rubio is a lying sack of crap mgcgulfcoast Sep 2013 #11
Ahhhh, that's precious little fella. AtomicKitten Sep 2013 #12
I saw that interview davidpdx Sep 2013 #13
lol. I still go back to how he lied about his parents fleeing Castro who wasn't even Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2013 #19
Translation: I licked my finger and put it up one day back when, but sadly there was no wind libdem4life Sep 2013 #14
Did he awkwardly lunge for water during his brilliant exposition? kairos12 Sep 2013 #15
No, you'd be screaming POLO tavernier Sep 2013 #16
What a dunce. Blue Idaho Sep 2013 #17
Can you imagine him debating Mr.Bill Sep 2013 #18
worse or better than Romney? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2013 #20
Far worse. Mr.Bill Sep 2013 #23
If he was in charge he would use a nuclear bomb on Cuba. LiberalFighter Sep 2013 #22
rubio is a slick liar mgcgulfcoast Sep 2013 #24
Rubio: We would still be fighting in Iraq 'if I had been in charge'. eom Jamaal510 Sep 2013 #25
He's Cool Hand Luke, long as his wawa bottle is nearby BeyondGeography Sep 2013 #26
And then Bret asked him to show where Syria is on the map. blm Sep 2013 #27
Haha.. RuBollocks Hutzpa Sep 2013 #29
I believe FDR had something to say about this... Hippo_Tron Sep 2013 #30
An outline? Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2013 #31

slackerPTAmom

(2 posts)
2. More fantasy football woulda-coulda-shoulda
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:22 AM
Sep 2013

Ack. Rubio's equivocating means he's just as stumped as the rest of the herd.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
3. 'Cause I woulda, like, nuked Assad months ago, man.'
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:21 AM
Sep 2013

'Or sent Bruce Willis in to take him out. Or gotten the Terminator to keep going after him. Or, hey, maybe even gotten one of those Aliens implanted in his chest...totally awesome. Where's my water? Glug, glug, glug.'

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
8. He can't even say anything specific that he would have done differently
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:27 PM
Sep 2013

Typical Republican: All style, no substance.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
19. lol. I still go back to how he lied about his parents fleeing Castro who wasn't even
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 08:37 AM
Sep 2013

in power when they left Cuba.

Don't want people to forget that

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
14. Translation: I licked my finger and put it up one day back when, but sadly there was no wind
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:13 PM
Sep 2013

blowing. So you can't blame me.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rubio: We Wouldn’t Be At ...