Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDavid Weigel: What if Sheldon Adelson and AIPAC Gave a War and No One Came?
What if Sheldon Adelson and AIPAC Gave a War and No One Came?
By David Weigel
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM
Las Vegas casino boss Sheldon Adelson gestures during press conference in Macau on Sept. 20, 2012. Adelson unveiled plans to build a scaled-down replica of the Eiffel Tower as part of a new $3 billion gambling resort in Macau.
Photo by Philippe Lopez/AFP/GettyImages
Shane Goldmacher talks to Sheldon Adelson about the conflict with Syria. Surprise: He's for intervening, and willing to help Barack Obama make the case, whatever that might mean.
He said he worries about missiles, and chemical and biological weapons falling into the hands of Hezbollah. And he sees the potential that America might back down after Obama drew a "red line" against use of chemical weapons in Syria as poor precedent in the Middle East and beyond. "I wouldn't want to see North Korea come down and trample on South Korea because they think they can do it with impunity. And the same thing with Iran and Israel, and Iran and Europe," he said.
And so Adelson said it's time for Republicans to line up behind Obama, however they feel about him personally. "Whether we care or not about whether he loses credibility is not the issue," he said. "The issue is whether or not the United States of America loses credibility."
But you know what? It doesn't look like this matters. AIPAC endorsed the idea of airstrikes early in this debate, and it moved not a single member of Congress. Haaretz noticed that, asking whether "the American Jewish establishment" had dealt itself permanent damage by revealing its total lack of influence on this issue. It's just not clear than any lobbying would have worked; too many members of Congress worry that displacing a secular tyranny will mean installing an Islamic one, and worry about the fate of millions of Syrian Christians. That's overwhelming the worry about Israel. It might be a watershed moment.
By David Weigel
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM
Las Vegas casino boss Sheldon Adelson gestures during press conference in Macau on Sept. 20, 2012. Adelson unveiled plans to build a scaled-down replica of the Eiffel Tower as part of a new $3 billion gambling resort in Macau.
Photo by Philippe Lopez/AFP/GettyImages
Shane Goldmacher talks to Sheldon Adelson about the conflict with Syria. Surprise: He's for intervening, and willing to help Barack Obama make the case, whatever that might mean.
He said he worries about missiles, and chemical and biological weapons falling into the hands of Hezbollah. And he sees the potential that America might back down after Obama drew a "red line" against use of chemical weapons in Syria as poor precedent in the Middle East and beyond. "I wouldn't want to see North Korea come down and trample on South Korea because they think they can do it with impunity. And the same thing with Iran and Israel, and Iran and Europe," he said.
And so Adelson said it's time for Republicans to line up behind Obama, however they feel about him personally. "Whether we care or not about whether he loses credibility is not the issue," he said. "The issue is whether or not the United States of America loses credibility."
But you know what? It doesn't look like this matters. AIPAC endorsed the idea of airstrikes early in this debate, and it moved not a single member of Congress. Haaretz noticed that, asking whether "the American Jewish establishment" had dealt itself permanent damage by revealing its total lack of influence on this issue. It's just not clear than any lobbying would have worked; too many members of Congress worry that displacing a secular tyranny will mean installing an Islamic one, and worry about the fate of millions of Syrian Christians. That's overwhelming the worry about Israel. It might be a watershed moment.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1199 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Weigel: What if Sheldon Adelson and AIPAC Gave a War and No One Came? (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Sep 2013
OP
tularetom
(23,664 posts)1. If this whole Syria affair helps disarm these jackoffs
and does it without firing a shot, then perhaps it can be looked at as a good thing.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)2. Agreed. Israel will not be happy about this new development.