2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrailer for America’s Wild Horses, The Documentary
This has to do with politics because the Federal Gov. is in charge of management of our public lands & parks. Congress passed the law that is broken, so many times.
The Great Lakes have zebra mussels and gobies, the South has kudzu and S. American fire ants. Florida has iguanas and many Pacific Islands have problems with rats or snakes. The Catalinas off the California coast has goats.
All destroy eco-systems, starve or drive off native species. We're busy spending a lot of money on conservative and species protection. It's a progressive thing.
The West has horses. They may be cute and majestic looking but that's pretty much their only difference from zebra mussels, gobies, kudzu, fire ants, iguanas, rats, snakes, and goats.
Don't see a reason to suddenly stop being eco-friendly.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Their grazing habits, type of digestion improves the eco-system. Wild horses are as native a species as the bald eagle.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Horses were native to North America - until humans arrived. It's probable/possible that humans killed off the North American horses and drastically altered the ecosystem that existed when they arrived by hunting, burning, killing off large predators, etc. It's just as probable/possible that the end of the Ice Ages altered the ecosystem resulting in the extinctions of horses and megafauna.
We don't know which was responsible for the disappearance of horses in North America.
It's also clear that killing off the feral horses (they aren't wild, they are the offspring of released/escaped animals) is not politically possible even if it were desirable.
As with the other examples of species that are now in our ecosystems and cannot or will not be removed, we need to learn how to restore a balance. The specific ones mentioned - zebra mussels, gobies, kudzu, fire ants, iguanas, rats, snakes, and goats - may be more destructive or annoying than many others, but maybe we should spend more time and money into researching how to balance their impact than on how to simply kill them off.
Horses disappeared from North America maybe 12,000 after evolving here for millions of years. They were re-introduced 600 years ago. What period of time do we allow for claiming a species is "native"?
Of interest:
Genome sequencing
In June 2013, a group of researchers announced that they had sequenced the DNA of a 560780 thousand year old horse, using material extracted from a leg bone found buried in permafrost in Canada's Yukon territory.[30] Prior to this publication, the oldest nuclear genome that had been successfully sequenced was dated at 110130 thousand years ago. For comparison, the researchers also sequenced the genomes of a 43,000 year old Pleistocene horse, a Przewalski's horse, five modern horse breeds, and a donkey.[31] Analysis of differences between these genomes indicated that the last common ancestor of modern horses, donkeys, and zebras existed 4 to 4.5 million years ago.[30] The results also indicated that Przewalskis horse diverged from other modern types of horse about 43,000 years ago, and had never in its evolutionary history been domesticated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_horse#Modern_horses
Horses have long since reached a certain balance in the Western ecosystem. Removal of predators and commercial use of grazing areas have made more impact than the horses themselves, IMO.