A compromised reputation among the GOP - By Michael Gerson
By Michael Gerson
The effort to defund Obamacare, culminating in Sen. Ted Cruzs marathon speech on the Senate floor, has been symbolic in ways its sponsors did not intend.
This, in the end, was the strategy: For procedural reasons, senators needed to vote against a House spending bill defunding Obamacare in order to force a government shutdown, in order to cut off federal spending unrelated to Obamacare, in order to trigger a wave of public revulsion against Obamacare, in order to force President Obama to trade away his signature legislative accomplishment. And any elected Republican, by the way, who questions the practicality of this approach is a quisling.
It is the fullest expression (so far) of the view of leadership held by the new, anti-establishment conservative establishment: Exploit a legitimate populist cause to demand a counterproductive tactic in an insufferable tone, then use the inevitable failure to discredit opponents in an intra-party struggle. More Picketts charges, please. They are emotionally satisfying (and good for fundraising). And the carnage may produce new generals, who are more favorable to future Picketts charges.
In the process, the GOP is made to look unserious and incapable of governing. But that is beside the point. The advocates of defunding have bigger ideological fish to fry. They argue that, over the decades, Republican compromisers have been complicit in producing a federal government so overgrown that our constitutional order has collapsed beneath it. I dont think what Washington needs, argues Cruz, is more compromise.
full article
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-gerson-a-compromised-reputation-among-the-gop/2013/09/26/fb52ddb8-26dd-11e3-ad0d-b7c8d2a594b9_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines