Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 08:50 PM Sep 2013

Maybe we SHOULD negotiate with the Rethugs over the debt ceiling.

And bring to the table our own ransom list, starting with Medicare for All.

Let's see. How about:

A doubling of the food stamp program
National $15 dollar minimum wage
An end to the Keystone Pipeline

What else goes on OUR wish list?

Maybe the other side would prefer a clean bill after all . . . .

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe we SHOULD negotiate with the Rethugs over the debt ceiling. (Original Post) pnwmom Sep 2013 OP
Single payer health care kairos12 Sep 2013 #1
Yes, that would be refreshing indeed. djean111 Sep 2013 #2
70% marginal tax rate on multimillionaires and billionaires meow2u3 Sep 2013 #3
and end the stupid sequester. summerschild Sep 2013 #4
K&R! Cha Sep 2013 #5
Meaningful firearm legislation elias7 Sep 2013 #6
Better yet Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #7
I have no idea what you mean. Obama should agree to delay Obamacare and adopt Romney's pnwmom Sep 2013 #8
Joke on the "they are against whatever he is for" game. nt NutmegYankee Sep 2013 #9
I wasn't being serious Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #10
LOL. Sorry I was slow on the uptake. pnwmom Sep 2013 #12
K&R sheshe2 Sep 2013 #11
I like the way you think.......... nt Grey Sep 2013 #13
Can't do it. The Republicans won't let our "leaders" in DC do it. blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #14
Quibbles. Igel Sep 2013 #15
TTP and Cease and Desist on carbon emissions. 400 pts/mil now. lonestarnot Sep 2013 #16

meow2u3

(24,761 posts)
3. 70% marginal tax rate on multimillionaires and billionaires
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 09:06 PM
Sep 2013

Expanding affirmative action to include persons over 40, poor and low-income people regardless of race, and the disabled, for starters.
Full restoration of the Voting Rights Act, plus expanding the VRA to outlaw discrimination on the bases of sex, age, and disability.
Ending "corporate welfare" as we know it.
Steep tax hikes on the rich.
Repeal any and all "right to work" laws, criminalize union busting.
Prosecution of executive boards of banks and corporations who tanked the economy
Prosecution of the Koch Bros. for seditious conspiracy

This is not an exhaustive list.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
8. I have no idea what you mean. Obama should agree to delay Obamacare and adopt Romney's
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 11:36 PM
Sep 2013

whole economic plan?

Huh?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
10. I wasn't being serious
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 11:46 PM
Sep 2013

Just being snarky by pointing out how Repubs are against something as soon as President Obama is for it


Don't worry. I haven't gone crazy......yet

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
14. Can't do it. The Republicans won't let our "leaders" in DC do it.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 03:33 AM
Sep 2013
Sorry. We're on a short leash. Can't be seen as rocking the boat, partisan. That below us!!!

Igel

(35,300 posts)
15. Quibbles.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 09:50 AM
Sep 2013

1. The food stamp program cuts aren't in $--that's how the media reports things. For them, all things are money. It would cut the amount paid by the government for food stamps by removing waivers put in place as a result of the recession and restore things pretty much to how they were in 2007. If you're adult and able bodied you need to volunteer or be in a training program.

The comparable way to increase the amount spent would be to remove even more restrictions so even more people qualify. Which gets us back to how things were in the mid-1990s.

2. That's doable, but people on both sides like to cite only studies that support their position. It's a strange science and odd critical thinking that seeks first proof while seeking to avoid challenge to the idea. What would the effect be on the common good? Unknown, if only because no good controlled experiments have been done. (And, yes, people will cite studies. But people on both sides like to cite only studies that support their position. It's a strange ...)

3. Obama's said that the pipeline is in his jurisdiction, not Congress', so this "demand" would undermine his own authority. Granted, the Constitution says otherwise, but Congress has been asleep at the switch so long that it's easy to understand how a scholar with Obama's record of research in Constitutional law could make the mistake. Or, more to the point, how a president--any president--would want to appropriate as much power to his office as possible.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maybe we SHOULD negotiate...