Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 01:53 PM Nov 2013

Hillary Clinton is the most formidable presidential frontrunner in modern era

Hillary Clinton remains the most formidable presidential nomination frontrunner for a non-incumbent in the modern era. As I wrote about last year, Clinton’s combination of a number of factors made her strength pretty much unprecedented. Clinton has, if anything, become stronger over the last 12 months."

*The only candidate anywhere close to Clinton was Al Gore for 2000. Gore had long been in the upper 40s to mid 50s. Gore went on to waltz to the nomination in the single strongest non-incumbent performance in the modern era. He won every single primary and took 76% of the primary vote.

Clinton’s numbers look a lot more like an incumbent. Bush was in the low 70s for 1992. Clinton was in the low 60s to low 70s for 1996. Obama mostly was in the low to mid 60s for 2012, even when matched up against Hillary Clinton."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/09/hillary-clinton-is-the-most-formidable-presidential-frontrunner-in-modern-era/

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton is the most formidable presidential frontrunner in modern era (Original Post) damnedifIknow Nov 2013 OP
Oh boy, here we go........contrarians at 3...2...1 Beacool Nov 2013 #1
Why not? HappyMe Nov 2013 #2
I do not want another DLC president... awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #3
The stories are media generated. Beacool Nov 2013 #4
LOL, says the cheerleader with the Hillary photo! nt Logical Nov 2013 #14
this primary season is going to be hell for you, Bea. take this, you'll need it! dionysus Nov 2013 #15
That's original!!! Beacool Nov 2013 #16
you'll need all the bankies you can get the next few years, i'm afraid. better clear out some room dionysus Nov 2013 #17
Yep, I'll need to clear soem of the furniture out the way. Beacool Nov 2013 #19
* admires beas new bankie from afar * bunnies Nov 2013 #30
better be really far! dionysus Nov 2013 #32
Hands behind my back and everything! bunnies Nov 2013 #34
The Phillipines will soon be open for business! Whisp Nov 2013 #5
I need more explanation of your post... Agschmid Nov 2013 #7
A link here: Whisp Nov 2013 #9
Thanks. Agschmid Nov 2013 #10
Hillary on Haiti - The One Stop For Investors. Whisp Nov 2013 #31
I think we need a woman president. It is getting embarrassing that we never had a female CTyankee Nov 2013 #6
It's like a monarchy... Agschmid Nov 2013 #8
I want a woman as president as well in my lifetime davidpdx Nov 2013 #24
2008 was different. She was competing against what would be the first black presidency. CTyankee Nov 2013 #25
I think it could be argued both were transforming candidates davidpdx Nov 2013 #33
tell that to the mid east DonCoquixote Nov 2013 #29
that foot in mouth disease she has must run in the family. Whisp Nov 2013 #35
*sigh* I didn't say everybody in the world. Who would ever expect that of any candidate? CTyankee Nov 2013 #36
Will just make me work harder against her bigwillq Nov 2013 #11
Hillary Lamonte Nov 2013 #12
Stifles another huge yawn. Sognefjord Nov 2013 #13
lol. Sez Bill. n/t Whisp Nov 2013 #18
Ask Howard Dean what numbers mean this far out. DFW Nov 2013 #20
This is just intimidation at this point. Nothing more. Whisp Nov 2013 #21
Helen was indeed a good friend. DFW Nov 2013 #23
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #22
OK caine1969 Nov 2013 #26
She will need the Banks and Wall Street to win highmindedhavi Nov 2013 #27
So formidable her numbers are compared with Gore's? Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #28

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
16. That's original!!!
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 02:43 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Mon Nov 11, 2013, 05:02 PM - Edit history (1)

First penguin bankie for my collection.

Thank you, sweets!!!




dionysus

(26,467 posts)
17. you'll need all the bankies you can get the next few years, i'm afraid. better clear out some room
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 02:45 PM
Nov 2013

in the den...

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
19. Yep, I'll need to clear soem of the furniture out the way.
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 05:01 PM
Nov 2013

We'll just have to sit on the bankies.




CTyankee

(63,889 posts)
6. I think we need a woman president. It is getting embarrassing that we never had a female
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 05:50 PM
Nov 2013

chief of state. I am willing to back Hillary. I know a candidate further left might not make it and I want to see what she can do with the presidency. Now that Warren has lined up for her, why can't we accept her judgment on this?

I think Hillary would enter the office of President with the backing of the free world and we would be highly regarded for electing her by people all over the globe.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
8. It's like a monarchy...
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 07:24 PM
Nov 2013

But I am a supporter... And I get maybe that not a legitimate reason to not/support someone.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
24. I want a woman as president as well in my lifetime
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:21 AM
Nov 2013

I don't necessarily think it has to be Hilary Clinton though. I'd rather have someone more progressive, less hawkish, and with less DLC ties. I would gladly back a woman running for president as a Democrat. In the 2016 primary I will not vote for her.

I also disagree with her being the most formidable front runner in modern history. She was suppose to be that in 2008 and it was proved untrue. Her campaign imploded so badly that she lost credibility as a candidate. I don't think you get a second shot at history.

By the way South Korea, which has a shorter history of democracy has elected a women president. Women in Korea tend to face more scrutinize because the country is a male dominated society. I wasn't very surprised she was elected given she is powerful, was the daughter of a dictator and had the party's backing.

CTyankee

(63,889 posts)
25. 2008 was different. She was competing against what would be the first black presidency.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:40 AM
Nov 2013

We probably won't have something that transforming in 2016. In fact, SHE will be the tranforming candidate.

But 2016 is a long time away. She could have a scandal or get sick and who knows might step into the fray? I would hope it would be another woman, either Warren or Gillibrand or another good female candidate...lots can happen between now and then.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
33. I think it could be argued both were transforming candidates
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:50 PM
Nov 2013

If she were the only one that would benefit her greatly. I need to spend more time looking at candidate profiles as I'm not as up on that kind of information anymore with my heavy doctoral load.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
29. tell that to the mid east
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 02:14 PM
Nov 2013

"I think Hillary would enter the office of President with the backing of the free world and we would be highly regarded for electing her by people all over the globe. "

The mid east will not be happy with the person that gloated over killing gaddafi.

Lamonte

(85 posts)
12. Hillary
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 11:48 PM
Nov 2013

She is a proverbial lock. It will be entertaining to see what kind of lies the conservatives will use against her.

DFW

(54,277 posts)
20. Ask Howard Dean what numbers mean this far out.
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 08:06 PM
Nov 2013

I don't care if she is running at 99% of some poll. Three years before an election, they mean about as much as a prediction of what the weather will be like in three years.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
21. This is just intimidation at this point. Nothing more.
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 01:43 AM
Nov 2013

So far the 'nominee' is the only one talking about herself, basically.

btw, do you know if Dean was one of those that took that Clinton loyalty oath way back in 92?

oh, and btw, I read here you were a personal friend of Helen Thomas - I loved her too.

DFW

(54,277 posts)
23. Helen was indeed a good friend.
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 03:31 AM
Nov 2013

She and my father were colleagues in the Washington print press, so I had known her for about 50 years, i.e. most of my life.

In 1992, I don't think Howard was overly concerned about some oath. He had just become governor of Vermont by surprise (the governor had died of a heart attack, and he was LG), and had other things on his mind. However, I don't know this, and I'm not about to wake him up to ask (it's 8:30 in the morning here, which is 2:30 AM in North America's eastern parts--although he could be anywhere, knowing Howard).

Response to damnedifIknow (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton is the mo...