2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama never lied about your plan
Terminated policies were introduced after ACA's passing -- often with insurers' knowledge they'd be scrapped
DEAN BAKER, ALTERNET
President Obama has been getting a lot of grief in the last few weeks over his pledge that with the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in place, people would be able to keep their insurance if they like it. The media have been filled with stories about people across the country who are having their insurance policies terminated, ostensibly because they did not meet the requirements of the ACA. While this has led many to say that Obama was lying, there is much less here than meets the eye.
First, it is important to note that the ACA grand-fathered all the individual policies that were in place at the time the law was enacted. This means that the plans in effect at the time that President Obama was pushing the bill could still be offered even if they did not meet all the standards laid out in the ACA.
The plans being terminated because they dont meet the minimal standards were all plans that insurers introduced after the passage of the ACA. Insurers introduced these plans knowing that they would not meet the standards that would come into effect in 2014. Insurers may not have informed their clients at the time they sold these plans that they would not be available after 2014 because they had designed a plan that did not comply with the ACA.
However if the insurers didnt tell their clients that the new plans would only be available for a short period of time, the blame would seem to rest with the insurance companies, not the ACA. After all, President Obama did not promise people that he would keep insurers from developing new plans that will not comply with the provisions of the ACA.
In addition to the new plans that were created that did not comply with the terms of the ACA, there have been complaints that the grandfathering was too strict. For example, insurers can only raise their premiums or deductibles by a small amount above the rate of medical inflation. As a result, many of the plans in existence at the time of the ACA are losing their grandfathered status.
full article
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/15/no_obama_didnt_lie_to_you_about_your_health_care_plan_partner/
Whisp
(24,096 posts)way more fun in that.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)his administration certainly failed massively in predicting just how sickening insurance companies can be
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Its not enough to do the right thing. Or to try and mitigate many of the bad things the other side is doing.
Nope. You have to predict, and prevent, every possible scenario. All of them.
If not ... its all your fault.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)do you not see ANYWHERE it could have been improved? AT ALL?????
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)of courses on gut reaction faux outrage, hyperbole and foul mouthed comments to make on DU.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)I mean, that is just fucking sad
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)if you did not use it in every miserable fucking sentence.
See what I did there?
go back, Joe, and LOOK AT MY POSTS since this debacle - go on - LOOK and STOP ASSUMING SHIT
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Look, I understand why the media takes every mess and then focuses on how the President caused it.
Or, it's his fault because he did not stop them, or predict their next insane action.
But I'm not sure why DU ends up playing along.
The media freaks out, and DU follows along.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)and elected officials. All though I've been involved in Party politics for 50+ years, I think I first witnessed the craziness of the "hair on fire" gene during the Clinton administration, when Congressional Democrats allowed themselves to be stampeded into accepting Ken Starr's "investigative report". There have been plenty of other instances (most tragically the rush to war with Iraq and Afghanistan) but it's all ways nerve wracking to witness our party follow some Pied Piper and take the leap off the cliff.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)making sure Obama comes out smelling like roses!!!
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)yeah, that's all it is
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)you are better than that
I am simply sick of people who pretend everything is roses - this was a high profile and easily avoidable fuckup
is it as bad as senseless war and a crashed economy? NO - but anything that gives ammunition to conservative assholes is NOT GOOD
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)have been clearer about the 5% in the shitty individual plans, and has gone the extra step of an executive action to allow the insurance companies to continue the shitty plans for another year even if created AFTER the law was adopted.
And Obama has also said his '09 stump speech was speaking to EVERYONE in group plans, public plans, etc. to reassure them there would be little or no disruption to them. That is just how I interpreted it at the time. He wasn't just talking to the 5% in junk plans. But yes, he should have clarified the caveats with the JUNK PLAN individual market. He SHOULD have said this in his stump:
"NOW folks, for about 95% of you there will be little or no change in your insurance program. If you like what you have now, you will just keep it. That means all you folks in employee group plans, public plans, etc. For the rest of you in the individual market, if you like you current plan, your insurance company can continue it once the new law is passed and you can keep it. But after that, all NEW plans will have to meet new standards so that this part of the market offers better insurance and becomes more stable. You will be able to shop from your current insurance company or go on the exchange and get a new plan, many of you with subsidies. You'll get better insurance at a good rate."
So yes, we get it and Obama gets it. But he did not "lie". And we don't have to keep harping on it and being nasty about it. He has owned it, has apologized, has worked to fix it, and now let's go make the new law work.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)and then accuse others of being NASTY?
appacom
(296 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Don't step out of line, sing loudly from the hymnal and hit all the right notes, or you'll face incoming fire, while honest, reality-based discussion is lost in the haze.
When all a poster can do is attack, you know immediately they have nothing of substance to offer. But don't let the lockstep cheerleaders or their insults bug you, Skittles. They don't run the place, as you know.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)the TeaLeft.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)...even if there's evidence to the contrary.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)it any different.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)everybody wins when insurance companies
are allowed to take actions that
allow them to get rid of undesireables.
(um, maybe not quite everybody)
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)rw bullshit.
thanks DV