Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBlue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes
Blue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes
Top officials from past presidential campaigns have quietly formed a group to push for major changes in the general election debates, with recommendations expected by late spring.
The working group is questioning the debates format, moderator-selection process and location: Might a TV studio make more sense than a college town? Members said a major goal is to make more allowance for changing technology and the rise of social media. A likely recommendation is an earlier start for the debates, in response to the increase in absentee voting.
Members include the longtime lead debate negotiator for each party: Bob Bauer for Democratic nominees and Ben Ginsberg for the Republicans. So the Annenberg Working Group on Presidential General Election Debates could have a profound effect on the signature fall events of the race for the White House. The groups co-chairs were top debate-prep advisers to each of the 2012 nominees: Anita Dunn for President Obama, and Beth Myers for Mitt Romney.
The group is sponsored by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, debate expert and the centers director, leads the study.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/general-election-debate-changes-group-100428.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1125 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
OP
They had to take it away from them, they were letting third party candidates sneak in... n/t
PoliticAverse
Nov 2013
#3
Warpy
(111,222 posts)1. Give it back to the League of Women Voters
Candidates were discouraged from spewing canned speeches when they ran it. If they tried, they were picked apart during the rebuttal.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)3. They had to take it away from them, they were letting third party candidates sneak in... n/t
Warpy
(111,222 posts)4. Yes, I know, how shameful!
Stupid and corrupt asses need to give it back.
longship
(40,416 posts)2. More Republican primary debates!!!!
I want the TV schedule chock-a-block with them throughout 2016. More! MORE!!!!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)5. "Blue Ribbon?" OOpppss better run for the hills..
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)6. are we gonna get screwed in this? n/t