Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 01:49 AM Nov 2013

Blue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes


Blue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes

Top officials from past presidential campaigns have quietly formed a group to push for major changes in the general election debates, with recommendations expected by late spring.

The working group is questioning the debates’ format, moderator-selection process and location: Might a TV studio make more sense than a college town? Members said a major goal is to make more allowance for changing technology and the rise of social media. A likely recommendation is an earlier start for the debates, in response to the increase in absentee voting.

Members include the longtime lead debate negotiator for each party: Bob Bauer for Democratic nominees and Ben Ginsberg for the Republicans. So the Annenberg Working Group on Presidential General Election Debates could have a profound effect on the signature fall events of the race for the White House. The group’s co-chairs were top debate-prep advisers to each of the 2012 nominees: Anita Dunn for President Obama, and Beth Myers for Mitt Romney.

The group is sponsored by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, debate expert and the center’s director, leads the study.

-snip-

Full article here: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/general-election-debate-changes-group-100428.html


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blue-ribbon group pushes for 2016 debate changes (Original Post) Tx4obama Nov 2013 OP
Give it back to the League of Women Voters Warpy Nov 2013 #1
They had to take it away from them, they were letting third party candidates sneak in... n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #3
Yes, I know, how shameful! Warpy Nov 2013 #4
More Republican primary debates!!!! longship Nov 2013 #2
"Blue Ribbon?" OOpppss better run for the hills.. pangaia Nov 2013 #5
are we gonna get screwed in this? n/t LiberalElite Nov 2013 #6

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
1. Give it back to the League of Women Voters
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 01:56 AM
Nov 2013

Candidates were discouraged from spewing canned speeches when they ran it. If they tried, they were picked apart during the rebuttal.

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. More Republican primary debates!!!!
Thu Nov 28, 2013, 02:06 AM
Nov 2013

I want the TV schedule chock-a-block with them throughout 2016. More! MORE!!!!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Blue-ribbon group pushes ...