2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf a zygote is a person, like the right wants to think
Can that zygote be taken as a dependent on your income tax return? All that would be required is a name and social security number of the zygote. If it is challenged in tax court and you lose due to the court saying that zygote is not a person, can you then challenge it in a higher court thru Citizen's United. A zygote is more of a person than a corporation is a person. A corporation does not file a personal income tax return like a normal person does, nor was it conceived as humans are conceived, therefore, based upon a corporation not being a zygote or a human that files a personal income tax return, a corporation would appear to not be a person and therefore, not be allowed the right of free speech.
Any thoughts?
shenmue
(38,506 posts)For instance, we all have countless tiny 'people' living in our hoo-has.
mockmonkey
(2,815 posts)is coming up with names for all of them.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Resurrection comes via incorporation.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)if she has regular periods?
RC
(25,592 posts)for those future "little people" to developed and grow into real babies, which when born, they can then ignore, while punishing the women for obviously enjoying herself too much.
It doesn't have to make sense, we are talking about Conservatives here now.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)The right- who vociferously opposes government assistance programs- might not (probably doesn't) completely grasp all of the implications of their push for personhood for products of conception.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Women who are with child. Prenatal care is good for the baby
OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)The right has no idea what they are leading this into. All it takes is someone younger than me that has a family young enough to be able to have another child and have young children. This way, the theory would be tested by one family. I hope it happens.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And that date must be in the past.
OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)the birthdate of a zygote is at conception. So, once that is determined, that would be the birthdate.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Especially since birth date has a legal definition.
It also marks the date the right-wing stops caring about the person.
OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)I have known those who only put in "pending" and had their taxes accepted. Maybe that's the route to take. That way the zygote could be a deduction while not having had a social security number. Maybe the same would be true for birthdate. Just put in "pending."
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)so dudes don't owe any taxes, right? Millions of deductions every year
OLDMDDEM
(1,572 posts)wow. Wouldn't that blow the brains out of an IRS auditor.