Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 08:27 PM Dec 2013

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Supreme Court Justices Should Stay If They're Able To Work


12/17/13 02:22 PM ET EST AP

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Supreme Court Justices Should Stay If They're Able To Work

RESTON, Va. (AP) — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says Supreme Court justices should work as long as they can and shouldn't manipulate their retirement so a like-minded president can appoint their successor.

Some liberals have recently called on the 80-year-old Ginsburg to retire so that President Barack Obama can choose her replacement. If she stays beyond his term, it would leave open the possibility that a Republican would name the liberal justice's successor.

But Ginsburg, the oldest justice on the court, cited Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall on Tuesday as two liberal justices who left their replacement to Republican successor presidents. Ginsburg said she supposed many people wanted both men to leave when a Democrat was president, but she noted that neither did.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/17/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court_n_4460255.html


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Supreme Court Justices Should Stay If They're Able To Work (Original Post) Tx4obama Dec 2013 OP
and it was a huge ass mistake dsc Dec 2013 #1
Ruth yeoman6987 Dec 2013 #3
Good grief! Very selfish imo. polichick Dec 2013 #2

dsc

(52,152 posts)
1. and it was a huge ass mistake
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 09:37 PM
Dec 2013

Both should have retired when Carter was in office but didn't or failing that they should have held on until Clinton was in office.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
3. Ruth
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 12:07 PM
Dec 2013

Is she preparing us for the possibility that she is staying beyond 2017? It sorta sounds like that. I am pretty confident that we will have a Democratic President in 2016, but a Democratic Senate? Not as much. Which means that even if she leaves in 2020 with a Democratic President, we may not get a left progressive Supreme Judge to replace her. Of course all of this is hypothetical. Our best chances for a progressive replacement is between today and January 2015 quite frankly.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Supr...