Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 10:24 PM Jan 2014

Federal Court Upholds Connecticut Gun Control Law


Federal Court Upholds Connecticut Gun Control Law

January 30, 2014, 6:54 PM EST

A federal district court on Thursday upheld a Connecticut gun control law that expanded the state's assault weapons ban, created a dangerous weapon offender registry and formed new rules for buying ammunition, the Hartford Courant reported.

"The court concludes that the legislation is constitutional," Judge Alfred Covello wrote in the decision. "While the act burdens the plaintiffs' Second Amendment rights, it is substantially related to the important governmental interest of public safety and crime control."

The law was passed and signed by Gov. Dannel Malloy last year in the wake of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and went into effect at the beginning of 2014.

A group of gun owners challenged the law, claiming that it violated the Second Amendment. Covello, a Republican appointee, rebutted their claims and said that the law was meant to provide for public safety.

-snip-

Full post here: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/court-upholds-connecticut-gun-control-law


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Court Upholds Connecticut Gun Control Law (Original Post) Tx4obama Jan 2014 OP
Good for Connecticut Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #1
Kiss my ass, gun-crazies!!! Aristus Jan 2014 #2
Sounds like a good balancing of interests by the court. Paladin Jan 2014 #3
Fights over restrictions on the 2A are primarily political, not legal fights hack89 Jan 2014 #5
CT really had no choice hack89 Jan 2014 #4
Applause otohara Jan 2014 #6

Aristus

(66,254 posts)
2. Kiss my ass, gun-crazies!!!
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jan 2014


Good for Connecticut. At least they care about the victims of Sandy Hook...

Paladin

(28,241 posts)
3. Sounds like a good balancing of interests by the court.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jan 2014

Not even Scalia claimed that the 2nd Amendment was immune to restrictions.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. Fights over restrictions on the 2A are primarily political, not legal fights
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:11 AM
Jan 2014

because you are absolutely right that the 2A can be restricted.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
4. CT really had no choice
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:10 AM
Jan 2014

politically it was impossible not to pass stricter laws.

I will point out that the new AWB would not have stopped Sandy Hook. It is not retroactive and Lanza's gun was registered with the state. Large capacity mags are still legal if they are also registered.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Federal Court Upholds Con...