Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:20 AM Mar 2014

Mitt Romney's Critique of Obama's (and Clinton's) Foreign Policy Focuses on the 'What Ifs'

PHILIP BUMP

Two-time (-and-counting?) Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney wrote an opinion piece for Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that hammers President Obama (and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) for not taking advantage of opportunities to shift the direction of our current international crises. People missing the chance to change directions weighs heavily on Romney, it seems.

Romney uses the situation in Crimea as an opportunity to criticize Obama's foreign policy track record. "Over these past five years," he writes, "there was a point when America had good choices and good options" on issues like Crimea and Syria and Egypt. But we missed or flubbed them, leaving America's hands "tied" and leaving America to "wring our hands" — a sure recipe for rope burn when combined together. "[W]e failed to act at the propitious point; that moment having passed, we were left without acceptable options," Romney laments.

There's no doubt that hindsight offers good opportunities to identify points at which good options and bad options existed. In 2011, Romney writes, "the time was ripe for us to bring together moderate leaders" in Syria "who would have been easy enough for us to identify ... and to see that the rebels were well armed." That's 2014 Romney speaking. On the 2011 campaign trail, Romney called for "using the bullhorn of the presidency" to speak out "while voices of freedom and dissent are under attack." He also suggested that "regime change is what's going to be necessary in that setting," with "covert and overt activities to encourage voices of dissent." Of course Romney lacked the advantage of hindsight that he currently enjoys.

As soon as you see Romney's byline on an article challenging the president, you have to wonder: Is a third presidential campaign in the works? Last weekend, Romney played host to a number of his 2012 advisors at a retreat in Park City, Utah — a retreat that was by all accounts a group of friends reuniting for a pleasant outing. But Romney's pointed inclusion of Hillary Clinton in the Journal piece is hard to ignore.

President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton traveled the world in pursuit of their promise to reset relations and to build friendships across the globe. Their failure has been painfully evident: It is hard to name even a single country that has more respect and admiration for America today than when President Obama took office, and now Russia is in Ukraine.

more
http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/03/mitt-romneys-critique-obamas-foreign-policy-focuses-what-ifs/359275/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney's Critique of Obama's (and Clinton's) Foreign Policy Focuses on the 'What Ifs' (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2014 OP
Romney knows no more about foreign policy than Bush did. Thor_MN Mar 2014 #1
romney is a idiot. pay no attention. mgcgulfcoast Mar 2014 #2
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mitt Romney's Critique of...