Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:25 PM Mar 2014

Guns Are Far More Likely to Be Used in Suicide Than in Killing Bad Guys



According to the CDC, 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun in 2010, the latest year for which data are available. That same year, meanwhile, the FBI recorded only 230 justifiable homicides (the legal term) in which a private citizen used a firearm to kill a felon during the commission of a felony.

Suicide is the second-leading cause of death for people under 35, and the Harvard School of Public Health has found that "suicide rates among children, women and men of all ages are higher in states where more households have guns." More than six in 10 of the firearm deaths in the past decade were suicides, not homicides. 

And if you're set on ending your life, a gun is the surest way to do it. Eighty-five percent of people who shoot themselves die, versus 1 percent of people who cut themselves and 2 percent of those who attempt to overdose.

"Removing all firearms from one's home is one of the most effective and straightforward steps that household decision-makers can take to reduce the risk of suicide," Harvard health policy professor Matthew Miller said in 2007. "Removing firearms may be especially effective in reducing the risk of suicide among adolescents and other potentially impulsive members of their home."

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/03/guns-are-far-more-likely-to-be-used-in-suicide-than-in-killing-bad-guys/284537/

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns Are Far More Likely to Be Used in Suicide Than in Killing Bad Guys (Original Post) Redfairen Mar 2014 OP
If I kept a gun I would be dead by now. CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #1
Me too libodem Mar 2014 #8
If only you had a gun--you wouldn't have killed yourself! Arkana Mar 2014 #2
Why is killing the bad guy the only metric? hack89 Mar 2014 #3
And why is successful suicide the only metric MillennialDem Mar 2014 #5
Good questions. Lay out the hard numbers and lets talk about it. nt hack89 Mar 2014 #6
You forgot the one where the bad guy shoots and kills you. TeamPooka Mar 2014 #10
Irrelevant to the point the OP is trying to make hack89 Mar 2014 #11
no, I'm arguing that just having a gun puts you in more danger. TeamPooka Mar 2014 #13
Why? Criminals shoot unarmed people all the time hack89 Mar 2014 #14
Nitpick: guns are not the surest way. Jumping off a 500+ foot tall building is 99.9% or higher rate MillennialDem Mar 2014 #4
steps (don't click this if you're squeamish) steve2470 Mar 2014 #12
You're honestly trying to tell me that shooting yourself in the head is a more certain method of MillennialDem Mar 2014 #16
ok good point steve2470 Mar 2014 #17
My mom worked in an ER. Among many other stories she told me was a guy who survived gun barrel in MillennialDem Mar 2014 #18
Well, a pistol is easier to conceal than a 50-story building Orrex Mar 2014 #19
I said sorry to nitpick but the OP has this quote: MillennialDem Mar 2014 #20
Well, I guess I don't see the point of nit-picking, then. Orrex Mar 2014 #21
It seems like guns are more often than not used for anything BUT killing "bad guys" Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2014 #7
Murder Suicides otohara Mar 2014 #9
There are also thousands of accidental shootings TexasBushwhacker Mar 2014 #15

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
1. If I kept a gun I would be dead by now.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:36 PM
Mar 2014

I am far too suicidal for that and yeah I am not making a bad joke about it. Still here 35 years after my last "serious" attempt.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
8. Me too
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:19 PM
Mar 2014

I'm fairly stable right now and I know suicide is wrong, but I'm glad I don't have to make the decision, to have to make the choice. Seriously.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. Why is killing the bad guy the only metric?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:08 PM
Mar 2014

there are three other options:

1: The bad guy is only wounded - which is the more likely outcome giving how survivable gun shot wounds actually are.

2. Shots were fired but did not hit the bad guy, who then surrendered or ran away.

3. No shots were fired - the sight of the gun was enough to deter the bad guy.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
5. And why is successful suicide the only metric
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:07 PM
Mar 2014

what about all those who survive suicide by gun, those hurt or killed in accidents, those scared by a "good guy" with a gun acting tough, etc.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
11. Irrelevant to the point the OP is trying to make
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 01:50 PM
Mar 2014

unless you are making an argument that legal gun ownership is justified by violent acts by criminals.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. Why? Criminals shoot unarmed people all the time
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 03:29 PM
Mar 2014

and justifiable homicides are a very incomplete and inaccurate measure of the self defense value of a gun.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
4. Nitpick: guns are not the surest way. Jumping off a 500+ foot tall building is 99.9% or higher rate
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:06 PM
Mar 2014

of "success"

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
12. steps (don't click this if you're squeamish)
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 01:59 PM
Mar 2014

1- Make sure gun works properly
2- Make sure gun is loaded correctly
3- Put barrel of gun in one's mouth pointed exactly at one's brain

you get the rest of the grisly picture.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
16. You're honestly trying to tell me that shooting yourself in the head is a more certain method of
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 10:57 PM
Mar 2014

death than jumping off a 500+ foot tall building?

Outside of getting blown back in by the wind or missing and landing a floor or two down, a 500 foot fall (onto concrete) is certain, instant splatter.

A gunshot wound to the head is not certain (see Gabby Giffords and many other survivors) and perhaps more importantly even if fatal it's not always as instant as people make it out to be.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
17. ok good point
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 11:00 PM
Mar 2014

What I'm saying is, if you are really really trying to off yourself, my method usually does the job. I have to admit, yours is 100%. Mine might be 95% with a steady aim.

eta: I guess what I'm trying to say is, I've never heard of anyone surviving a gun barrel in the mouth pointed at your brain. I guess some people are extraordinarily unlucky, if you can call it that. Pretty horrible life to survive that.

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
18. My mom worked in an ER. Among many other stories she told me was a guy who survived gun barrel in
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 11:15 PM
Mar 2014

the mouth pointed at the brain.

Let me add it was a 12 gauge shotgun with a single projectile.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
19. Well, a pistol is easier to conceal than a 50-story building
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 08:39 AM
Mar 2014

And the assertion isn't that guns are the most efficient means of suicide imagineable.

The assertion is that, of the means most commonly chosen, a gun is the most efficient.


Did 19,392 people commit suicide by leaping from 50-story buildings in 2010? Why not, in your estimation?

 

MillennialDem

(2,367 posts)
20. I said sorry to nitpick but the OP has this quote:
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:38 AM
Mar 2014

"And if you're set on ending your life, a gun is the surest way to do it. Eighty-five percent of people who shoot themselves die, versus 1 percent of people who cut themselves and 2 percent of those who attempt to overdose."

I simply said that while a self inflicted gunshot is likely to be fatal, there are other methods that are even more likely to be fatal and also likely a quicker exit (even a GSW to the head is often not as instant as people make it out to be - common misconception is that you shoot yourself in the head and don't ever hear the trigger or feel pain. Sometimes true, not always. Some linger on for minutes or hours or days. Sometimes in pain and aware too).

As for the reason more people choose suicide by gun versus jumping off buildings:

a. Harder to back out / easier to just snap and do it in a fit of depression/suicidal ideation. I know, I've been there. Driving to a building, then taking the elevator up, then jumping would lead many to back off / reconsider.

b. Worry about interference from bystanders and first responders.

c. In my case, terrible fear of heights.

d. The terror of the 5-10 second fall (worry about regret etc)

e. Risk to people on the ground.

Anyway, there are a couple of other ways I can think that are also more likely to be successful and more likely to be quick than jumping off a building but they have their drawbacks as well.

Guns are the most common suicide method because they have this powerful combination: they are easy to access, private, "storable" for later (imagine driving to the same building 40 times while suicidal, rather than picking up the gun and playing with it and putting it back 40 times), and have a high fatality rate.

Not solely because they have a high fatality rate - because of the combination of factors. In places where guns are hard to access, hanging tends to be much more common for most of the same reasons as above.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
21. Well, I guess I don't see the point of nit-picking, then.
Wed Mar 26, 2014, 09:54 AM
Mar 2014

Jumping into a vat of molten steel or throwing yourself out of a spacecraft's airlock is also 100% guaranteed to work, but we don't generally include these in lists of "best ways to kill yourself," either.

Other than for the satisfaction of nit-picking, is there value in quibbling about which all-but-certain method of suicide is most likely to succeed?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
7. It seems like guns are more often than not used for anything BUT killing "bad guys"
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:24 PM
Mar 2014

Come to think of it, why DON'T we hear more stories about people actually using them to blow away bad guys? I mean, you'd think that the NRA would be hyping them more often. Not that I think that it NEVER happens but it always strikes me as being more of a fantasy than a reality most of the time.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,183 posts)
15. There are also thousands of accidental shootings
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 06:57 PM
Mar 2014

of gun owners shooting themselves or of shooting someone in the home. They aren't always fatal injuries, but I wouldn't want to shoot my child by accident. Then of course, there are the children that get their hands on the guns and shoot themselves or others.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/11/guns-child-deaths-more-than-cancer/2073259/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Guns Are Far More Likely ...