2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Claims Partisanship Is Taking The Country Backwards
NEW YORK (AP) Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday night that excessive partisanship flowing through the nation's political system is causing the U.S. to march "backwards instead of forward" and pointed to fall elections as a sign of how the country might tackle problems.
The former secretary of state reflected on her time at the State Department, the U.S. relationship with Russia and the advice she gives to young women during her appearance at the annual Women in the World summit. But when the moderator asked her to address the nation's future, Clinton cited the need to "get back to evidence-based decision-making."
"There is just pure ideology, pure partisanship. We disguise a commercial interest behind a political facade and the result is that we're kind of marching backwards instead of forward," Clinton said. She said the U.S. needs to address economic hardships facing many young people to produce an "inclusive prosperity."
The potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate noted that "we have an election coming up this year. And we ought to be paying attention to that because that will set the parameters for a lot of what can and should be done."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/03/hillary-clinton-partisanship_n_5088267.html
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Bland rhetoric designed not to piss off anybody.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)tolerate them and they're easy to swallow. Junk.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)perhaps people hear what they want to hear.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Gawd.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)Then everybody understood that parroting far left rhetoric will only get you elected president of DU. If you want to run for president you have to be prepared to reach out to the other side. Unless Democrats get off their asses and vote in 2014 and keep the Senate and take back the house.
Then anyone can run for president.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Incremental slashes instead of big ones.
Just campaign blather, so far.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... from her husband. The repeal of Glass-Stegall, the passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, NAFTA, DCMA, really Hillary, we cannot afford any more of this nonsense.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)that she is referring to Republicans, not Democrats (or "both sides" .
Whisp
(24,096 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)If she is referring to republicans she should have the guts to come out and say so.
If she is thinking of walking the tightrope between the parties it won't help her in the primaries. Democratic primary voters won't be happy with a candidate who spouts that turd way BS.
And if she starts babbling about a "more muscular foreign policy", she might as well just put an R after her name.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... for NAFTA, repealing Glass-Stegall and the Commodity Futures Modernation Act is in. They are all EPIC failures for everyone but the 1%.
GeorgeGist
(25,317 posts)LETS TRIANGULATE!
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)The partisan ways of obstruction the GOP has rendered upon the country is literally stalling if not causing regression in this country.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)and how we're losing our "stature" in the world- and they would know it because they are the ones bringing it about. When they make government so terribly dysfunctional and when they go out in public- in front of the world- and denounce the President for being "weak" and then they wonder why the rest of the world- and Putin- thinks of us being "weak" in turn? The Republicans have no trouble disrespecting the office when they are out of power but they sure as heck demand it when they are in power.
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)I hope to live long enough to hear our standard-bearer, whoever it is, say it and nothing but.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)If she Is running In 2016 why would she say this.
This shows the clintons have learned nothing. She will run In primarys like a general election candiate.
Bipartisan talk means she will be just like her husband. The bill Clinton traingulation which brought us deregurlation and defense of
marriage act will be norm of Hillary clinton Wh maybe she would give republicans repeal of Obamacare In Bipartisanship
If you think Obama has been too easy on Corporations what makes you think Hillary will be an Improvements
Bill Clinton threw single mothers to wolves with him signing the republican wellfare reform.
Many here agree Obama has tried way too much to work with republicans.Does anyone think Hillary would be any different or worse after speech like this.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)evidence-based = objective thinking rather than subjective-thinking which requires no evidence or proof.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)and which party for whom it is not.
certainot
(9,090 posts)beats all other periods in history in sustained partisanship, and it coincides perfectly with the formation of the 1200 strong rw radio monopoly- which the left has ignored
rw radio is the perfect tool (loud dominant and ignored by the left) for enforcing partisanship locally and nationally- pushing the loons in the primaries, shaming intimidating and purging moderates, and enforcing the lock-stepping.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Evidence based decision making.
Inclusive Prosperity.
Now I want to hear her ideas for promoting those things.
If it's imploring or corporate overlords to allow a few more crumbs to fall from their table then I'll call BS.
If it's raising the min wage, giving people more protections to unionize and making sure people are paid a living wage I'll send her a donation!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)"we have an election coming up this year. And we ought to be paying attention to that because that will set the parameters for a lot of what can and should be done."
The only Democracy we have is our one vote. Once elected, our 'Republic' takes over & the elected will do what they want.
I don't think Mrs. Clinton wants to run for President. But this year if the Ds don't turn out to vote and a bunch of Rs squeeker in and infest our Gov even worse, it won't matter who is President in 2016.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Who do you think she was referring to when she made these comments?
The former secretary of state reflected on her time at the State Department, the U.S. relationship with Russia and the advice she gives to young women during her appearance at the annual Women in the World summit. But when the moderator asked her to address the nation's future, Clinton cited the need to "get back to evidence-based decision-making."
"There is just pure ideology, pure partisanship. We disguise a commercial interest behind a political facade and the result is that we're kind of marching backwards instead of forward," Clinton said. She said the U.S. needs to address economic hardships facing many young people to produce an "inclusive prosperity."
The potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate noted that "we have an election coming up this year. And we ought to be paying attention to that because that will set the parameters for a lot of what can and should be done."
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I'm enjoying a quiet evening at home.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Like Bill did after 1994.
This proves she can't be a progressive president. Why pretend otherwise.
You deserve a better candidate, Bea.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)are not necessarily the same thing. There's a place and time for everything.
I'll worry about it when and if she runs.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)and that's what HER presidency would be like.
So much for the "she's going to be more progressive than he was" crowd. This proves them wrong.
elleng
(130,834 posts)Any hints about how we and she can get us back to 'sanity?'
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Some jobs just don't call for banging your fist on the table, dropping the F bomb, and sticking up your finger at them lol