2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYou Don't Have to Be a Racist to Practice Racism
ED KILGORE APRIL 9, 2014, 6:03 AM EDT
Nothing, but nothing, enrages conservatives more than being accused of racism.
Yes, a whole wing of modern conservatism is rooted in the southern white struggle against civil rights. Yes, Republican politicians perpetually appeal to resentment of the beneficiaries of the welfare state, commonly (if mistakenly) understood as people of color. Yes, nearly all conservative political actors and writers treat minority grievances as an illegitimate projection of past injustices far past their point of relevance. Yes, in nearly every state where the GOP has the power and incentive to do so, their legislators are systematically seeking to make it harder for minorities to vote. Yes, the tea party movement has a foundational myth that the housing and financial crises which touched off the Great Recession were the product of loans made to uncreditworthy minority folk via the Community Reinvestment Act at the behest of the black radical group ACORN. And yes, the centrist technocrat Barack Obama has often been subjected to classic racist stereotypes in day-to-day conservative agitprop, as an alleged beneficiary of affirmative action, as a shiftless vacation-taker, as a boon companion to (and even a husband of) black radicals, and yes, as a Kenyan with a neocolonial outlook.
Since we cannot peer into souls and because it is entirely possible to favor conservative policy positions with no racial animus whatsoever, none of this evidence, of course, means that it is accurate to describe any particular individual conservative as a racist. Some Republicans frankly argue that the heavy Democratic voting proclivities of African-Americans, Asian-Americans and (to a somewhat lesser extent) Hispanic-Americans all but force GOPers to promote policies everyone knows have a disproportionate impact on minorities; why shouldnt Republicans tend to their own bleached constituencies insofar as people of color wont give their views a fair shake? More popular still is the theory (particularly beloved by the small tribe of African-American conservatives, but also alluded to by big-time figures like Paul Ryan and Rand Paul) that the Rights deep sympathy for minority Americans requires a fight to liberate them from the Democratic Party plantation, where they are confined via dependence on government largesse (National Reviews Kevin Williamson has even argued that the welfare state was a conscious successor to Jim Crow).
And so, protestations of pure motives accompany even the most suspect of policies and messages and intensify the conservative cries of unfair! and race card! when the r-word is attributed to their words and deeds if not their thoughts. It has reached the point where the very idea of racism other than the racism of liberals playing the race card has been delegitimized on the right.
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/you-don-t-have-to-be-a-racist-to-practice-racism
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)institutionalized racism. Nobody wants to be called a 'racist' or think of themselves as one, and because people use 'racist' sloppily to mean 'racial bigot', so many white people even on the left simply dig in their heels and deny that racism is still embedded in virtually every aspect of American society. They feel like they're being 'accused', so they refuse to even take the time to understand how various policies directly disadvantage minorities, and cheer a 'black President' as 'post-racial' while ignoring wealth inequalities and unemployment rate disparities and health disparities and education disparities and on and on and on...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Great point. And sadly, the heel digging includes resisting the/any attempt to place the use of the term "racist" in its proper context.
It saddens me to watch (liberals) acknowledge Institutional racism (i.e., a cultural and systematic race-based oppressive structure) AND argue that the culturally and structurally disempowered can somehow practice racism against the non-disempowered group.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Well.....I hate to break it to you, mon ami, but it actually CAN happen; but yes, the fact is, People of Color CAN be individually racist. Is it as common as white racism? No, not by a long shot. But, honestly, for someone to ignore individual racism on the part of someone. or to pass that off as something less than racism just because that person may be in a disadvantaged group(such as Louis Farrakhan for example, who may be considered doubly disadvantaged because he is a PoC and of the Islamic faith), is truly a disservice to all, and not only that, but it also provides cannon fodder for the right-wing, especially Teabagger types(I've seen that happen all too often).
I mean, this isn't a slam on you or anything, so I hope you won't take this the wrong way. But it needed to be said.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)THERE IS NO SUCH ANIMAL AS "INDIVIDUAL RACISM", there is; however, "individual BIGOTRY."
race-based Bigotry, with no Institutional/cultural/systemic power, is Bigotry; race-based Bigotry, with Institutional/cultural/systemic power, is Racism.
How so? The Minister Farrakhan is (arguably) a bigot; but is wholly without any power to do anything to white people except call them names and/or hurt their feelings.
Cannon fodder for the right-wing? Aren't they using their cultural/institutional/systemic power, e.g., the power to define terms in a manner so as to support/benefit them, to make the exact same argument as you?
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)
Cannon fodder for the right-wing? Aren't they using their cultural/institutional/systemic power, e.g., the power to define terms in a manner so as to support/benefit them, to make the exact same argument as you?
I'm sorry, but that's just wrong. That's not a right-wing argument at all(nor does it "benefit" anybody); facts can't be partisan, ya know. But then again, you could at least try to explain why you think it IS a definitively right-wing argument.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that is the opinion of the sociologists that research and write about the idea.
And yes, the dictionary/wiki definition of racism/racist does benefit, i.e., helps maintain, the current societal structure.
I have not called it a right-wing argument as it is just as prevalent on the left.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)It kinda sounded like you were, TBH. My apologies if that wasn't the case, though.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)go away.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Everyone came down on me HARD every time I pointed out this truth in the Trayvon Martin case...
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)to be an "accidental racist". Now, don't get me wrong, I think Mr. Kilgore does make some good points here, including the fact that non-racists may occasionally end up supporting racist policies, and they may not know that it's racist. All I'm saying is that we do need to be careful if we want to win over voters to our side of the fence.
With that said, there's definitely plenty of food for thought. Thanks DonViejo.