Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 10:44 AM Apr 2014

Send In Bill Clinton to Save the Democratic Midterm Campaign

Robert Shrum

Months away from Election Day, the Democrats are already cutting and running away from Obamacare. Clinton is the man to help them embrace it, attack obsessed Republicans—and win.

With Democrats facing a daunting midterm season, it’s time to bring in the Big Dawg, not just as a campaigner but as a strategic driving force with the resources to deploy and dominate the message wars from coast to coast. Put him in charge of one of the existing super PACs—which would instantly multiply its fundraising—or form a new one that can operate on a genuinely super scale, with a pervasive reach. Let the Republicans have Karl Rove and Sheldon Adelson, the gambling mogul who in 2012 seemed to have all the electoral magic of a muggle. They, and the Koch brothers, would prove no match in messaging for Bill Clinton—and he’s the best chance to come close to matching them financially by attracting money beyond the Obama true believers among the big givers and the grass roots.

Why Clinton?

First, he has the right instinct about a year in which a platoon of Democrats appear to think—it’s not really thinking but reflex desperation—that they can run by hiding from health-care reform. Clinton has already rebuked that reflex, advising his party’s candidates that they “have to turn in toward all the controvers[y] and embrace it”—just as he did in a spectacular tour de force from the podium of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. He didn’t make what he calls “the terrible mistake” of “shy[ing] away from the health care deal.”

Clinton had to live with the consequences when too many Democrats contrived to flee their own history in the 1994 midterm contest that followed the failure of his health-care plan. So many of them lost that the party lost both the House and the Senate. Clinton understands that the last refuge of Democratic fear and trembling is to pretend you’re not really a Democrat, or not that much of a Democrat—and that the last thing we need, this year or then, is two Republican parties. The real Republicans will win out every time.

Four years later, he learned—or taught—another lesson during another midterm election. In 1998, the Democratic establishment was terrified to confront the GOP elephant stomping down the campaign trail. Democratic candidates were talking about anything and everything—except impeachment. Clinton himself had practiced the politics of triangulation during his reelection, although he prevailed primarily because of a fast-rising economy and the Gingrich-engineered government shutdown. But in 1998, he sensed the urgency and the utility of taking impeachment on directly—and certainly not defensively. Frustrated by conventional wisdom that routinely dismissed the notion as strategic malpractice, he was energized and engaged as an independent expenditure, spearheaded by a major contributor named Danny Abraham, prepared to go on the air just a week before Election Day to indict the GOP for wasting months and millions on their relentless pursuit of political revenge. I was a political consultant then, and my partners and I were producing the ads. The president of the United States was phoning our office with his “suggestions.” He is not only a hell of a speech-giver but a hell of a scriptwriter.

more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/14/send-in-bill-clinton-to-save-the-democratic-midterm-campaign.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
5. Yeah, the one who left office with the highest approval ratings in a very long time.
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 03:21 PM
Apr 2014

Higher than even St. Ronnie's.

Focus on the present.



 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
7. yes let's focus on the present =- move forward you might say, let's not remember the
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 03:38 PM
Apr 2014

past let's forget nafta and the repeal of glass steagal etc. let's not look back at gwb's torture illegal wars looks move on past the nsa's wiretapping let's just focus on the present . sleep sheeple sleep.


'higher than even St. Ronnie's.' yes b/c people didnt realize just how fucked billy got them untill they lost everything

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
8. What does any of that have to do with Bill campaigning for Democrats?
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 04:28 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Mon Apr 14, 2014, 10:55 PM - Edit history (1)

He is very popular and his help is needed. Your dislike of him is irrelevant, the party needs him and many Democrats who are in danger of losing their seats would love to have him campaign for them.

BlueDemKev

(3,003 posts)
12. Bill Clinton is a TREMENDOUS Asset to the Democratic Party
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 10:52 PM
Apr 2014

No, he didn't get every single thing right during his presidency, but his moderate, left-of-center philosophy was certainly preferable to the agenda of Newt Gingrich and today's tea party.

Clinton remains enormously popular and can really help progressive Democrats win statewide races throughout the country.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
3. The democrats need to make an issue of what's not being done...
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:07 PM
Apr 2014

I think Obama did a pretty good job of that in 2012. When he said things such as: "There's a jobs bill sitting around waiting for congress to pass it" - that kind of thing.

There's no real need in sucking up to Obamacare. Sure it's positive - the candidates shouldn't run from it, but they shouldn't dwell on it either, because it's polarizing. They need to talk about what congress COULD be working on.

Clinton would be really good for that, Howard Dean too. They need to speak of things to spend the money that we were spending on war - except in OUR economy.

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
4. I have come to the understanding
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:07 PM
Apr 2014

over a long period of time that no one has been more wrong more often about Democratic politics than Bob Schrum. (He's essentially the Democrats' version of William Kristol.) Establishing that premise, then... this piece is not wrong.

Hell, it may even be good advice.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
10. You mean like his convention speech gave Obama the 2012 election?
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 05:19 PM
Apr 2014

like that kind of save?


He got 5,000,001 votes all by himself. whatta guy. The Obamas should be eternally grateful.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Send In Bill Clinton to S...