2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Praises Obama’s Budget For Not Cutting Social Security
President Obamas budget provides major investments on rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, expanding community health centers and improving the lives and educational opportunities of our children. It includes smart investments in pre-school education and job training. It calls for expanded tax credits for 13.5 million low-income workers. At a time when the wealthiest Americans are doing phenomenally well, it asks some of the richest people in the country to start paying their fair share of taxes. At a time when the country is still struggling to recover from a terrible recession, the presidents initiatives would benefit Vermonters and all Americans by improving the economy and creating of millions of decent-paying jobs.
As the founder of the Defending Social Security Caucus, I am especially proud that the president did not renew his proposal to cut Social Security benefits. With the middle class struggling and more people living in poverty than ever before, we cannot afford to make life even more difficult for seniors and some of the most vulnerable people in America.
As a member of the Senate Budget Committee, I look forward to working with my colleagues in the Senate to build on the many positive proposals in the presidents budget and address those areas where the presidents proposals fall short.
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/03/04/bernie-sanders-praises-obamas-budget-cutting-social-security.html
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)You please many...Especially here...
merrily
(45,251 posts)I'm also glad he is where he is, too, though. As long as we keep hearing his voice, even, I'm good.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Why on earth was Bernie worried? Why is he thanking Obama for not cutting it? .
Supposedly, it's ludicrous Obama never had any intention of touching Social Security. Or other programs he refers to as "entitlements" to begin with. The interview he gave WAPO before he took office, the Cat Food Commission, floating chained CPI, the Grand Bargain Commission, putting Social Security and Medicare on the table before Boehner and Cantor asked were all brilliant chess moves.
It's not that something stopped him, be it the shift in national conversation that followed Occupy, or the desire of his fellow Democratic officeholders to ensure that the 2014 mid term is not worse than the 2012 midterm, or anything else. Iit's that he never intended to do it in the first place.
Cutting fuel subsidies to the poor in the very first budget the WH sent to Congress and cuts to food stamps are just feints, to throw Republicans off the track (IIRC, chess afficionados call the "emptying out food banks combo gambit" .
Gee, even Bernie seems to have fallen for the wild, evil imagination of the left of the left. You'd think Bernie, of all people, would know better, wouldn'tcha?
I, for one, am utterly disappointed in Bernie.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)sent Congress? What is your theory on that? Because that was the point of my post, obviously.
As far as using entitlements to describe things like OASDI, food stamps, Medicaid and fuel subsidies, until Obama, only Republicans referred to them as entitlements.
Lots of words in the dictionary refer to a female human, too. Some have been given a toxic or disrespectful connotation by the way that they have been used, practically spit out of the mouth. That's what Republicans did to "entitlements." Democratic politicians did not use it.
But, I have a feeling you knew that.
Anything to say on the actual point of my post?
dionysus
(26,467 posts)you can't change the meaning of a word in the dictionary just because repukes use it derisively.
merrily
(45,251 posts)No one is suggesting that anyone change the dictionary. Plenty of words in the dictionary that people do not use because someone or some circumstances made them toxic. And, as previously posted, entitlements was not a word Democratic politicians used publicly, for good reason. You haven't denied that, yet you repeat the irrelevant dictionary meaning issue.
Seems as though we've beaten this to death quite quickly and are both repeating ourselves. I don't find a need to post in circles, do you?