Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 09:57 AM Aug 2014

Liberal, not Conservative policies turned CA's $42 BILLION dollar deficit into $850 million surplus

And it only took five (5) simple steps and less than four (4) years to do it, requiring zero Republican input. Every State can emulate these steps and Democrats should campaign on them as a reason why Americans should vote straight Democratic Party come November 4th.

The five steps are:

1: Independent Redistricting, that made districts look more like the electorate (unlike Ohio, for example);

2: Reinstating Majority Rule on the Budget, thanks to Prop 25, we no longer needed a 2/3rd majority in order to pass a budget, eliminating the Republicans' obstructionism. A simple majority was all that was needed, and if no budget passes, lawmakers' salaries would be held up until one was;

3: Online Voter Registration, resulted in 800,000 more people registering to vote. Online voter registration helps poorer and incapacitated voters to register;

4: Asked Voters to Raise Taxes, Gov. Brown couldn't get Republicans to pass a tax hike on those making $250K +, so he went straight to the voters for an increase on State income tax. But Progressives curtailed Mr. Austerity's plan, pushing for an increase on those who make $500k + while cutting the increase in sales tax (which everyone pays) that the Governor had planned by a quarter percent ;

5: Massive Turnout Effort, which resulted in 72% turnout during the 2012 presidential elections - the largest turnout in CA history.


Although the State of California still has it problems, California (and one other State, I forget which one) had begun its painful comeback when California voters didn't fall for the Koch-funded Republican "Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!" scam in 2010.

Instead of electing more Republicans, we added more Democrats to our legislature. We dismissed corporate-backed Republican Meg Whitman, preferring a much older and former-Gov of this State, Jerry Brown (although he shouldn't be credited with our current surplus - not by a long shot!) and Liberals and Progressives in our State began wielding their new-found power, guiding our State to fiscal solvency in the least painful way for lower incomes and the poor, and doing it all in less than four years after the 2010 midterm elections.

The result?

Liberal policies and actions closed our whopping $42 billion dollar deficit (left to us, courtesy of Aaahnold Schwarzenegger and a recalcitrant Republican Party in our legislature) and gave us our $850 million surplus since January 2014.

Liberal policies are what work. California has proven it. Conservative policies continue to fail the American people and this country.

So it surprises me to read that California's success story isn't more widely known.

Every progressive talking-head should be crowing about this astounding success in California, and use it as an example why the American people should vote Democratic come November 4th.

Every Democrat in every State should point to California's amazing rebound under a Democratic legislature and a Democratic governor as the reason why we should all turn our backs on Republicans and vote Democratic Party come November 4, 2014.
65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Liberal, not Conservative policies turned CA's $42 BILLION dollar deficit into $850 million surplus (Original Post) BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 OP
k&r for the truth and for good government. n/t Laelth Aug 2014 #1
Thank you, Laelth. I hope it will help invigorate people to GOTV in 2014. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #3
My pleasure. Bonus kick. n/t Laelth Aug 2014 #6
I think it is also important to point out that Brown is mostly a very **progressive** newthinking Aug 2014 #50
Reinstating Majority Rule DontTreadOnMe Aug 2014 #2
This! Bigredhunk Aug 2014 #43
And that's why that Draper jerk wants to break it. valerief Aug 2014 #4
Just as conservatives would rather tear appart the country SleeplessinSoCal Aug 2014 #16
But our "liberal media" will not cover the facts and will continue to push the .. Botany Aug 2014 #5
We have the solutions. Listen to your left. grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #7
Left. Indeed! You could also say - "listen to your heart." calimary Aug 2014 #23
Absolutely! But it can only be done when we have Democratic majorities. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #36
It sounds better than it is. JayhawkSD Aug 2014 #8
As I've clearly stated in my OP, California still has its problems. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #11
Do you think we'd be better off under the koch/GOP? This Californian says ABSOLUTELY NO! calimary Aug 2014 #24
Link to proof of fiction please SleeplessinSoCal Aug 2014 #28
CA faces 340 billion in debt. former9thward Aug 2014 #45
The point is that without D control we would still have that $340-b in debt AND MORE. stopbush Aug 2014 #48
I understand the point. former9thward Aug 2014 #57
Well, if all you want to do is rant against Republicans, rant on. JayhawkSD Sep 2014 #65
Absolutely. We also expanded access to healthcare, including access to abortion. SunSeeker Aug 2014 #9
Yep! And added a wide range of dental services under CA's Medi-Cal (ObamaCare medicaid expansion) BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #12
Districts are still a little crazy. oldandhappy Aug 2014 #10
Does this mean magical thinking about the economy tea and oranges Aug 2014 #13
So THAT'S why Alabama doesn't look like Beverly Hills. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2014 #14
Yep. And even with higher taxes and the rich paying more of their share, Beverly Hills STILL looks calimary Aug 2014 #25
They should ALSO not have the extra to bribe politicians. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2014 #31
Well, they have gorgeous Huntsville. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #38
Guess what color their servants are. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2014 #52
We must be doing something right procon Aug 2014 #15
Bbbut everyone is fleeing California... nxylas Aug 2014 #17
LOL YoungDemCA Aug 2014 #19
Absolutely! SoapBox Aug 2014 #18
Hey, look at it this way - we could have had darrell issa. calimary Aug 2014 #26
remembered that issa cried Iliyah Aug 2014 #41
K&R ReRe Aug 2014 #20
It's only a surplus based on the accounting used and expenses not funded. OnlinePoker Aug 2014 #21
You're telling me Cartoonist Aug 2014 #22
Which is why it's up to US to shout it from the rooftops. calimary Aug 2014 #27
Neither have I. That's what's so astounding to me. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #33
The Vehicle Registration fees hike was not Progressive or Regressive, it's Retroactive Tax itsrobert Aug 2014 #29
The fee wasn't raised $6,000 Cartoonist Aug 2014 #32
That mythical HUGE vehicle tax increase was used by Republicans to boot Gray Davis out. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #34
Actually only a small portion of the annual vehicle registration fee is tax deductible. itsrobert Aug 2014 #37
Not true. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #39
Yes, did you read what you just posted? itsrobert Aug 2014 #40
Yes, I did read it. Did you? BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #47
Congrats To CA!!! benld74 Aug 2014 #30
Thanks, benld74. We're not there yet, but we're on the correct path! eom BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #35
California's progressing while GOPer run states are regressing Iliyah Aug 2014 #42
Conservative, Not Liberal Policies erpowers Aug 2014 #44
I have a girlfriend in SoCal who sent me an email saying just this. raven mad Aug 2014 #46
Absolutely, raven mad. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #49
Favorite line (among *many*) in the article: pablo_marmol Aug 2014 #51
You're very welcome, pablo_marmol. BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #61
I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half. - Jay Gould EEO Aug 2014 #53
Liberal policies are good for creating wealth samsingh Aug 2014 #54
".....and shit them to the few at the top." pablo_marmol Aug 2014 #56
its the truth samsingh Aug 2014 #60
Yes, it is. Every liberal policy that's benefited this country throughout history BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #62
Thought you laid down a typo ---- pablo_marmol Sep 2014 #64
I think vote by mail should be available in all states passiveporcupine Aug 2014 #55
"... we should all turn our backs on Republicans ..." DrBulldog Aug 2014 #58
"I'm not sure I could turn my back on a thug ... who would be watching MY back? " BlueCaliDem Aug 2014 #63
Interesting. To talk to many economic developers, you'd think that PatrickforO Aug 2014 #59

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. Thank you, Laelth. I hope it will help invigorate people to GOTV in 2014.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:17 AM
Aug 2014

We need to be vigilant, and in order to move this country forward, we need to elect more Democrats who will be held accountable by Liberals and Progressives. That's the key to the success we see in California.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
50. I think it is also important to point out that Brown is mostly a very **progressive**
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:22 PM
Aug 2014

and intellectual liberal. Not nearly the same as say the dlc style of liberal.

If California would have elected a DLC style "liberal" thing would not look nearly so different than how the state was previously.

 

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)
2. Reinstating Majority Rule
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:13 AM
Aug 2014

Should be done on ALL levels of politics. It is the ONLY solution to obstructionism.

The Democratic Party needs to paint ALL Republicans as the "Obstructionist Party, that get nothing done"

"Why are we paying them to do nothing™"

"They are in the way of progress for America™"

Botany

(70,490 posts)
5. But our "liberal media" will not cover the facts and will continue to push the ..
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:38 AM
Aug 2014

.... "both sides are at fault" and other lies.

Clinton left a surplus w turned it into a deficit and crashed the economy but this
fall we will hear about "Obama fatigue" and how people will vote republican.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
23. Left. Indeed! You could also say - "listen to your heart."
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 01:09 PM
Aug 2014

BECAUSE the human heart hangs to THE LEFT. Check any basic anatomy book. We humans are physically, biologically built to be liberals. We're WIRED to be liberals. The human species is designed by nature to be LIBERAL. We deny our own most basic nature when we defy the direction our very physicality leads us.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
36. Absolutely! But it can only be done when we have Democratic majorities.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 05:08 PM
Aug 2014

Good thing California has Democratic majorities in both the Assembly and the Senate.

Now, finally, we see what can happen when the Democratic Party is in full control, and Liberals push the Party to do the right thing for everyone. California is a shining example of which political Party's policies work best for the people. Wisconsin and Michigan, under Republican reign of austerity, shows how they fail their people when they have their way.

I was trying to show the stark differences between the two Parties when they're in power.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
8. It sounds better than it is.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:50 AM
Aug 2014

For one thing, the tax increase is tempory but the spending increases which we have implemented based on those tax increases are permanent. There are several such "smoke and mirrors" manipulations behind this so-called miracle.

Yes, it's an improvement, but it has by no means solved the financial problems faced by the state, and that $850 million surplus is pure fiction. It is more than offset by several billion in debt.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
11. As I've clearly stated in my OP, California still has its problems.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:23 AM
Aug 2014

But we can't expect miracles after fourteen disastrous Republican years, which included the energy manipulation by BushCo's buddy, Kenneth Lay, and his co-conspirators in early 2001. They had sucked out CA's projected $8 billion surplus in a matter of weeks, eventually creating a whopping $38 billion dollar deficit that Governor Gray Davis was blamed for (while it was Schwarzenegger's buddy, Duhbya, and congressional Republicans who did nothing to stop energy companies from gouging California).

The goal of my post is not to anger you. It was to inspire by showing that Democrats, under guidance of Liberals and Progressives, can turn a disaster as huge as California around while Republicans will only exacerbate said disaster. My post is meant to encourage people to vote Democratic come November 4th.

But taking such a skeptical look at California, as you appear wont to do, how would this State fair under a Republican Governor and a Republican legislature guided by the Koch Bros? Do you think we'd be better off?

calimary

(81,220 posts)
24. Do you think we'd be better off under the koch/GOP? This Californian says ABSOLUTELY NO!
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 01:17 PM
Aug 2014

I'm proud of my state. We do indeed still have numerous problems. But some of them have actually been mitigated by the policies in place now. The ken lay heist was utterly CRIMINAL. And nobody did anything about it. Under republi-CON "leadership," NOTHING was done. It was allowed. It was schemed up and implemented so only a select lucky privileged few would benefit and the rest of us could go jump in the lake. DEMOCRATIC and LIBERAL leadership tends to reject that approach, because DEMOCRATIC and LIBERAL leadership tends to favor the many over that lucky privileged few (who, to my mind, don't need any government corner-cutting and under-the-table scheming to further line their already-lavishly-padded pockets). If you're rich, you don't need government so much to protect you because your wealth enables you to take care of, and look after, yourself and your own interests VERY nicely already, thank you very much. It's everybody else who needs the protection. If you're already rich, you don't need the help, because you can afford to help yourself. So seems to me that government shouldn't concern itself as much with you and your needs. If you're rich, especially the super-rich, seems to me you're plenty capable of doing that, yourself.

The GOP has that whole concept upside-down, inside-out, and bass-ackwards.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,110 posts)
28. Link to proof of fiction please
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 02:03 PM
Aug 2014

I know that Brown is utterly pragmatic. He has his head down and tons of experience. He knows that supply and demand economics works and is setting up the state for a growth spurt.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
45. CA faces 340 billion in debt.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 08:38 PM
Aug 2014
California faces $340 billion in debts, or more than $8,500 for each of its 38 million residents, the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office said Wednesday in recommending that the state set priorities for paying down its key long-term liabilities.



http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/05/07/analyst-california-faces-340-billion-in-debt/

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
48. The point is that without D control we would still have that $340-b in debt AND MORE.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:13 PM
Aug 2014

That debt was run up under Ah-nold and R obstruction in the Legislature.

We're on the right path now, because the Rs in CA have no say in how we do things now.

People need to realize that the bad decisions and regressive policies made by Republicans create long-term problems that do not evaporate the moment they are kicked out of office. They spend decades digging a deficit hole, then the press rags on the Ds for not cleaning up the mess in a week. After a few years have passed, they drag out the "how long are you going to blame bush/Ah-nold/whoever for the deficit?" meme, ignoring just how monstrous the R-created problem was and is.

They're trying to do the same thing with President Obama, as if the loss of 8.8 Million jobs and $19-TRILLION in lost household wealth during the bush-created depression was no big deal, a mere blip in the nations' economic life.

Short memories and RW agendas are not our friends.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
57. I understand the point.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:59 AM
Aug 2014

But D or R control is never the exclusive reason. Illinois is the most indebted state in the country and they are under total D control for years.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
65. Well, if all you want to do is rant against Republicans, rant on.
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 01:31 AM
Sep 2014

I have no interest in that silliness. Finding solutions cannot be done if you do not admit that there are problems. Engaging in swooning admiration about how wonderful things have become in California since the Democrats have gained control may feel good, but doing so can result in a small beginning stalling out and leaving us with the large problems, such as $340 billion in unpaid debt and what to do when the temporary tax increase expires, unsolved.

I realize this discussion board is about partisan pilitics; about praising Democrats and bashing Republicans. I have no interest in either side of that nonsense. I am conserned with how best to move our country forward. Doing that requires looking at things as they really are, and requiring my own side to do better.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
9. Absolutely. We also expanded access to healthcare, including access to abortion.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:10 AM
Aug 2014

That will, if it has not already, boost our economy and prevent untold misery.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
12. Yep! And added a wide range of dental services under CA's Medi-Cal (ObamaCare medicaid expansion)
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:31 AM
Aug 2014

called Denti-Cal since May 2014 for all adults and children who qualify for CA's medi-cal (anyone making less than $12K a year qualifies).

If California can do it, every other State can, too. Where there's a progressive will, there's a solution.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
10. Districts are still a little crazy.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:11 AM
Aug 2014

Several near me are long and skinny and side by side. Candidates wear themselves out traveling hundreds of miles. Does not look sensible to me. And I am glad for the flip from debit to credit.

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
13. Does this mean magical thinking about the economy
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:46 AM
Aug 2014

like invisible hands & trickle down doesn't work? That doing nothing other than cutting taxes for your overlords isn't enough?

Wow! No wonder the media won't touch it!

calimary

(81,220 posts)
25. Yep. And even with higher taxes and the rich paying more of their share, Beverly Hills STILL looks
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 01:24 PM
Aug 2014

like Beverly Hills. I just drove through there the other day. Saw it for myself. The restaurants are still full. There are still people shopping at Saks and Neiman's and Chanel and Jimmy Choo and Buccellati. There's still traffic and bustling activity and a lot of Mercedes Benzes and Bentleys breezing by. They're not hurting because they've been called upon to do more of their civic duty and paying a little more in taxes. If they can afford it, they should chip in. Those same streets under their fancy tires, too, still need repaving from time to time, and the water mains underneath their fancy restaurants and the boutiques they prefer to browse still need refurbishment and repair. And if they can pay a little more, then so be it. I'd rather see their money going toward the greater public good (which INCLUDES AND DIRECTLY AFFECTS THEM, TOO, btw) than toward investments and strategies and funding efforts to further tilt the playing field.

procon

(15,805 posts)
15. We must be doing something right
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:50 AM
Aug 2014

The state's improving financial position and employment growth earned an upgrade to our credit rating from Moodys, the highest rating in 13 years. Thanks to the voter-approved tax increases and a recovering economy, our revenue outlook is looking better and that will help bring down the debt.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
17. Bbbut everyone is fleeing California...
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:17 PM
Aug 2014

...and migrating to economic powerhouses like New Mexico and North Carolina. The liberal media said so.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
18. Absolutely!
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:29 PM
Aug 2014

Never...Ever...Under Puke Rule Again.

Don't let anyone forget Gov. "Worst in California History" Ah-nold.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
26. Hey, look at it this way - we could have had darrell issa.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 01:39 PM
Aug 2014

He financed most of the persecution of Gray Davis. Because he had designs on becoming governor himself. So he funded much of the recall effort. And then Ahnold slithered in under his nose and grabbed the lights and cameras and Jay Leno's attention on the "Tonight Show" that he wanted to run, and that was that. It was almost worth all the shame and misery just to watch darrell issa sob and burble and cry in front of all those cameras and microphones afterwards, about how his big chance to buy Sacramento for himself had just slipped through his fingers - stolen by the frickin' Terminator. MAN that was a sweet moment. Took a wee bit of the "ouch" out of the OUTRAGE that they perpetrated on Gray Davis (and the rest of us).



I happen to LOVE LOVE LOVE seeing the rich squander big chunks of their money on their selfishly-motivated losing efforts. The delight of contemplating how much money shel adelson pissed away on newt gingrich with no results was really something to savor. And then he lost again when the guy who beat his boy gingrich got his own super-rich entitled pampered pansy-ass handed to him by STILL-President Obama! That was One SWEET Moment! Like they said in the candy bar commercials (I think it was for Almond Joy or Mounds) - "indescribably delicious!"




ReRe

(10,597 posts)
20. K&R
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:45 PM
Aug 2014

I don't know what you're doing out there, but I hope it's catching. I particularly like the online voter registration.

OnlinePoker

(5,719 posts)
21. It's only a surplus based on the accounting used and expenses not funded.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:49 PM
Aug 2014

The biggest is the $3 Billion contribution to the state teacher's pension fund. The deficit to that fund is now $80 Billion. They also have deferred paying anything into the state retiree health care fund because of their cash based budgeting (something businesses aren't allowed to do)...another $3 Billion.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
22. You're telling me
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 12:54 PM
Aug 2014
So it surprises me to read that California's success story isn't more widely known.
-
It isn't even known here in California. The media is still conservative here, just like everywhere else. I have never seen an article giving Dems credit for the turnaround.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
27. Which is why it's up to US to shout it from the rooftops.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 01:41 PM
Aug 2014

Put it out there EVERYWHERE. Whether it's in some letter to the editor or in random conversation with the fellow shopper next to you in line at the checkout counter.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
33. Neither have I. That's what's so astounding to me.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 04:47 PM
Aug 2014

I surmise that had it - in an alternate reality - been Republicans and conservative policies (and I did mention, in an alternate reality, right?) that had helped this massive turnaround in California, we wouldn't hear the end of it.

They'd have Republicans, exclusively, on all the Sunday talk shows - oh wait.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
29. The Vehicle Registration fees hike was not Progressive or Regressive, it's Retroactive Tax
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 02:06 PM
Aug 2014

People were being tax a lot more for cars they purchase before the hike thinking the vehicle registration taxes should be steady. And than "bam!", they are hit hard. Retroactive taxes will piss a lot of voters off. What if you owned a home and taxes were $2000 a year when you bought it and all of a sudden the next year you are paying $8000 in property taxes?

The best way to tax people is on income taxes and for some items at Point of Sales .

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
32. The fee wasn't raised $6,000
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 04:01 PM
Aug 2014

When Arnold was still governor, a proposed fee of $10 was added to the vehicle tax to fund our state parks. It would have made every Californians entrance to the park free. It failed due to the repubs. Now, some parks have been closed. Those that remain open have had their entrance fees raised.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
34. That mythical HUGE vehicle tax increase was used by Republicans to boot Gray Davis out.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 05:02 PM
Aug 2014

And I recall that it was propagated by our local media almost every night using the "$1,000's of dollars" excuse. But it was a great big lie.

Governor Gray Davis called for the rate to go back to the same level that it had been since 1948. i.e., a 2% tax of vehicle value. But when then-Gov. Gray Davis tried to do that, Schwarzenegger and his marketing team - I mean, his campaign - fanned voter anger and booted Davis from office.

Sales taxes are regressive; they take a higher percentage of household income from the poor than from the rich.

A 1999 California Policy Research Center study found vehicle license fees to be almost as regressive, but at least the revenue garnered is unrestricted and they could use the money to bail the State out of its mess. Can't do that with taxes paid at the gas pump because of voter fiat, and sales taxes paid at the gas pump can only be used for transportation. Our local government also claims a share.

Here's another advantage of car taxes - they are deductible from federal income tax. Try deducting your sales tax on your 1040 form. It ain't gonna happen. Not successfully, I mean.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
37. Actually only a small portion of the annual vehicle registration fee is tax deductible.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 05:08 PM
Aug 2014

on federal income taxes. Only the vehicle license fee is tax deductible on a federal return.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
39. Not true.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 06:08 PM
Aug 2014

According to Taxslayer, an online tax preparation service:

The IRS will allow you to deduct certain state and local taxes you paid during the year on personal property (such as a car or a boat). To be deductible, the tax must be charged to you and must have been paid during the tax year.

Deductible personal property taxes are only those that are based on the value of the personal property. For example, if you pay a yearly fee for the registration of your car, you may pay part of the fee for the tag and part of the fee in ad valorem tax. In fact, part of the fee, depending on your state, may even be based on other factors such as the weight of the vehicle. Only the ad valorem tax that was paid may be deducted because it is the part of the fee that is based on the value of your vehicle.

In addition, to be deductible the tax must be charged to you on a yearly basis. Even if it is actually collected more than once a year or less than once a year, it must be charged to you annually.
http://www.taxslayer.com/support/69/What-Personal-Property-Taxes-qualifies-for-a-deduction?language=1

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
47. Yes, I did read it. Did you?
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:12 PM
Aug 2014
For example, if you pay a yearly fee for the registration of your car, you may pay part of the fee for the tag and part of the fee in ad valorem tax. In fact, part of the fee, depending on your state, may even be based on other factors such as the weight of the vehicle. Only the ad valorem tax that was paid may be deducted because it is the part of the fee that is based on the value of your vehicle.


The proposed vehicle tax increase would be an ad valorem tax.

An ad valorem tax (Latin for "according to value&quot is a tax based on the value of real estate or personal property. It is typically imposed at the time of a transaction, as in the case of a sales tax or value-added tax (VAT). However, an ad valorem tax may also be imposed on an annual basis, as in the case of a real or personal property tax,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_valorem_tax

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
44. Conservative, Not Liberal Policies
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 08:26 PM
Aug 2014

It was conservative policies, not liberal policies that turned a hundred billion dollar plus surplus and a projected $5 trillion ten year surplus into a $1.3 trillion deficit.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
46. I have a girlfriend in SoCal who sent me an email saying just this.
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 09:16 PM
Aug 2014

I'd like to copy and send this back to her with attribution of course. She is not a DU member (yet), but is strongly Blue!

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
51. Favorite line (among *many*) in the article:
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 10:44 PM
Aug 2014

And the fact that the Golden State often sets trends for the rest of the nation must terrify Republicans.

As a native born SoCalian I too wonder why this isn't more heavily discussed. Thanks for posting this, BlueCaliDem!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
61. You're very welcome, pablo_marmol.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:11 PM
Aug 2014

It frustrates me that I'm not hearing any of this in our media - even on so-called liberal shows.

EEO

(1,620 posts)
53. I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half. - Jay Gould
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:32 PM
Aug 2014

Republican class warfare policy in a nutshell. Trick the ignorant into becoming pawns of the rich.

samsingh

(17,595 posts)
54. Liberal policies are good for creating wealth
Sat Aug 30, 2014, 11:52 PM
Aug 2014

that is more broadly shared.

conservative asshole policies take the wealth created by liberal policies and shit them to the few at the top.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
56. ".....and shit them to the few at the top."
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 01:22 AM
Aug 2014

Oh damn......that sounds quite painful. But who cares, right?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
62. Yes, it is. Every liberal policy that's benefited this country throughout history
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:34 PM
Aug 2014

is suddenly absorbed by the Right, turned around and, instead of giving back to the hard working Americans and immigrants in this country, is given to the lazy do-nothing money-hoarders of the 1%.

A good example of beneficial progressive policy would be the prosperity and jobs created under President Clinton.

Because of his Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (or OBRA-93 - a bill that not a single Republican voted for in the end, as well as a few "Democrats&quot , President Clinton presided over many years of peace and prosperity and the creation of 22 million private sector jobs that brought the unemployment number to 4.2% just before G.W. Bush was installed in the White House.

And despite Republican yowling that "President Clinton signed the largest tax increase in history" (which is factually untrue) the tax increase was only for the highest incomes (as was the case under Jerry Brown in California). But the moment G.W. Bush was appointed to the White House, that hard-fought for Federal surplus and the jobs that we had fought so hard for, vanished, when Bush's tax cuts, that mostly favored the wealthiest and corporations, was signed into law. The trillions in Federal debt that we have today, and what the Republicans are wailing, is their doing and the result of their policies. But true to their shameless and lying nature, they blame Democrats and Liberals - and our media is slow to question them. That's why they're getting away with it.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
55. I think vote by mail should be available in all states
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:34 AM
Aug 2014

in 2004 Oregon's Presidential election got an 86% turnout. It is so much easier to vote by mail. No more scheduling conflicts or having to leave work early or find someone to watch the kids. More time to go over your ballot choices and choose them carefully and recheck them before marking your ballot.

I am spoiled, I admit. I've always hated going to the precincts to vote. And I've never had to stand in long lines anywhere. With my physical health now, I would not vote if I had to go in person and there were hour-long waits. Vote by mail will improve voter turn-out. Of course, republicans will fight it.

On-line voter registration is great too. I've not seen that here in Oregon, but I registered before everyone had personal computers.

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
58. "... we should all turn our backs on Republicans ..."
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:16 AM
Aug 2014

Oh my ... I'm not sure I could turn my back on a thug ... who would be watching MY back?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
63. "I'm not sure I could turn my back on a thug ... who would be watching MY back? "
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:35 PM
Aug 2014

As always, Liberals.

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
59. Interesting. To talk to many economic developers, you'd think that
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 03:32 AM
Aug 2014

Businesses are leaving California in droves and the state's about to go belly up.

So the old saying, as California goes, so goes the nation...

Let's hope that's TRUE!!!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Liberal, not Conservative...