Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI just heard Mitch McConnell say that "we have no sacred right to not announce how we vote.."
I believe we do...
The link is at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p029gwpr#programme-broadcasts
The relevant quote was around the 16:20
Mitch, it's a secret ballot. That means we do have a sacred right to not have to announce how we voted.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1339 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just heard Mitch McConnell say that "we have no sacred right to not announce how we vote.." (Original Post)
cannabis_flower
Nov 2014
OP
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)1. It's a legal right, not a sacred one ;)
Mitch was just being theologically exact.
MADem
(135,425 posts)2. People can zip it if they want. And people are also entitled to LIE about how they voted!
When Nixon resigned it was impossible to find ANYONE who voted for him. They either stayed home or voted "D!"
Aerows
(39,961 posts)3. As a matter of principle
I disagree with just about everything Mitch McConnell says because he's an asshole.
I see no reason to deviate from that stance here!
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)4. That says it all ^
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)5. Congrats on post 420 Cannabis Flower
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)7. I guess...
that was going to happen eventually
nilram
(2,886 posts)6. maybe he means it's a secular right?
No, nvm, that would make too much sense.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)8. I think its an ok question to ask a politician.
They can refuse to answer, but might have to face backlash for ducking an easy question.