Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 04:36 PM Apr 2015

What if we released all minor drug offenders?

We hold 25% of the world's prisoners even though we are only 5% of it's population.

The rest of the Americas - Central and South America - our allies according to the media - would readily vote for an end on the War on Drugs. As would most of the world.

We, the citizens of the United States, oppose our neighbors and enfore policy that imprisons more people than any country in the world. 25% of the total prison population. Shame on us!

We, the citizens of the United States, are responsible for this.

We, the citizens of the United States, need to stop the war on drugs.

---

The problem is, what presidential contender is willing to do this?

Warren? Sanders?

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Turbineguy

(37,319 posts)
1. The economy would collapse.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 04:39 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Sun Apr 19, 2015, 05:48 PM - Edit history (1)

the justice system is a vital meat grinder. Wall street loots pension funds, the justice system loots people.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
3. It is hyperbole, but there is a Prison Industrial Complex.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 04:48 PM
Apr 2015

The War on Drugs has become its own protected revenue stream, from the federal level down to communities dependent on our gulag for jobs, there are a lot of bodies that are going to block the path of any serious reform.

Runningdawg

(4,516 posts)
5. Yes, it would collapse
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 04:56 PM
Apr 2015

if those people were released into society all at once, the problems would be overwhelming. Instantly unemployment and public assistance would skyrocket. How many of those now in prison for drug offenses, many who were very young went sent, have HS diplomas or a GED? or a job skill? Education and job training would be a priority. Being realistic, not all those who would be released would be grateful, or rehabilitated. Some would continue down the path they began and crime would also rise.
On paper it sounds wonderful, in the real world, implementing such a program would be a social nightmare.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
6. Yeah. Forget the moral prespective.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 05:10 PM
Apr 2015

How about taxing corporations and the 1% like the rest of us and releasing minor drug offenders? We could afford it then. Plus a lot more.

Priorities. We need a major shift that doesn't collapse the economy but does shift our values.

It's not easy but it is the moral option.

Response to tecelote (Reply #6)

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
9. Wow, disagree
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 05:46 PM
Apr 2015

and even if you're right, that is the most cynical excuse to keep the status quo I can imagine.

It costs a lot of taxpayer money to lock people up. We could, in the short term, use this money to implement reintegration support for the former prisoners. 25k or so per person (my guess at annual incarceration costs) would buy them a lot of help, so this is not a problem.

We'd need less prisons and prison guards, ideally we would help retrain downsized prison guards.

But the freedom of the incarcerated is primary. Prison guard unions, police unions, and for-profit-prisons be damned.

A true social nightmare is what we are living now, with so many in prison. And it doesn't harm only the person locked up, it harms the entire family of that person.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
13. do you not realize that it costs taxpayers nearly 50 grand a year to lock someone up?
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 08:16 PM
Apr 2015

...and that doesn't even include the costs of prosecution, law enforcement, debt service on the prins themselves, and a zillion other costs. To say nothing of the societal cost of broken families, parentless children, probation and parole, yada yada yada!

It would be infinitely cheaper to simply pay people to stay off drugs than it is to imprison them.

If that's too radical, it also would be cheaper to MAKE jobs and diversion programs for them and keep them in society, paying taxes and taking care of families.

Runningdawg

(4,516 posts)
16. From the replies this post has received
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 11:27 PM
Apr 2015

it appears I need to clarify my position. I am NOT advocating we just leave these people to rot in jail. They SHOULD be released, however, if you note the first sentence in my OP "if those people were released into society all at once, the problems would be overwhelming. Instantly unemployment and public assistance would skyrocket." I stand by that statement. Education and job skill training should begin immediately and they should be reintegrated into society as soon as they are ready.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
17. Dunno about the public assistance argument.
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 01:27 AM
Apr 2015

Taxpayers spend $30,000-$60,000 per year (depending on the state) to house a prisoner. How does that compare with what the government provides to the average American currently receiving public assistance?

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
10. I was going to say the same thing but you beat me to it.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 06:45 PM
Apr 2015

The prison system is an industry now, and industry in our kind of capitalist system can only grow, never shrink.
And that is why the war on drugs will be an endless war.

procon

(15,805 posts)
7. Maybe the only way to sell the idea is money?
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 05:30 PM
Apr 2015

What costs more, drug diversion, treatment programs and home detention that allows offenders to continue school and work to support their families, or hard time in prisons that also moves the family into the welfare system and makes it almost impossible for that ex felon to ever find a good job again and starts the revolving door of recidivism.

We can't continue to act like its still the 50s. It will take major science based reforms in the judicial and prison system to cut costs and improve the lives of those affected by substance abuse. It all translates into tax dollars; but I tend to think even that is trumped by short sighted, self-serving political ideology.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
8. Money seems to trump logic in America but money and logic - that's powerful.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 05:35 PM
Apr 2015

"What costs more, drug diversion, treatment programs and home detention that allows offenders to continue school and work to support their families, or hard time in prisons that also moves the family into the welfare system and makes it almost impossible for that ex felon to ever find a good job again and starts the revolving door of recidivism."

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
11. We better do that now
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 07:12 PM
Apr 2015

Or the Corrections Corporation of America will sue us all before the ISDS and a panel of corporate Shysters under the TPP.

msongs

(67,395 posts)
12. one could always have a national jobs program for these folks, fixing infrastructure. nah dems &
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 07:50 PM
Apr 2015

repubs would never go for such a thing

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
15. with the prison system so profitable and add profits from undocumented hunted down, doubt anyone
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:02 PM
Apr 2015

will stop.

Even if people are out of prison, the fines and fees revenue they have to pay to local courts and communities keep their entire family oppressed.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
18. We'd have ex-prisoners and laid-off prison employees looking for work...or social safety network.
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 09:52 PM
Apr 2015

But it must start somewhere...now. And also remember, they are disproportionally non-whites.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What if we released all m...