ROMNEY SCOTUS appointments--vs HRC---this might change your mind about not supporting Hillary

[Always Randy]

THAT WAS THEN ---------------- May 1, 2012 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN POLITICS--Romney's foreign policy spokesperson had to step down because of criticism from his own party "my ability to speak clearly and forcefully on the issues has been greatly diminished by the hyper-partisan discussion of personal issues that sometimes comes from a presidential campaign"". There are some that say Romney would have fared a lot better if he had kept this expert on his staff. Grenell really knew his stuff but the social conservatives forced him off the campaign.

I can certainly imagine that Romney would have made some different calls on foreign policy if he kept Grenell aboard. And i can just imagine who Romney would pick for SCOTUS
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/openly-gay-romney-aide-re…/


THIS IS NOW--------I guess for HRC it is about getting the job done---his orientation is none of her business or anyone else's----------I guess she will have no trouble finding the right SCOTUS appointees

http://www.addictinginfo.org/…/hillary-clintons-new-campai…

[CTyankee]

1. Exactly! This is my thesis entirely...