2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"I知 not sure the Obama campaign could have scripted this more perfectly"
Posted with permission.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/what_weve_learned_from_romneys034953.php
What weve learned from Romneys returns
By Steve Benen
Mitt Romneys campaign, as promised, released the former governors 2010 tax returns, as well as an estimate for his 2011 returns, and were starting to get a sense of why the Republican candidate wasnt eager to share these details.
None came from wages, the primary source of income for most Americans. Instead, Romney and his wife, Ann, collected millions in capital gains from a profusion of investments, as well as stock dividends and interest payments.
By any fair estimate, over $42 million in income over two years isnt bad for a guy who jokes about being unemployed. Indeed, Romney would be in the top 1% based solely on the income he makes in one week.
Romney said last week that his rate was closer to 15%, but as it turns out, despite his vast wealth, he actually only paid a 13.9% rate last year lower than his political rivals who arent nearly as wealthy, and lower than most middle-class American workers.
And what about those overseas investments?
A Reuters report added that Romneys Swiss bank account was closed in 2010 after an investment adviser decided it could be politically embarrassing to Romney.
I suspect those with far more expertise in this area will subject these materials to considerable scrutiny, but at first blush, the disclosure appears to raise at least as many questions as it answers.
Why did Romney set up $100 million trust funds for his sons without paying any gift taxes? Were his accounts in the Caymans and in Switzerland created to avoid paying taxes? Was the closing of the Swiss account related to this IRS investigation? And given all of the questions surrounding Romneys Bain-era work, why does the Republican candidate continue to insist he wont disclose returns from previous years?
Whats more, following up on a point from last week, even if Romney argues that hes simply playing by the rules taking advantage of existing tax loopholes to pay lower rates than much of the middle class this doesnt explain why Romney is eager to exacerbate issues on tax fairness with his tax plan that makes the problem worse.
In a debate over tax fairness and income inequality, Romney is practically a case study for Whats Gone Wrong, but he can at least plausibly argue that this is a mess he benefits from, but didnt create. Romney, however, prefers to believe the problem doesnt exist.
Greg Sargent did a nice job capturing the larger political context:
Romney doesnt just disagree with Obama on these fundamental issues; he personally symbolizes virtually the entire 2012 Democratic message. He is the walking embodiment of everything Dems allege is wrong with our system and the ways its rigged in favor of the wealthy and against the middle class. Yet this is the standard bearer the GOP seems set to pick.
Romney and his aides believe these materials should end the discussion. Thats backwards the larger debate is just beginning.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)glowing
(12,233 posts)Its hilarious to see him tearing Romney up.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Did he profit off of the pain of others. Dig deeper
Romney ripped Newt for being a Fannie lobbyist (not historian), and he worked for them as a 'consultant' while Floridians were losing their homes at a large clip.
However, while Romeny was ripping Newt, he had a large number investments in Fannie products that were the main culprit or vehicle for the collapse.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)In fact, he embodies only half of what is wrong. Gingrich, with his corrupt deals, racism & general viciousness embodies the other half.
Johnny2X2X
(18,731 posts)Honestly, I was expecting a sanitized version to be released, this is incredible. There is simply no working person in America that can fathom this type of income and paying so little in taxes to boot. Who knows, maybe this is the sanitized version.
I think this opens up a can of worms for the Mitt and I expect the Republicans to start demanding more tax returns from the past, it's obvious they began closing embarrassing accounts in recent years because of his campaigning. No doubt his returns from 5-10 years ago would be more embarrassing than these.
kemah
(276 posts)Poster boy for the !% and proud of it.
He will resist to release more tax returns because they won't be as clean as these current ones.
klook
(12,134 posts)to represent the .001 percent.
BadgerKid
(4,541 posts)can we not ask, "Where are the jobs?"
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)take a look at OWS.. textbook example, and with the coverage of presidential campaign the MSM cant ignore it!! Gingrich may ultimatly end up being an inintended againt of change for us..
what0now0toons
(42 posts)Romney keeps showing us what he actually is, an insensitive selfish greedy monster that has, and will continue to destroy jobs in his insatiable quest for easy profits ( it's harder to build a company that will survive, than to wreck one and sell off the assets)! He would create an economy that only the 1% can survive in, while they kick people out of their homes with Romney's blessing, he did say he wanted the foreclosure process to be stepped up didn't he? Now we can ad that he hides much of his ill gotten booty in the Cayman Islands, away from the prying eyes of the IRS.
My latest cartoon about this modern day pirate is up now at my web site
www.whatnowtoons.com
Left of Center Independent Political Cartoons
ChadwickHenryWard
(862 posts)This means that did not earn a single penny of his vast income. He did literally zero work over that period of two years, and still received a truly enormous amount of money. This raises the very important question of why "unearned" income (capital gains, dividends, interest) should be taxed at a lower rate than "earned" income (wages.) The argument is that taxing capital gains at a higher rate, or even the same rate, as earned income, will discourage investment. The problem is that under this argument, we are now disincentivizing actual work. While investment is important, surely work is more important to the daily function of the economy. Governor Romney is the perfect illustration of this perverse system, as he chose to do no actual work over the last two years, and was still lavishly compensated for his idleness.
At base, this clearly shows that the loud objections in defense of the super wealthy that "they worked hard for that money!" are just lies. Warren Buffett noted in an interview last week, on the subject of Romney, that of the 400 wealthiest Americans, roughly 90 of them have never held a job in their lives. The Waltons perennially populate that list, and they of course did not work for their money - they inherited it from their father.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)When you think of it.
And the peons also have to pay higher tax rates.
Go figure.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)gopiscrap
(23,673 posts)self centered, secret underwear wearing pig!!!!
JJ
(3,196 posts)Romney made more each day than a majority (roughly 57%) of American households made in a year.
Snarkoleptic
(5,995 posts)I plan on riding this issue like a pony!
Think of the fun...
What's he hiding?
Ravens Light
(11 posts)No wonder every news story about the race I saw before newt won South Carolina was declaring Romney the winner first thing.