2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPPP Poll (D) HRC +35
PublicPolicyPolling @ppppolls 5h5 hours ago
Hillary was up 35 on our national poll last month and she's up 35 on our national poll this month- IA/NH really on their own track
https://twitter.com/ppppolls?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Cry
(65 posts)It's not the general yet. It's the primaries. National polls are currently irrelevant at this point. Wait until it gets closer to GE, then you'll see the numbers, otherwise. Oh, and it continues showing her downward trends. 3 months ago it was 60 points over Bernie. Now you're touting 35 points? Way to prop a poor candidate.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Your interlocutor's candidate has as much chance of beating HRC as Andre Berto has of beating Floyd Mayweather a week from Saturday.
frylock
(34,825 posts)October: Yeah, poor candidates have 15-point leads
Logical
(22,457 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Be 'the' candidate.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He lost Iowa by coming in BEHIND Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongas and "uncommitted."
Didn't seem to hurt him, did it?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)including her willingly or not. Nothing follows just because it happened once. Everyone in the country is too pissed off now at everyone.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They serve to get rid of candidates without money, is all they do. Half the GOP clown car will drop away after those two contests, because they'll have shot their bankrolls on those pricey ads in those two venues. The Greater Boston media market (which serves southern NH--where most of the voters are) ain't cheap.
The shit starts happening on Super Tuesday. And that's when people who look like America vote.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)If Bernie were up by 35 you would be doing hand stands.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Shame on me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)eom
morningfog
(18,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sheshe2
(83,668 posts)Wheaties this morning justin?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Ain't nobody going to turn me around.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You can't make this up.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)They should direct their ire here:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/aboutPPP/about-us.html
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cry
(65 posts)It is not a popularity contest. The way you promote it shows it exactly like that.
And p.s., popularity doesn't even vote. Rationale does.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Homogeneous NH and IA are as representative of a heterogeneous nation as Grosse Pointe is of Michigan, Sutton Place is of New York City, Palm Beach is of Florida , and Beverly Hills is of Greater Los Angeles...
As I said Bernard Sanders has as much chances of wresting the nomination from Hillary Clinton as Andre Berto has of wresting the pound for pound championship from Floyd Mayweather.
#lol@me
Cry
(65 posts)Okay. Whatever excites you. I'm just being brutally honest.
It will be a domino effect even Clinton cannot stop.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Your candidate has as much chance of wresting the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton as the Philadelphia Seventy Sixers have of hoisting the Larry O'Brien trophy next June or Winona Ryder getting in the Octagon with Ronda Rousey and emerging victorious.
Cry
(65 posts)Just hope you don't miss the ride when it's time to ride the wave.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)eom
Cry
(65 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)It really has nothing to do with my preference and every thing to do with a sober and dispassionate review of the facts.
God bless Senator Sanders. His support is a mile deep and an inch wide.
Cry
(65 posts)It's rock solid - as in 5 miles deep, and 5 miles wide. And will only get bigger.
On the other hand, recent poll on her unfavorable was at 63%. I've asked before and no-one ever seem to want to answer that question: When was the last time a Democratic nominee with a high unfavorable won the Presidency?
It should be easy enough to look at.
jfern
(5,204 posts)than win with a liberal. It's that simple. They don't care about her high unfavorables.
Cry
(65 posts)and they fail to understand why we are not backing Clinton this time around. She's a loser, and a lot of Americans agreed in 2008, and will agree again in 2016.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Believe what you want... I will put money where my mouth is....Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee ...
jfern
(5,204 posts)That RCP average is skewed by some junk ABC poll from 2 months ago
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)We are at an impasse... I will offer a way to break the impasse. Believe what you want... I will put money where my mouth is....Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee ..
jfern
(5,204 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Believe what you want... I will put money where my mouth is....Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee ..
Cry
(65 posts)Methinks you're quite behind... (about a month, by the looks of you using the Suffolk University poll)
(clickable graphics)
To be fair, Qunnipac shows Clinton +12 unfavorable, and Morning Consult showed a +8 unfavorable, so YMMV.
Qunnipac - 39% favorable, 51% unfavorable, with 10% undecided
Morning Consult - 44% favorable, 52% unfavorable with 4% undecided
- and let's compare with Bernie's numbers, using the same information....
Qunnipac - 32% favorable, 28% unfavorable with 40% undecided
Morning Consult - 35% favorable with 30% unfavorable with 34% undecided
Which shows +5 favorable and +4 favorables.. One notable is what % has already decided about Clinton as opposed to Sanders. He still has more upside than Clinton.
So your arguments no longer holds water regarding that favorable.. She is still unfavorable and /INCREASING/. So I ask again, when was the last Democratic nominee won the Presidency with such high unfavorable?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)As I have said, ad nauseum and ad infinitum, Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee and I am willing to put my money where my mouth is...
As to her unfavorables, she still leads all her presumptive Republican opponents in the nat'l polls and she leads her Democratic opponents by twenty five points...
Hillary is like Rasputin...She has been pilloried by the press for six straight months and she's still standing...
We are back to where we started...
Bernie Sanders has as much chance pf wresting the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton as John Goodman has of wresting the Mr. Olympia title from Phil Heath...
calimary
(81,127 posts)Double standard, much?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Let em take it out on me. At this point I couldn't care less!!!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Using the normal third-person plural like that! And IN PUBLIC!! On the Intertubes, where they'll be reading it on Alpha Centauri II someday. For the love of God, THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Just lamenting.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears to have arrested her summer slump. Clinton leads the Democratic field with 52 percent of the vote, 29 points ahead of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
http://morningconsult.com/2015/08/trump-clinton-lead-primary-matchups-bush-ties-carson-for-runner-up/
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Sanders...12%
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)standing in the polls. It isn't surprising when Bernie supporters do the same thing.
jfern
(5,204 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Gothmog
(144,945 posts)sheshe2
(83,668 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Cha
(296,881 posts)GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Bernie needs to make inroads with non-white voters. No increase tells me he needs to get busy.
FloridaBlues
(4,007 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)to start the primaries come January. THEN we can talk horse race.
Response to morningfog (Reply #16)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Bernie's a steady old pony ready to be put out to pasture. Hillary's a high-bred warmblood mare in her prime.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)With so much baggage in her saddlebags, she can hardly move.
Actually.... what are you talking about???? A mare in her prime? What?
okasha
(11,573 posts)I have no idea where you're from, but here in Texas we appreciate them.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Hillary is only a few years younger than Bernie, she's hardly a filly.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I can't help but acknowledge, she is out distancing both M O'M and Bernie ... loaded saddlebags and all.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I think she's running on name recognition, and others are catching up fast over time.... and there is a lot of time to go.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the national "name recognition" deficit argument works with HRC vis-à-vis M O'M, a candidate with a 15 year political/public presence in a relatively small East Coast state ... But it doesn't work, so much, for a candidate that has been a out-spoken 30+ year member of Congress ... there is a huge difference between being a Mayor/Governor and being a US Senator.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But she still lost the last primary.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Bernie cannot ... Or, if he does ... what does that say about his 30+ years in Congress.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)I was just thinking the sample might be more diverse than an iowa or nh poll
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)eom
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)HC could've been up by 50 or even 100 points, but instead it's just 35. Her campaign is ruined. It said so on CNN.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)"Did Barbra Streisand Whup Sonny Liston?"
http://www.secondsout.com/columns/thomas-hauser/did-barbra-streisand-whup-sonny-liston
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)where did I hear that before? ... That's right, Carly F. said it ... defending her 5% national polling numbers.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)To get more super delegates and someone would still be searching for delegates. And no, there will not be a coronation for the winners of Iowa and NH. On NH, Jean Shaheen will be introducing Hillary this weekend along with saying she is endorsing Hillary. Things may change in NH very soon.
ismnotwasm
(41,968 posts)K&R
ericson00
(2,707 posts)n/t
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Congratulations to Sanders for his strong Iowa and NH numbers and equal salutation to Clinton for the unaffected by fake scandal national numbers, to both for their clear system to to media they will not engage in the media desired juvenile discussion - and to the public for not buying into the media lies...we have a stable full of thoroughbred horses lined up against the GOP pack of nags.
frylock
(34,825 posts)she's got that national primary vote all sewn up.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)I always knew you were a perspicacious gentleman despite your best efforts to conceal it.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Seems I've seen that post recently.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Thank you in advance.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)"Sinking in the polls," etc? Hmm. Despite this onslaught of negative press, she continues to be popular among Democrats.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)A lesser candidate would have given up.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)I think that a president who stands up to the rich and powerful would put the country on a better footing. If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination, and she probably will, then I'm behind her 100%.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)eom
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)this far out, when there are still all those primaries and caucuses to get through, may not be the most accurate way to assess who will get the nomination.
in 2008 Barack Obama managed to play the system to garner more delegates than Hillary. Her people tried to yell "foul!" but he was following the same rules she had to play by.
It is state by state, caucus by primary by caucus, until one candidate racks up enough delegates to win the nomination. Every cycle people salivate over the possibility of a brokered convention for one party or the other, but that's highly unlikely to happen ever again. In addition, about halfway through the delegate selection process, people stop voting for the candidate they might most prefer, and start going for the one who looks most likely to be the eventual nominee.
Which is why Iowa and New Hampshire are so unfairly crucial. Meanwhile, the many millions who live in states that won't have primaries/caucuses until March or later, are just barely beginning to pay real attention to the candidates.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Cry
(65 posts)What 2016 has, 1992 never had. And Hillary loses both Iowa and NH, people *WILL* know by then and dump her like a hot potato.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Ron Green
(9,822 posts)We could yet fail it.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)many people think there is only one Dem nominee of consequence?
Our party sucks at 'being Democratic'
Gothmog
(144,945 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,911 posts)With all election coverage going to Trump, and with talk about Hillary dominating mattes on the Democratic side - with a side of Biden speculation - the national electorate in general still doesn't get to see much about Bernie. The fact that Bernie has risen so much in Iowa over a few months shows what exposure can do, it's not like he on the surface anyway is a natural match for heartland voters.