2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAs Sec of State, @HillaryClinton prioritized clean energy worldwide
Correct The Record @CorrectRecord 2h2 hours ago
As Sec of State, @HillaryClinton prioritized clean energy worldwide http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-smart-energy-innovation/
Hillary Clinton: Smart Energy Innovation
So to those who doubt the science of climate change and who lack faith in American innovation, just tell them, look at the record and look at whats already happening across the United States. Thanks to smart federal and state policies, academic research, private sector innovation, and the crucial work of groups like LCV, we are already advancing clean energy solutions that can begin turning this tide and can make America the clean energy superpower for the 21st century. We have the opportunity to invest in the infrastructure of the future resilient enough to withstand the effects of climate change we wont be able to avoid, including next-generation power plants to produce electricity more cleanly, smarter grids to deliver it more effectively, and greener buildings to use it more efficiently. -Hillary Clinton remarks to the League of Conservation Voters, New York, 12/1/14
............
Getting smarter energy projects off the ground in Africa. Hillary Clinton helped launch a new partnership the U.S.-Africa Clean Energy Finance Initiative to jump-start private sector investment in cleaner energy projects and sustainable development across Africa. Funding provided through the initiative sparked wind, solar and hydro-powered projects in several African nations bringing electricity to thousands of homes.
Finding common goals with China to address access to reliable, sustainable, and affordable energy. Hillary Clinton spearheaded U.S. relations with China to enhance cooperation on climate change, energy and the environment. Under bilateral agreements, the U.S. and China established frameworks for increasing access to reliable, sustainable, and affordable energy as well as connecting businesses and government to support energy and environmental goals.
In this world and the world of tomorrow, we must go forward together or not at all.
- Hillary Clinton
Cha
(297,154 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Do you support H. Clinton and the oil companies that love fracking to new and greater profits?
Or do you support the peons that are protesting around the world to stop this practice that is contaminating the drinking water for millions?
It's rhetorical. Oil company profits trump drinking water for us peons.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Clinton urged Bulgarian officials to give fracking another chance. According to Borissov, she agreed to help fly in the "best specialists on these new technologies to present the benefits to the Bulgarian people." But resistance only grew. The following month in neighboring Romania, thousands of people gathered to protest another Chevron fracking project, and Romania's parliament began weighing its own shale gas moratorium. Again Clinton intervened, dispatching her special envoy for energy in Eurasia, Richard Morningstar, to push back against the fracking bans. The State Department's lobbying effort culminated in late May 2012, when Morningstar held a series of meetings on fracking with top Bulgarian and Romanian officials. He also touted the technology in an interview on Bulgarian national radio, saying it could lead to a fivefold drop in the price of natural gas. A few weeks later, Romania's parliament voted down its proposed fracking ban and Bulgaria's eased its moratorium.
The episode sheds light on a crucial but little-known dimension of Clinton's diplomatic legacy. Under her leadership, the State Department worked closely with energy companies to spread fracking around the globepart of a broader push to fight climate change, boost global energy supply, and undercut the power of adversaries such as Russia that use their energy resources as a cudgel. But environmental groups fear that exporting fracking, which has been linked to drinking-water contamination and earthquakes at home, could wreak havoc in countries with scant environmental regulation. And according to interviews, diplomatic cables, and other documents obtained by Mother Jones, American officialssome with deep ties to industryalso helped US firms clinch potentially lucrative shale concessions overseas, raising troubling questions about whose interests the program actually serves.
...snip.....
I think parts of the world may beg to differ.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)just another word for slowly poisoning the land . Unsustainable and totally uncontrollable . ANYONE who supports fracking does not support the environment .
cali
(114,904 posts)This is nothing but propaganda. It is as far from.an independent review as is possible. Correct the Record is literally propaganda.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I'm not sure- but ya know if Hillary sez so
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)fracking is not clean energy just like there's no such thing as clean coal
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)But giant oil corporations love it,
and, I guess from the opening post in this thread,
HC was advocating for it/them.
HappyPlace
(568 posts)Correct the Record?
That's your source?
OMG, you do know, don't you, that as a source CTR is shit, right?
frylock
(34,825 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The propaganda machine is really starting to crank out some grade A horse shit.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Hillary Clintons campaign plans to work in tight conjunction with an independent rapid-response group financed by unlimited donations, another novel form of political outsourcing that has emerged as a dominant practice in the 2016 presidential race.
On Tuesday, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton rapid-response operation, announced it was splitting off from its parent American Bridge and will work in coordination with the Clinton campaign as a stand-alone super PAC. The groups move was first reported by the New York Times.
I would not call Correct the record a great source - because we know to check up on Correct the record.
We all know how to use teh Googler, and we all have pretty good memories.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)This kind of shit really makes me think the hillarians are detached from reality. Really icky stuff
azmom
(5,208 posts)You were terrible on Keystone. Even before the State Department began its review of the project, you said you were inclined to approve it. Thats been your last public word on the project, but your team performed an intellectually corrupt review of the plans, your campaign bundlers landed rich lobbying contracts, and your former advisers took jobs with Transcanada.It was and is a huge mess and Im sure you hate the whole topic because at the start you couldnt have known that it would become the iconic environmental issue of our era. Since pipelines until Keystone were routinely approved, it probably seemed like just a chance to please the Canadians. Had you known it would become a hornets nest, you would doubtless have proceeded more carefully and in fairness it wasnt until the process was underway that climate scientists raised their most forceful concerns. Still, ugh.
http://grist.org/politics/mckibben-to-clinton-here-are-7-things-you-need-to-do-to-clean-up-your-climate-act/
jfern
(5,204 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)Someone should Correct That Record.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Your post is preposterous.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Clean energy, my a**.
Fracking.
When Hillary comes to Ohio next week, something tells me she won't be trying to tell US how "clean" fracking energy is...
cali
(114,904 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Hillary supporters being thankful for her pushing dirty energy, what's next?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)supports fracking is not prioritizing clean energy.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)external links, before declaring it false. They've already decided that Hillary is evil, and no amount of facts will change that.
riversedge
(70,195 posts)That--I have accepted as a FACT.
In this world and the world of tomorrow, we must go forward together or not at all.
- Hillary Clinton
Autumn
(45,057 posts)honest omission by the Correct The Record @CorrectRecord.
http://grist.org/climate-energy/where-does-hillary-clinton-stand-on-fracking/
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
DanTex
(20,709 posts)From your first article.
But to capitalize on this boom, we have to face head-on the legitimate, pressing environmental concerns about some new extraction practices and their impacts on local water, soil, and air supplies. Methane leaks in the production and transportation of natural gas are particularly troubling. So its crucial that we put in place smart regulations and enforce them, including deciding not to drill when the risks are too high.
Autumn
(45,057 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)fracking is your 'clean energy' worldwide push?
Rivers...please.