Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:27 AM Sep 2015

It's about time for Bernie to join the Democratic party, make it official.

And before someone starts with the "Vermont doesn't have Democrats" thing, the other senator, the representative, and the governor of VT are all Dems, so I'm sure Bernie can figure out what they did.

Bernie's spent most of his career dumping on the Democratic party, repeating all the usual mantras about them being unprincipled, being the lesser of two evils, etc. This has gone on for decades -- he was doing it back in the 70s, and recently he called for Obama to be primaried. Basically, he only stopped attacking Democrats when he decided that he needed the party infrastructure in order to become president.

It would be nice for him to acknowledge that basically everything good that has happened in the US government for the past century has come from the Democratic party. And the Dems are also to thank for the fact that the bad things aren't much worse.

Being an effective national political organization requires a lot of work, fundraising, coalition building, things that you don't have to worry so much about when you are representing a small liberal state like Vermont. After the 2016 campaign is done, if he doesn't happen to become president (shocker), I'd like to see him back in the senate with a D next to his name, working within the Democratic party rather than attacking it.

124 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's about time for Bernie to join the Democratic party, make it official. (Original Post) DanTex Sep 2015 OP
Now you've gone and done it! leftofcool Sep 2015 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #2
He should be a Democrat for all purposes, not just for the purpose of becoming president. DanTex Sep 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #6
What is so hard about you understanding that your orders and wishes are not those of djean111 Sep 2015 #13
He didn't need to be a Democrat to vote for the ACA Mnpaul Sep 2015 #26
From what I can see, Bernie is a Democrat of the old order - like the Kennedys - the real Cal33 Sep 2015 #47
OK, then he should join the party and make that argument. DanTex Sep 2015 #52
His views are known. He has always voted the way a Progressive Democrat does. Studies Cal33 Sep 2015 #80
So the D is more important to you than policies? HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #65
I think he would be more of an asset in congress as a Democrat, and he could also help DanTex Sep 2015 #66
As POTUS, he appoints the DNC chairman. HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #68
If by some miracle he doesn't win the election.... DanTex Sep 2015 #69
Hey Dan! sheshe2 Sep 2015 #118
Wow. And 2 votes to hide. DanTex Sep 2015 #119
Nothing surprises me here. sheshe2 Sep 2015 #121
It's about time for me to trash this POS thread. PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #3
No thanks JackInGreen Sep 2015 #4
It's about time for you to resort to this angle again! morningfog Sep 2015 #7
SOCIALISHT!!1! GUNZ NUT! OLD WHITE GUY! WHAT WILL THE NEIGHBORS THINK??? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #14
Where is the 'Why I am a Democrat' speech? onehandle Sep 2015 #8
Coming up next-Hillary's- "Why I am a Democrat" speech- but first a word from her corporate sponsors virtualobserver Sep 2015 #18
Keep talking like that and you won't get a pink pantsuit and complementary gift basket. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #20
I already have the pantsuit covered virtualobserver Sep 2015 #25
*bmus catcalls* beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #29
Isn't that supposed to be yellow or bright orange? TheKentuckian Sep 2015 #75
now you tell me virtualobserver Sep 2015 #87
The 41% of us supporting Hillary are not corporations. upaloopa Sep 2015 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #72
I don't really see why anyone on DU would consider his party affiliation to be a worthwhile argument beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #9
a yup. nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #86
It's good enough for Skinner but not the op. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #90
most sincere.... restorefreedom Sep 2015 #92
And Bernie would follow your orders why? djean111 Sep 2015 #10
Just a suggestion, if he wants to help drive the country in the right direction. DanTex Sep 2015 #37
I am sure Bernie would be touched by your condescending concern. n/t djean111 Sep 2015 #41
I doubt he reads DU, and if he does, the first thing he would notice is how unhinged his supporters DanTex Sep 2015 #42
Unhinged = won't support Hillary no matter how many times we are scolded. djean111 Sep 2015 #46
You got loveletters from that one too? beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #49
I'm talking about the incessant Hillary bashing, the glee over the email witch hunt, the repeated DanTex Sep 2015 #54
Bwahahaha! Coming from an incessant Bernie basher, that is pretty damned funny. djean111 Sep 2015 #56
Huh? I like Bernie, I've said it many times. Maybe you responded to the wrong person. DanTex Sep 2015 #57
No. I did not. n/t djean111 Sep 2015 #58
we have HRC for that reddread Sep 2015 #117
So he should be official, like Kim Davis? Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #11
I'd love to see the OP respond to this Luminous Animal Sep 2015 #15
Never in a million years. Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #24
Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church was a registered DEM as well! m-lekktor Sep 2015 #19
This is true from what I know. Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #27
+1000000 azmom Sep 2015 #38
He'd be a great counterweight in the party to people like Kim Davis. DanTex Sep 2015 #43
You did not address the fact that your standard makes Official Kim an approved DanTex Democrat Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #77
I don't have a "standard". Just saying that it would be better for Bernie to join the DanTex Sep 2015 #82
I basically agree. One big problem is that if he doesn't, and Democrats shun him, Hoyt Sep 2015 #12
He's not going to run Indy, and if someone in our party did, we would still not get a GOP hack Hydra Sep 2015 #113
They aren't dead. They fan pull 47% against almost anycDemocrat, 5% more against "weak" Democrats. Hoyt Sep 2015 #122
Why? Would a label signify he'd make a better president or senator? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #16
Are you not sick of posting this bullshit yet. HERVEPA Sep 2015 #17
All the OP does is post flamebait bullshit. Back on ignore where he belongs LondonReign2 Sep 2015 #33
If he's got Democratic ideals, he should join the party. Work with us. DanTex Sep 2015 #39
Skinner said something about that azurnoir Sep 2015 #123
his lack of official branding is one of his strong points. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #21
This is true in today's times... Blus4u Sep 2015 #30
Well, maybe if he was a Democrat he could actually help improve the brand. DanTex Sep 2015 #44
his lack of official branding is one of his strong points. Warren Stupidity Sep 2015 #70
Depends what his objective is. If he's trying to appeal to hipsters, sure, but in terms of making DanTex Sep 2015 #71
deliberately ignorant or obtuse post ibegurpard Sep 2015 #22
I'm not a Democrat. I don't think it's right for anyone to call Bernie a Democrat unless he says he seaglass Sep 2015 #35
He's running for President as a DEMOCRAT!!! ibegurpard Sep 2015 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Sep 2015 #106
Read the first sentence of the OP. DanTex Sep 2015 #40
the OP is idiotic ibegurpard Sep 2015 #81
Kind of strange that they have D's next to their names. Some kind of typo, I guess you're saying. DanTex Sep 2015 #83
yup deliberately obtuse it is then ibegurpard Sep 2015 #97
Not sure what you're confused about. He's not a Democrat, but he could easily become one. DanTex Sep 2015 #98
the confusion is not on my part ibegurpard Sep 2015 #104
He's listed as an independent in congress, so he's independent. If he's elected president, he'll be DanTex Sep 2015 #108
Only in this rarified DU world ... earthside Sep 2015 #23
Why? We think we like it as it is, DanTex. Independent. 7wo7rees Sep 2015 #28
It's time for the Democratic Party to join Bernie whatchamacallit Sep 2015 #32
Agreed. Garrett78 Sep 2015 #34
Indeed. whatchamacallit Sep 2015 #36
OK, but that's not going to happen if he's not a member of it. DanTex Sep 2015 #45
I meant join him in spirit whatchamacallit Sep 2015 #48
See that's the thing, the whole country isn't Vermont, so you have to build coalitions. DanTex Sep 2015 #50
From what I've seen passing for democrats these days whatchamacallit Sep 2015 #53
agreed rainbow fish Sep 2015 #79
+1!! (eom) mak3cats Sep 2015 #51
Kim Davis is a Democrat. Bernie is fine just as he is. And Independent who Autumn Sep 2015 #55
More made-up, childish foot-stomping. arcane1 Sep 2015 #59
Bernie is doing fine as is. If he is not elected, I'm happy to have him as an independent aikoaiko Sep 2015 #60
Who cares? HerbChestnut Sep 2015 #61
You should be grateful Bernie is running as a Democrat. Vinca Sep 2015 #62
I mean after he loses, he should go back to the Senate as Democrat, not an independent. DanTex Sep 2015 #63
Why? He still votes with the Democrats all the time. Vinca Sep 2015 #64
Bernie needs to do loyalty oaths Ichingcarpenter Sep 2015 #67
Is this going to sway any votes, or is it pure vacuous talking point? Jim Lane Sep 2015 #73
Neither. Not every post is an attempt to sway votes. DanTex Sep 2015 #74
Or Hillary could become a Republican nichomachus Sep 2015 #76
No es necesario RufusTFirefly Sep 2015 #78
what more will it take? restorefreedom Sep 2015 #84
I don't think it takes much for him to join the party. There's no "blood oath" or any other weird DanTex Sep 2015 #85
the fact that some think he HAS to restorefreedom Sep 2015 #88
He can do what he wants, I just think it would be best if he did. DanTex Sep 2015 #89
he would do just fine in the senate restorefreedom Sep 2015 #94
I think he would be more effective as a Democrat. DanTex Sep 2015 #96
there would be nothing stopping him restorefreedom Sep 2015 #99
Sure there is. Not part of the party, he doesn't have the same influence on Democratic DanTex Sep 2015 #101
part of his personal platform restorefreedom Sep 2015 #112
Since running for the Democratic nomination doesn't satisfy you.... virtualobserver Sep 2015 #91
Pretty simple, join the party. It's easy. DanTex Sep 2015 #93
I live in Texas. I have voted exclusively for Democrats.... virtualobserver Sep 2015 #100
I don't know the procedures, but if you have a D after your name in congressional roll calls, DanTex Sep 2015 #102
So you don't know the procedures, huh. Well I'll tell you then. virtualobserver Sep 2015 #110
Bernie could easily become a Democrat in congress if he wanted. One phone call. DanTex Sep 2015 #111
what you "think" is not relevant ibegurpard Sep 2015 #103
Yeah, but you're completely wrong (multiple times). DanTex Sep 2015 #105
finally putting you on ignore like I should have long ago ibegurpard Sep 2015 #107
OK, that's one option. The other would be accepting that, yes, it is possible to be a Democrat DanTex Sep 2015 #109
He's been a member of the Democratic congressional caucus for 24 1/2 years jfern Sep 2015 #114
Then it shouldn't be much of a stretch to officially join the party. You know, like Pat Leahy. DanTex Sep 2015 #116
Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #115
How 'bout this? aidbo Sep 2015 #120
He has always caucused with the Democrats. in_cog_ni_to Sep 2015 #124

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
1. Now you've gone and done it!
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:30 AM
Sep 2015

Bernie will only sign pledges to the Democratic Party in those States that have closed primaries.

Response to DanTex (Original post)

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
5. He should be a Democrat for all purposes, not just for the purpose of becoming president.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:32 AM
Sep 2015

In Senate roll calls, he should also show up as D-VT. He's spent his career attacking the organization that he now wants to become the de facto leader of. I'd say joining the organization is in order.

What is so hard about that concept?

Response to DanTex (Reply #5)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. What is so hard about you understanding that your orders and wishes are not those of
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:41 AM
Sep 2015

everybody else, and do not need to be obeyed? Just support Hillary - that seems like the best thing for you to do.
There really is not anything you can post that will peel support from Bernie, you know.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
26. He didn't need to be a Democrat to vote for the ACA
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:18 AM
Sep 2015

I don't see anyone complaining about that. Without his vote, the ACA would be just another failed law.

He spent his career attacking the Democratic Party? I think you have that backwards. The Democrats teamed up with the Republican Party to defeat him in Vermont. They also obstructed his attempts to make real change.

Where are all these attacks on the Democratic Party?

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
47. From what I can see, Bernie is a Democrat of the old order - like the Kennedys - the real
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:24 PM
Sep 2015

Democrats. He's no Third-Way Democrat, and he wants people to know it. If he had run
as an Independent, there's no chance of winning, and he knows it, too. Also, the Democratic
vote would have been split. Remember Ralph Nader? Bernie didn't want to do that
either. So he is running as a Democrat, and I sure hope that both he and Elizabeth will
help to push our Party more to the left, back to the way it was with the Kennedys, Truman
and Roosevelt. The way we are now, the Party is half-way Republican.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
80. His views are known. He has always voted the way a Progressive Democrat does. Studies
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:54 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:37 PM - Edit history (1)

at Princeton show that some experts in political science conclude that America
is already an oligarchy.

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746

Bernie is doing what he can to bring back democracy to our nation.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
65. So the D is more important to you than policies?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:44 PM
Sep 2015

That's pretty shallow thinking, and the reason the corporatist Third Way was able to infiltrate the party on behalf of Wall Street greed.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
66. I think he would be more of an asset in congress as a Democrat, and he could also help
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:45 PM
Sep 2015

build and influence the party.

sheshe2

(83,711 posts)
118. Hey Dan!
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:49 PM
Sep 2015

On Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

It's about time for Bernie to join the Democratic party, make it official.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251579971

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This post is noting but lies, Bernie has worked with the Democrats for all of his career, He has been a dependable vote with the Democrats throughout his career, Please hide this filth

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:45 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The post contain many inaccuracies. I recommend correcting them in the thread itself.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: So discussion is no longer allowed on DU? Any discussion other than about Bernie being a saint of the Dem party is filth? "This post is noting but lies, Bernie has worked with the Democrats for all of his career, He has been a dependable vote with the Democrats throughout his career, Please hide this filth" You need to get a thicker skin. You also need to debate the issues. BS is not now or has ever been a DEMOCRAT. Leave it!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

#2 Here.

sheshe2

(83,711 posts)
121. Nothing surprises me here.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 12:16 AM
Sep 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118724424

2 hides.
this is a thread about a black female member of DU getting a threatening letter AT HOME! Bravenak, a young woman with 2 young children, the letter see link. The hides. Read them.
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. It's about time for you to resort to this angle again!
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:35 AM
Sep 2015

It's clockwork: His supporters are ALL WHITE! He's anti-war! He's not a Democrat! Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat....

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
8. Where is the 'Why I am a Democrat' speech?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:36 AM
Sep 2015

Traditionally, a party switcher or joiner makes a speech about why they are now a Democrat?

What gives?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
31. The 41% of us supporting Hillary are not corporations.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:51 AM
Sep 2015

I have not incorporated and I have given enough to her campaign this year that I have to be listed as a donor.
By the way Sanders 20% of Dems is about 8% of the voters since Dems are about 40% of voters. 20% of 40% is 8% so that meme that Sanders is backed by the people is bogus unless 8% of voters represents the people.

Response to upaloopa (Reply #31)

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
10. And Bernie would follow your orders why?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:38 AM
Sep 2015

He is doing wonderfully as it is. I support Bernie - I don't just support a "D" that may or may not be what I consider an actual Democrat. Just think - that clerk in Kentucky is a Democrat. Anybody can put a "D" on their jersey. It is what they DO that actually counts.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
37. Just a suggestion, if he wants to help drive the country in the right direction.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:11 PM
Sep 2015

He's free to do what he wants, of course, and he'll probably go back to the senate as an independent and keep not accomplishing the things he talks about.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
42. I doubt he reads DU, and if he does, the first thing he would notice is how unhinged his supporters
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:15 PM
Sep 2015

here have become. Which might be a good thing.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
46. Unhinged = won't support Hillary no matter how many times we are scolded.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:24 PM
Sep 2015

Speaking of unhinged, some of us have had to actually block emails from a particularly rabid Hillary supporter. I don't see the frothing anger at the keyboard from Bernie supporters like I do from Hillary supporters. Different perspective, I guess!

By and large, Bernie's supporters care about the issues. Pure and simple. Evidently hard to understand, for some.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
49. You got loveletters from that one too?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:26 PM
Sep 2015

She's back on vacation so I'm sure anyone who hasn't blocked her will get more.


DanTex

(20,709 posts)
54. I'm talking about the incessant Hillary bashing, the glee over the email witch hunt, the repeated
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:29 PM
Sep 2015

and highly-recced declarations of sitting out the GE if the primary doesn't go the way that the far left wants, etc.

Bernie likes and respects Hillary, I think he'd be surprised how hate-filled some of his online fans are.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
56. Bwahahaha! Coming from an incessant Bernie basher, that is pretty damned funny.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:40 PM
Sep 2015

You pop up in any thread about Bernie, lately, to bash. It is actually starting to be entertaining. In case you thought you were having any effect on Bernie's support.

And when any criticism of Hillary is called bashing or hate or smearing, then you have a problem with reality. But that's okay, you vote for Hillary, I will vote for Bernie, and that is the only thing that counts.

I think Bernie met some nice Hillary supporters on his birthday. They booed at him. Ugh.

Also, it is like you think it is your job to approve or disapprove of posts at DU - that way lies madness. Or disappointment. One of those. But I don't think many take you seriously any more. Just eye rolls and move on.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
117. we have HRC for that
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:49 PM
Sep 2015

democracy DEMANDS a choice.
the choice ahead will be some serious fun for many.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. So he should be official, like Kim Davis?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:39 AM
Sep 2015

The new standard is Official Kim? She's a registered, declared, primary passed and duly elected as an official Democrat so you feel kinship with her that you do not feel with Bernie 'Founder of the larges Democratic Caucus in Congress' Sanders?
You and I have very different standards. Bernie being a Democratic candidate for the Democratic nomination having caucused with Democrats since 1992 means he's a Democrat to me. But to you he is not while Kim Davis is because you use the standards of Official Kim. I don't. To me, Kim Davis is not a Democrat, all that official registered and duly elected crap does not make a hawk into a handsaw.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
24. Never in a million years.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:10 AM
Sep 2015

I had hoped one of his cohort would. But Official Kim does make the point for us.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
19. Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church was a registered DEM as well!
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:54 AM
Sep 2015

I read he apparently remained one even though he claimed the party "left him".


 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. This is true from what I know.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:20 AM
Sep 2015

But Official Kim got elected by Democrats on ballots that said Official Kim-Democrat. She's very, very Official. She is everything the Bernie critics seem to long for in a candidate. She would pass their stated muster.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
43. He'd be a great counterweight in the party to people like Kim Davis.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:18 PM
Sep 2015

I think he would be an asset, and given that he wants to use the organizational structure to help him become president, I think it would be right for him to respond in kind and help build that organizational structure by actually joining.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
77. You did not address the fact that your standard makes Official Kim an approved DanTex Democrat
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:43 PM
Sep 2015

while Bernie is not. My standard says Official Kim behaves like a right winger and Bernie behaves like a progressive Democrat of exactly the sort my father would have loved.

But since you will not discuss like an honest broker, let me tell you this. Our Party, the Democratic Party says Senator Bernie Sanders is a Democratic candidate. You are undermining the Party, claiming that the Party is running someone who is not actually a Democratic candidate. That's the very opposite of Party building. You claim the entire Party is lying, attempting some bait and switch and not offering you an actual Democrat. It's bullshit. You claim to serve the Party by calling the Party fraudulent. You need to listen to yourself. You are arguing with the Democratic Party, not with Bernie Sanders. It's reckless and not in the best interest of Democrats other than those of the Kim Davis sort.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
82. I don't have a "standard". Just saying that it would be better for Bernie to join the
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:05 PM
Sep 2015

Democratic party. Why is this so confusing?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
12. I basically agree. One big problem is that if he doesn't, and Democrats shun him,
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:40 AM
Sep 2015

he might well run as an Independent (promise or not). That would guarantee a GOP Prez.

Don't think he will win the primary, but if he does, he owes it to Democrats to "convert." In any event, if he does win primary, I'll support him but fear loss of the White House and all the crud that would mean.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
113. He's not going to run Indy, and if someone in our party did, we would still not get a GOP hack
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:37 PM
Sep 2015

Unless they pulled an Arlen Specter.

The GOP is dead, which is why we are having this fight now- previously there were seen to be "serious" threats from the right, and we all had to pull behind whoever the Moneyed arm of the party sent us. That threat has now been overused, so we're seeing a real push for a non-DLC candidate.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
122. They aren't dead. They fan pull 47% against almost anycDemocrat, 5% more against "weak" Democrats.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 12:58 AM
Sep 2015

They control most states, and both chambers of Congress. I wish they were "dead," but they aren't.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
16. Why? Would a label signify he'd make a better president or senator?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:44 AM
Sep 2015

Good for him for being able to think for himself and criticize what needs to be criticized instead of following the party line.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
17. Are you not sick of posting this bullshit yet.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:48 AM
Sep 2015

Great idea hassling the guy who actually has the Democratic ideals. All you are doing is pissing people off about your candidate.
Are you not bright enough to realize that?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
123. Skinner said something about that
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:37 AM
Sep 2015
If it's any consolation, I really think this is in a gray area. I do not know the exact details of Bernie Sanders' relationship to the Vermont Democratic Party. My understanding is that he never actually ran in a Democratic primary, although he may have won the Democratic nomination a few times without running for it. Whatever the specifics, there does seem to exist a tacit agreement to not give him any serious Democratic opposition. So the question of whether Bernie Sanders is a Democrat is something of a red herring -- he isn't a Democrat but when he runs for congress he has the support of the Democratic establishment in Vermont and Washington DC. And he is running for the Democratic presidential nomination. So for all intents and purposes he is a Democrat, and I don't really see why anyone on DU would consider his party affiliation to be a worthwhile argument. Having said that, I wouldn't have voted to hide this, as it seems to be a close-enough description of reality. But that's just my opinion.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/12598502#post1
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
21. his lack of official branding is one of his strong points.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:59 AM
Sep 2015

Both brands: Team Democrat and Team Republican make most people throw up a bit, in their mouths.

Blus4u

(608 posts)
30. This is true in today's times...
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:39 AM
Sep 2015

...and it is probably why "party outsiders" are showing well in polls or turnout:
GOP - Trump, Carson (pols)
DEM - Sanders (turn out)

Peace

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
71. Depends what his objective is. If he's trying to appeal to hipsters, sure, but in terms of making
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:07 PM
Sep 2015

progress for the nation, I think he could be more effective within the party.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
22. deliberately ignorant or obtuse post
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:02 AM
Sep 2015

Being from a state which does not have partisan registration the only way he can do this is to say he's a Democrat. Which he's obviously done since he's running for President AS A DEMOCRAT.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
35. I'm not a Democrat. I don't think it's right for anyone to call Bernie a Democrat unless he says he
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:04 PM
Sep 2015

is one. I never heard that he said this. Is what you are saying true, he has called himself a Democrat?

Response to ibegurpard (Reply #95)

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
81. the OP is idiotic
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:55 PM
Sep 2015

Because NONE of them are official Demicrats if your criteria is "joining," the Democratic Party when there's no way to do so in a state. My Democratic governor is the head of the DGA. He's from Montana...we also don't have partisan registration here. Is he "not a Democrat?" no he is one because he ran as one and said he is one. This continual nonsense is stupid and anyone who takes your bait and argues with you about it over anything other than the terms I JUST EXPLAINED needs to be slapped. You'd have a point if he was from another state where registration rules are different. But you know that and if you don't I really, really hope you're not actually giving anyone professional political advice.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
98. Not sure what you're confused about. He's not a Democrat, but he could easily become one.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:20 PM
Sep 2015

He chooses not to.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
104. the confusion is not on my part
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:32 PM
Sep 2015

The deliberate and DECEPTIVE obtuseness is coming from you. When you can't register as a Democrat you can only say you are one. He's running as a Democrat so he's a Democrat.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
108. He's listed as an independent in congress, so he's independent. If he's elected president, he'll be
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:34 PM
Sep 2015

a Democratic president, but as of right now, he's still an independent senator (and since he won't win, that's what he'll stay). I don't know if you seriously believe that he couldn't switch his affiliation to Democrat in congress, or if this is just a game you're playing. But either way, you're wrong.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
23. Only in this rarified DU world ...
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:07 AM
Sep 2015

... amongst the Hillary scolds does this matter to anyone.

Ninety-nine percent of everyone else in the U.S. calls Sen. Sanders a Democrat -- because he is running for the Democratic Party nomination for president.

Message to Hillary-supporters on DU who bring this up: pathetic.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
34. Agreed.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:04 PM
Sep 2015

Poll after poll shows that a majority of Americans are closer to Sanders ideologically than members of the Democratic Party establishment. Labels and letters next to names don't actually mean anything substantive. That anyone cares about that sort of symbolism (over substance) is a testament to the insanity that is US politics.

Kim Davis is a Democrat. So is Joe Manchin. So is Chuck Schumer. And so on. I wouldn't vote for a single one of those folks. Issues/values matter more than labels. Let me re-phrase that. Issues/values matter. Labels don't.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
48. I meant join him in spirit
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:25 PM
Sep 2015

As in, kill the Third Way, stop drifting right, and start making this a country that works for a plurality.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
50. See that's the thing, the whole country isn't Vermont, so you have to build coalitions.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:26 PM
Sep 2015

Bernie would be a great asset to the Democratic coalition, and given that he wants to use those coalitions to become president, I think it would be a good thing to join.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
53. From what I've seen passing for democrats these days
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:29 PM
Sep 2015

I don't think it's a good fit for someone with the integrity of Bernie Sanders.

 

rainbow fish

(42 posts)
79. agreed
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:54 PM
Sep 2015

the Democratic Party should be begging Bernie to pull them back from the right, not the other way around.

Autumn

(45,032 posts)
55. Kim Davis is a Democrat. Bernie is fine just as he is. And Independent who
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 12:38 PM
Sep 2015

works, supports and is supported by Democrats.

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)
60. Bernie is doing fine as is. If he is not elected, I'm happy to have him as an independent
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:14 PM
Sep 2015

and holding the president accountable.
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
61. Who cares?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:20 PM
Sep 2015

Political parties are supposed to represent a coalition of people with the same ideas and principles. But what if those representatives begin to stray from the core ideas and beliefs that the party was founded on to begin with at the expense of ordinary people? At that point you have to ask yourself, what do you value more, principles or the club? And what that question really boils down to is this: Where does the power lie? If you think it's in the hands of the folks in Washington then by all means vote for the person with a 'D' next to their name. If you think it lies with the people then vote for the person who best represents your values.

Vinca

(50,255 posts)
62. You should be grateful Bernie is running as a Democrat.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:33 PM
Sep 2015

He's what Democrats used to be before they went all GOP-lite. As for "officially" becoming one, I don't see the point. In fact, I've kind of decided since I get so mad at so many faux Democrats, I'm changing my affiliation to Independent the next time I go to vote. I can't imagine ever voting for a Republican, but the Democrats don't seem to represent my left-of-center views at all.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
67. Bernie needs to do loyalty oaths
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 01:46 PM
Sep 2015

in fact all democrats should do loyalty oaths otherwise we will never know if they are loyal democrats according to the loyalty oath because some are disloyal and we know who they are............... what a bunch of fascist right wing shit.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
73. Is this going to sway any votes, or is it pure vacuous talking point?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:23 PM
Sep 2015

In a nation of more than 300 million, I suppose there's somebody somewhere who says, "I'm voting for Hillary in the primary, but if Bernie goes through some unspecified mumbo-jumbo to become a Democrat in some sense in which he's not now a Democrat, then I'll vote for him instead."

But I think there are damn few of those people. The vast majority of those raising this "issue" are people who wouldn't vote for Bernie if he got a donkey tattooed on his butt.

As for those other Vermont public officials, I can think of two things they did to qualify as "Democrats" in a state without partisan registration. First, they ran for office on the Democratic line. Bernie can't do that until his term is next up (the 2018 election).

Second, those serving in Congress caucused with the Democrats for purposes of determining which party had the majority. Bernie has always done that. I'm sure those Democrats -- some of them well to his right -- who got committee chairships were very happy not to be the ranking minority member.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
74. Neither. Not every post is an attempt to sway votes.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:27 PM
Sep 2015

Just saying, it would be good for Bernie to join the party.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
78. No es necesario
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 03:44 PM
Sep 2015

For all intents and purposes, she's already there.

Although it still maintains an impassioned but marginalized dissident wing, the Democratic Party has essentially been taken over by people who would've freely identified as Republicans when I was growing up

As for today's Republicans, now that the "moderates" have fled to the other side of the aisle, the loons that have remained are basically a 21st century version of the John Birch Society.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
84. what more will it take?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:09 PM
Sep 2015

don't you get it?? this is exactly why bernie getting so much support. loyalty pledges, loyalty oaths, identity politics, oligarchic control have much more in common with oppressive countries we have fought against in the past! this is the point! people are sick and tired of having to promise a blood oath to some party that isn't doing anything but serving the 1%. They are sick of having to pledge loyalties and make promises to serve a certain entity. This is not the United States that we all grew up learning about in school. And this is what Bernie is going to change. But the fact that this subject keeps being brought up and suggested just tells me how much people still don't get it. The revolution is coming. It's just sad that so many of you can't see why.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
85. I don't think it takes much for him to join the party. There's no "blood oath" or any other weird
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:11 PM
Sep 2015

ritual. Not sure where you got that idea. I'm sure the Dems would accept him, all he has to do is decide he wants to be part of it.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
88. the fact that some think he HAS to
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:13 PM
Sep 2015

is exactly the point. this election is going to be about ideas and plans, not parties, who we are affiliated with, or who people are politically in bed with. That is exactly what Bernie is running to change.

edit to add: and once again, if this is all you guys have to criticize Bernie about, wel, then I guess that just speaks for itself.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
89. He can do what he wants, I just think it would be best if he did.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:14 PM
Sep 2015

After the election, he'll be back in the senate, and I think that he'd be in a better position to bring about progressive change as a Democrat.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
94. he would do just fine in the senate
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:17 PM
Sep 2015

if that's where he were going. But he'll be living and working a little further down the road.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
96. I think he would be more effective as a Democrat.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:18 PM
Sep 2015

Particularly since he's using the Democratic infrastructure for his own ambitions, I think it would be appropriate for him to join the party and help build the same infrastructure for other Dems around the country.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
99. there would be nothing stopping him
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:21 PM
Sep 2015

from doing that as an I.

and lets remember that kim davis and dws are bith dems...so a d after ones name does not necessarily mean anything good

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
101. Sure there is. Not part of the party, he doesn't have the same influence on Democratic
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:24 PM
Sep 2015

party affairs. The Democratic Party is an organization. He wants to use that organization to his own ends, I think it would be appropriate for him to also join it and contribute his efforts to building it.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
112. part of his personal platform
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 05:00 PM
Sep 2015

seems to be that ideas and action are more important than party identity and establishment status quo. I think he could use his influence to great effect getting progressives elected to various offices, but they might not necessarily all be dems. And I think that's the point.

I think were going to see a generational change here in terms of party politics. I know people hate to see Bernie compared to Trump, and they are obviously not alike at all, but they both represent a change in the way people view their politicians and their politics. I think the rule of the two-party system is gonna be coming to an end in our lifetime. The two parties will still exist, but people will be more interested in ideas and action rather than what letter somebody puts after their name. Especially among the young people it seems.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
91. Since running for the Democratic nomination doesn't satisfy you....
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:16 PM
Sep 2015

and caucusing with the Democrats doesn't satisfy you.

I hereby pronounce you INSATIABLE!

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
100. I live in Texas. I have voted exclusively for Democrats....
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:23 PM
Sep 2015

in every election. If I decide to run for the House in the Democratic primary, am I a Democrat?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
102. I don't know the procedures, but if you have a D after your name in congressional roll calls,
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:28 PM
Sep 2015

then you are a Democrat. If Bernie's confused, I'm sure there's someone on his staff that can figure it out.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
110. So you don't know the procedures, huh. Well I'll tell you then.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:38 PM
Sep 2015

DanTex must not be from Texas. You do not register by Party here, it is just like Vermont.

So, If you are running in a Democratic primary, you are a Democrat.

Bernie is not the one who is confused, DanTex is......

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
111. Bernie could easily become a Democrat in congress if he wanted. One phone call.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:41 PM
Sep 2015

Pretending that he's stuck as an independent because of Vermont's registration procedures is truly dumb. People switch affiliations in congress, this wouldn't be the first time. If he wanted a D by his name, he'd have one. The Dems would welcome him, the only barrier is that he doesn't want to be one.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
105. Yeah, but you're completely wrong (multiple times).
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:32 PM
Sep 2015

It's not hard for him to become a Democrat. One way: call Obama and say "I would like to become a Democrat". Next thing you know, there's a press conference, he announces he's a proud member of the Democratic party now, and he's listed with a D instead of an I.

Or call Harry Reid, or DWS, or whoever. This isn't complicated. He wouldn't be the first person to switch affiliations during a congressional term.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
109. OK, that's one option. The other would be accepting that, yes, it is possible to be a Democrat
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:35 PM
Sep 2015

from Vermont.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
114. He's been a member of the Democratic congressional caucus for 24 1/2 years
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 10:38 PM
Sep 2015

and endorsed every Democratic nominee for President in that period. And Vermont doesn't have partisan voter registration.

Response to DanTex (Original post)

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
120. How 'bout this?
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:57 PM
Sep 2015

He converts switches to big D Democrat when he is announced as the Democratic nominee.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
124. He has always caucused with the Democrats.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 05:26 AM
Sep 2015

Would you have preferred he ran for President as an Independent? THEN, you may have had something to complain about after the Donald Trump inauguration.

He's on the correct side if every issue, unlike the other warmongering "Democratic" candidate running. He's more Democratic than some who claim they are.

Thankfully, our millennials know a sincere, honest, PEACE MONGER when they see one and are voting accordingly. That generation will save you from yourself.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's about time for Berni...