2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt's about time for Bernie to join the Democratic party, make it official.
And before someone starts with the "Vermont doesn't have Democrats" thing, the other senator, the representative, and the governor of VT are all Dems, so I'm sure Bernie can figure out what they did.
Bernie's spent most of his career dumping on the Democratic party, repeating all the usual mantras about them being unprincipled, being the lesser of two evils, etc. This has gone on for decades -- he was doing it back in the 70s, and recently he called for Obama to be primaried. Basically, he only stopped attacking Democrats when he decided that he needed the party infrastructure in order to become president.
It would be nice for him to acknowledge that basically everything good that has happened in the US government for the past century has come from the Democratic party. And the Dems are also to thank for the fact that the bad things aren't much worse.
Being an effective national political organization requires a lot of work, fundraising, coalition building, things that you don't have to worry so much about when you are representing a small liberal state like Vermont. After the 2016 campaign is done, if he doesn't happen to become president (shocker), I'd like to see him back in the senate with a D next to his name, working within the Democratic party rather than attacking it.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Bernie will only sign pledges to the Democratic Party in those States that have closed primaries.
Response to DanTex (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DanTex
(20,709 posts)In Senate roll calls, he should also show up as D-VT. He's spent his career attacking the organization that he now wants to become the de facto leader of. I'd say joining the organization is in order.
What is so hard about that concept?
Response to DanTex (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
djean111
(14,255 posts)everybody else, and do not need to be obeyed? Just support Hillary - that seems like the best thing for you to do.
There really is not anything you can post that will peel support from Bernie, you know.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)I don't see anyone complaining about that. Without his vote, the ACA would be just another failed law.
He spent his career attacking the Democratic Party? I think you have that backwards. The Democrats teamed up with the Republican Party to defeat him in Vermont. They also obstructed his attempts to make real change.
Where are all these attacks on the Democratic Party?
Cal33
(7,018 posts)Democrats. He's no Third-Way Democrat, and he wants people to know it. If he had run
as an Independent, there's no chance of winning, and he knows it, too. Also, the Democratic
vote would have been split. Remember Ralph Nader? Bernie didn't want to do that
either. So he is running as a Democrat, and I sure hope that both he and Elizabeth will
help to push our Party more to the left, back to the way it was with the Kennedys, Truman
and Roosevelt. The way we are now, the Party is half-way Republican.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 9, 2015, 04:37 PM - Edit history (1)
at Princeton show that some experts in political science conclude that America
is already an oligarchy.
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
Bernie is doing what he can to bring back democracy to our nation.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)That's pretty shallow thinking, and the reason the corporatist Third Way was able to infiltrate the party on behalf of Wall Street greed.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)build and influence the party.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)No higher influence on party direction than that.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)On Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
It's about time for Bernie to join the Democratic party, make it official.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251579971
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This post is noting but lies, Bernie has worked with the Democrats for all of his career, He has been a dependable vote with the Democrats throughout his career, Please hide this filth
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Sep 9, 2015, 11:45 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The post contain many inaccuracies. I recommend correcting them in the thread itself.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: So discussion is no longer allowed on DU? Any discussion other than about Bernie being a saint of the Dem party is filth? "This post is noting but lies, Bernie has worked with the Democrats for all of his career, He has been a dependable vote with the Democrats throughout his career, Please hide this filth" You need to get a thicker skin. You also need to debate the issues. BS is not now or has ever been a DEMOCRAT. Leave it!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
#2 Here.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)sheshe2
(83,711 posts)2 hides.
this is a thread about a black female member of DU getting a threatening letter AT HOME! Bravenak, a young woman with 2 young children, the letter see link. The hides. Read them.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)He's doing fine without meeting your rubric.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)It's clockwork: His supporters are ALL WHITE! He's anti-war! He's not a Democrat! Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat....
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)ARGLE BARGLE!
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Traditionally, a party switcher or joiner makes a speech about why they are now a Democrat?
What gives?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I have not incorporated and I have given enough to her campaign this year that I have to be listed as a donor.
By the way Sanders 20% of Dems is about 8% of the voters since Dems are about 40% of voters. 20% of 40% is 8% so that meme that Sanders is backed by the people is bogus unless 8% of voters represents the people.
Response to upaloopa (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I wonder which Bernie supporter said that...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1259&pid=8534
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But who am I to question their obviously sincere concern...
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)(i know i don't need the sarcasm thingy so i'll just do this)
djean111
(14,255 posts)He is doing wonderfully as it is. I support Bernie - I don't just support a "D" that may or may not be what I consider an actual Democrat. Just think - that clerk in Kentucky is a Democrat. Anybody can put a "D" on their jersey. It is what they DO that actually counts.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)He's free to do what he wants, of course, and he'll probably go back to the senate as an independent and keep not accomplishing the things he talks about.
djean111
(14,255 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)here have become. Which might be a good thing.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Speaking of unhinged, some of us have had to actually block emails from a particularly rabid Hillary supporter. I don't see the frothing anger at the keyboard from Bernie supporters like I do from Hillary supporters. Different perspective, I guess!
By and large, Bernie's supporters care about the issues. Pure and simple. Evidently hard to understand, for some.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She's back on vacation so I'm sure anyone who hasn't blocked her will get more.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)and highly-recced declarations of sitting out the GE if the primary doesn't go the way that the far left wants, etc.
Bernie likes and respects Hillary, I think he'd be surprised how hate-filled some of his online fans are.
djean111
(14,255 posts)You pop up in any thread about Bernie, lately, to bash. It is actually starting to be entertaining. In case you thought you were having any effect on Bernie's support.
And when any criticism of Hillary is called bashing or hate or smearing, then you have a problem with reality. But that's okay, you vote for Hillary, I will vote for Bernie, and that is the only thing that counts.
I think Bernie met some nice Hillary supporters on his birthday. They booed at him. Ugh.
Also, it is like you think it is your job to approve or disapprove of posts at DU - that way lies madness. Or disappointment. One of those. But I don't think many take you seriously any more. Just eye rolls and move on.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)democracy DEMANDS a choice.
the choice ahead will be some serious fun for many.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The new standard is Official Kim? She's a registered, declared, primary passed and duly elected as an official Democrat so you feel kinship with her that you do not feel with Bernie 'Founder of the larges Democratic Caucus in Congress' Sanders?
You and I have very different standards. Bernie being a Democratic candidate for the Democratic nomination having caucused with Democrats since 1992 means he's a Democrat to me. But to you he is not while Kim Davis is because you use the standards of Official Kim. I don't. To me, Kim Davis is not a Democrat, all that official registered and duly elected crap does not make a hawk into a handsaw.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I had hoped one of his cohort would. But Official Kim does make the point for us.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I read he apparently remained one even though he claimed the party "left him".
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)But Official Kim got elected by Democrats on ballots that said Official Kim-Democrat. She's very, very Official. She is everything the Bernie critics seem to long for in a candidate. She would pass their stated muster.
azmom
(5,208 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)I think he would be an asset, and given that he wants to use the organizational structure to help him become president, I think it would be right for him to respond in kind and help build that organizational structure by actually joining.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)while Bernie is not. My standard says Official Kim behaves like a right winger and Bernie behaves like a progressive Democrat of exactly the sort my father would have loved.
But since you will not discuss like an honest broker, let me tell you this. Our Party, the Democratic Party says Senator Bernie Sanders is a Democratic candidate. You are undermining the Party, claiming that the Party is running someone who is not actually a Democratic candidate. That's the very opposite of Party building. You claim the entire Party is lying, attempting some bait and switch and not offering you an actual Democrat. It's bullshit. You claim to serve the Party by calling the Party fraudulent. You need to listen to yourself. You are arguing with the Democratic Party, not with Bernie Sanders. It's reckless and not in the best interest of Democrats other than those of the Kim Davis sort.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Democratic party. Why is this so confusing?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)he might well run as an Independent (promise or not). That would guarantee a GOP Prez.
Don't think he will win the primary, but if he does, he owes it to Democrats to "convert." In any event, if he does win primary, I'll support him but fear loss of the White House and all the crud that would mean.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Unless they pulled an Arlen Specter.
The GOP is dead, which is why we are having this fight now- previously there were seen to be "serious" threats from the right, and we all had to pull behind whoever the Moneyed arm of the party sent us. That threat has now been overused, so we're seeing a real push for a non-DLC candidate.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)They control most states, and both chambers of Congress. I wish they were "dead," but they aren't.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Good for him for being able to think for himself and criticize what needs to be criticized instead of following the party line.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Great idea hassling the guy who actually has the Democratic ideals. All you are doing is pissing people off about your candidate.
Are you not bright enough to realize that?
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12598502#post1
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Both brands: Team Democrat and Team Republican make most people throw up a bit, in their mouths.
Blus4u
(608 posts)...and it is probably why "party outsiders" are showing well in polls or turnout:
GOP - Trump, Carson (pols)
DEM - Sanders (turn out)
Peace
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Thank you for your heartfelt concern.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)progress for the nation, I think he could be more effective within the party.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Being from a state which does not have partisan registration the only way he can do this is to say he's a Democrat. Which he's obviously done since he's running for President AS A DEMOCRAT.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)is one. I never heard that he said this. Is what you are saying true, he has called himself a Democrat?
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)How much clearer does that need to be made for you???
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #95)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Because NONE of them are official Demicrats if your criteria is "joining," the Democratic Party when there's no way to do so in a state. My Democratic governor is the head of the DGA. He's from Montana...we also don't have partisan registration here. Is he "not a Democrat?" no he is one because he ran as one and said he is one. This continual nonsense is stupid and anyone who takes your bait and argues with you about it over anything other than the terms I JUST EXPLAINED needs to be slapped. You'd have a point if he was from another state where registration rules are different. But you know that and if you don't I really, really hope you're not actually giving anyone professional political advice.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)He chooses not to.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)The deliberate and DECEPTIVE obtuseness is coming from you. When you can't register as a Democrat you can only say you are one. He's running as a Democrat so he's a Democrat.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)a Democratic president, but as of right now, he's still an independent senator (and since he won't win, that's what he'll stay). I don't know if you seriously believe that he couldn't switch his affiliation to Democrat in congress, or if this is just a game you're playing. But either way, you're wrong.
earthside
(6,960 posts)... amongst the Hillary scolds does this matter to anyone.
Ninety-nine percent of everyone else in the U.S. calls Sen. Sanders a Democrat -- because he is running for the Democratic Party nomination for president.
Message to Hillary-supporters on DU who bring this up: pathetic.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Make exactly what official?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Poll after poll shows that a majority of Americans are closer to Sanders ideologically than members of the Democratic Party establishment. Labels and letters next to names don't actually mean anything substantive. That anyone cares about that sort of symbolism (over substance) is a testament to the insanity that is US politics.
Kim Davis is a Democrat. So is Joe Manchin. So is Chuck Schumer. And so on. I wouldn't vote for a single one of those folks. Issues/values matter more than labels. Let me re-phrase that. Issues/values matter. Labels don't.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)As in, kill the Third Way, stop drifting right, and start making this a country that works for a plurality.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Bernie would be a great asset to the Democratic coalition, and given that he wants to use those coalitions to become president, I think it would be a good thing to join.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)I don't think it's a good fit for someone with the integrity of Bernie Sanders.
rainbow fish
(42 posts)the Democratic Party should be begging Bernie to pull them back from the right, not the other way around.
mak3cats
(1,573 posts)Autumn
(45,032 posts)works, supports and is supported by Democrats.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And it's only September
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)and holding the president accountable.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Political parties are supposed to represent a coalition of people with the same ideas and principles. But what if those representatives begin to stray from the core ideas and beliefs that the party was founded on to begin with at the expense of ordinary people? At that point you have to ask yourself, what do you value more, principles or the club? And what that question really boils down to is this: Where does the power lie? If you think it's in the hands of the folks in Washington then by all means vote for the person with a 'D' next to their name. If you think it lies with the people then vote for the person who best represents your values.
Vinca
(50,255 posts)He's what Democrats used to be before they went all GOP-lite. As for "officially" becoming one, I don't see the point. In fact, I've kind of decided since I get so mad at so many faux Democrats, I'm changing my affiliation to Independent the next time I go to vote. I can't imagine ever voting for a Republican, but the Democrats don't seem to represent my left-of-center views at all.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Vinca
(50,255 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)in fact all democrats should do loyalty oaths otherwise we will never know if they are loyal democrats according to the loyalty oath because some are disloyal and we know who they are............... what a bunch of fascist right wing shit.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In a nation of more than 300 million, I suppose there's somebody somewhere who says, "I'm voting for Hillary in the primary, but if Bernie goes through some unspecified mumbo-jumbo to become a Democrat in some sense in which he's not now a Democrat, then I'll vote for him instead."
But I think there are damn few of those people. The vast majority of those raising this "issue" are people who wouldn't vote for Bernie if he got a donkey tattooed on his butt.
As for those other Vermont public officials, I can think of two things they did to qualify as "Democrats" in a state without partisan registration. First, they ran for office on the Democratic line. Bernie can't do that until his term is next up (the 2018 election).
Second, those serving in Congress caucused with the Democrats for purposes of determining which party had the majority. Bernie has always done that. I'm sure those Democrats -- some of them well to his right -- who got committee chairships were very happy not to be the ranking minority member.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Just saying, it would be good for Bernie to join the party.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)And make it official
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)For all intents and purposes, she's already there.
Although it still maintains an impassioned but marginalized dissident wing, the Democratic Party has essentially been taken over by people who would've freely identified as Republicans when I was growing up
As for today's Republicans, now that the "moderates" have fled to the other side of the aisle, the loons that have remained are basically a 21st century version of the John Birch Society.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)don't you get it?? this is exactly why bernie getting so much support. loyalty pledges, loyalty oaths, identity politics, oligarchic control have much more in common with oppressive countries we have fought against in the past! this is the point! people are sick and tired of having to promise a blood oath to some party that isn't doing anything but serving the 1%. They are sick of having to pledge loyalties and make promises to serve a certain entity. This is not the United States that we all grew up learning about in school. And this is what Bernie is going to change. But the fact that this subject keeps being brought up and suggested just tells me how much people still don't get it. The revolution is coming. It's just sad that so many of you can't see why.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)ritual. Not sure where you got that idea. I'm sure the Dems would accept him, all he has to do is decide he wants to be part of it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)is exactly the point. this election is going to be about ideas and plans, not parties, who we are affiliated with, or who people are politically in bed with. That is exactly what Bernie is running to change.
edit to add: and once again, if this is all you guys have to criticize Bernie about, wel, then I guess that just speaks for itself.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)After the election, he'll be back in the senate, and I think that he'd be in a better position to bring about progressive change as a Democrat.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)if that's where he were going. But he'll be living and working a little further down the road.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Particularly since he's using the Democratic infrastructure for his own ambitions, I think it would be appropriate for him to join the party and help build the same infrastructure for other Dems around the country.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)from doing that as an I.
and lets remember that kim davis and dws are bith dems...so a d after ones name does not necessarily mean anything good
DanTex
(20,709 posts)party affairs. The Democratic Party is an organization. He wants to use that organization to his own ends, I think it would be appropriate for him to also join it and contribute his efforts to building it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)seems to be that ideas and action are more important than party identity and establishment status quo. I think he could use his influence to great effect getting progressives elected to various offices, but they might not necessarily all be dems. And I think that's the point.
I think were going to see a generational change here in terms of party politics. I know people hate to see Bernie compared to Trump, and they are obviously not alike at all, but they both represent a change in the way people view their politicians and their politics. I think the rule of the two-party system is gonna be coming to an end in our lifetime. The two parties will still exist, but people will be more interested in ideas and action rather than what letter somebody puts after their name. Especially among the young people it seems.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and caucusing with the Democrats doesn't satisfy you.
I hereby pronounce you INSATIABLE!
DanTex
(20,709 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)in every election. If I decide to run for the House in the Democratic primary, am I a Democrat?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)then you are a Democrat. If Bernie's confused, I'm sure there's someone on his staff that can figure it out.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)DanTex must not be from Texas. You do not register by Party here, it is just like Vermont.
So, If you are running in a Democratic primary, you are a Democrat.
Bernie is not the one who is confused, DanTex is......
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Pretending that he's stuck as an independent because of Vermont's registration procedures is truly dumb. People switch affiliations in congress, this wouldn't be the first time. If he wanted a D by his name, he'd have one. The Dems would welcome him, the only barrier is that he doesn't want to be one.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)It's already been explained to you multiple times
DanTex
(20,709 posts)It's not hard for him to become a Democrat. One way: call Obama and say "I would like to become a Democrat". Next thing you know, there's a press conference, he announces he's a proud member of the Democratic party now, and he's listed with a D instead of an I.
Or call Harry Reid, or DWS, or whoever. This isn't complicated. He wouldn't be the first person to switch affiliations during a congressional term.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)from Vermont.
jfern
(5,204 posts)and endorsed every Democratic nominee for President in that period. And Vermont doesn't have partisan voter registration.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Response to DanTex (Original post)
Post removed
aidbo
(2,328 posts)He converts switches to big D Democrat when he is announced as the Democratic nominee.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Would you have preferred he ran for President as an Independent? THEN, you may have had something to complain about after the Donald Trump inauguration.
He's on the correct side if every issue, unlike the other warmongering "Democratic" candidate running. He's more Democratic than some who claim they are.
Thankfully, our millennials know a sincere, honest, PEACE MONGER when they see one and are voting accordingly. That generation will save you from yourself.