Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf you naysayers had lived in the 1700s, we'd still be a British Colony.
President Bernie Sanders
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 541 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you naysayers had lived in the 1700s, we'd still be a British Colony. (Original Post)
Skwmom
Sep 2015
OP
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)1. Yep. Those guys were all Socialists, Reds, and long haired hippies.
Mika
(17,751 posts)2. Like another North American country: that awful place, Canada. lol
Last I checked the Canadian middle class is among the best-off middle class in the developed world.
Secession worked out great for 'Murica. Uh huh.
Nay
(12,051 posts)5. Beat me to it. If we'd stayed a colony, we'd be like Canada. OH, THE HORROR!!!
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)3. But then you could look forward to Prime Minister Corbyn...
...maybe.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)4. looks like the British are way ahead of us
In taking their labor party back from 3rd way snakes.