Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:56 AM Sep 2015

NBC: Super PAC spending heating up

TV Ad Spending Picks Up in 2016 Race

TV ad spending this week (Sept. 15 through Sept. 21)

Team Bush: $1.1 million

Team Walker: $580,000 in IA (all from Unintimidated Super PAC)

Team Clinton: $447,000 in IA and NH (all from campaign)

Team Christie: $391,000 in New Hampshire (all from America Leads Super PAC)

Team Graham: $247,000 in NH (all from Security is Strength)

Team Jindal: $268,000 in IA (all from Believe Again Super PAC)

Team Kasich: $173,000 in NH (all from New Day Independent Media Committee)

Team Paul: $38,000 in IA/NV/SC (all from America's Liberty Super PAC)

Team Cruz: $33,000 in IA/NH/SC/NV (all from campaign)


In other news ...

Super PACs Dominate 2016 Republican TV Ads So Far

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont has not yet aired a TV ad, although it hasn’t hurt him any, as he continues to rise in recent polls — even surpassing Clinton in some.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NBC: Super PAC spending heating up (Original Post) portlander23 Sep 2015 OP
That's just an early preseason game of "Celebrity Golden Calf." Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #1
Why do we just accept that this is how things have to be? liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #2
This is what they live for and this is why they will not promote Sanders. He hasn't purchased his Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #3
+1 liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #5
Birds of feather... Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #4

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
2. Why do we just accept that this is how things have to be?
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 01:04 AM
Sep 2015

I don't understand why more people aren't upset about billionaires buying our elections.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
3. This is what they live for and this is why they will not promote Sanders. He hasn't purchased his
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 01:33 AM
Sep 2015

place on their news network. Worse he threatens to lessen the ad buys of all candidates and pacs in all elections going forward. This will not stand!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NBC: Super PAC spending h...