2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forummonmouth4
(9,694 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)I see it on my end. Does no one else see it?
Response to Capt. Obvious (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
morningfog
(18,115 posts)gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)They should have done the shoot in whatever he wore coming in.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)so he put it on. lol.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... sartorial splendor has never been a big concern of his!
a kennedy
(29,644 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)He looks great in that picture.
safeinOhio
(32,669 posts)I'd drink a beer with
Buy a used car from
Trust to run my country
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)what a vibrant, energized (dare I say) youthful looking man. Looks like he has lost some weight ...
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)But what's it say on the inside?
Check it out here.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Honest, fair
Fritz Walter
(4,291 posts)I was pleasantly surprised as I scrolled through the article.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Well, who the #@$& else are you schmucks gonna vote?
Oops, sorry, I promised to not write that until the primaries were concluded. This can be our little secret, right?
brooklynite
(94,495 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,348 posts)Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)lolz -I also love the teeny tiny "why ambition isn't working for women" down in the corner.
Uncle Joe
(58,348 posts)would Time plant a subliminal gender seed on the same cover?
Since July the corporate media couldn't bring themselves to cover Bernie's surge, rallies or even interview him without bringing race into the equation, this is just a different tactic.
I like the pic, haven't read the Bernie article yet, nor the one about "why ambition isn't working for women" but they chose a rather macho image of Bernie and then planted a gender seed on the same cover.
As for the sarcastic "The media blackout continues" post to which you responded, I hardly think the first time that Time has put Bernie on the cover is any substantial refutation of the corporate media's long running historical blackout of him.
Hillary has pretty much lived on the cover of Time, these are only a few examples.
?quality=65&strip=color&w=400
pink-o
(4,056 posts)...then I looked to the bottom right and read the byline: "Why ambition isn't working for women". WTF??? Meaning we shouldn't be too strident and we should attract the flies with honey rather than vinegar? Now I'm pissed off! The Time Giveth and the Time taketh away.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Great pic!
GO BERNIE!
fasttense
(17,301 posts)No fancy, expensive suits, no perfect haircut, no manicured and pampered look like the Trump. This is a real middle class hero. A man we need to run our country.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Born and raised in Brooklyn, NY in a middle class family.
EXACTLY the kind of president this country needs desperately!
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I see at least a dozen posts a day on this topic, accompanied by even more dozens of concurring responses. Even as I see an equal number of posts announcing Bernie appearances on Face the Nation, Meet the Press, and assorted other 'news' shows. I also get the New York Times delivered to my door every day, in which I've read at least 3 feature pieces on him.
So I don't get it. The question for me is not why the media is ignoring Bernie, but why people are (a) claiming it is; and (b) being so whiny about it.
Getting your picture on the cover of Time (especially one in which you are smiling) is about the pinnacle of mainstream coverage. So can we cease and desist for a bit with the complaints?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)there certainly WAS a media blackout. I really don't think people have been complaining about a media blackout on Bernie within the past week or so at least.
that said, the media had to budge eventually, they couldn't ignore the biggest political phenomenon of today forever.
so as a Bernie supporter who saw the media blackout, I'll speak for the group (since everyone thinks one persons actions represents the many).
There was a media black out, it's gotten way better but there are still signs that there is an active attempt to cover him up. Trump overshadows everyone, then it's Hillary's turn, then the media just HAS to fantasize about Biden even though he's consistently said he doesn't have the heart and THEN, maybe they'll mention Bernie, and then when they do, its probably going to focus on Hillary.
All in all, its better now.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Because I realize people's mileage differs on almost everything: I beg to differ a bit. I have seen the complaints the past week. I think my post revealed that I've been perplexed by the "blackout" complaints for some time, given the number of featured television appearances on the major political outlets and (non-Hillary mentioning) major newspapers profiles that have occurred for the entire summer. In other words, I think the complaints have been pretty petty from the beginning.
And while Clinton may have received more "reporting time," this coverage has been almost always about e-mail issues and other potential "scandals," which makes it unwelcome coverage. There are few profiles, since I suppose the media thinks (and perhaps rightly) the nation already knows her. And yet the complaints I see from Clinton supporters are rarely whiny, but almost always complaints about factual inaccuracies.
I think everyone should stick to that tactic. Cries of "unfair!" feel sophomoric.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)Go Bernie Go!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)"For cryin' out loud, somebody throw a pie."
DrBulldog
(841 posts)stage left
(2,961 posts)Great Cover. Great man. It's "Time" for a Bern notice.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)He's a smart, hard working, energetic, champion for the 99%. I salute the photographer.
Salute!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)K and R
Armstead
(47,803 posts)aidbo
(2,328 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)[link:?w=584|
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bwahaha.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Roll up those sleeves America...there is a crap load of work to do!
TBF
(32,045 posts)put it up on the wall. Socialize, indeed.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)And hang it on my wall above my TV so I can look up at it from time to time.
(time-to-time not being a pun)
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Maybe in 2016 man of the year?
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)amended per Uncle Joe's request. He was apparently offended by the word biaches, and apparently didn't know that I am a female. :woodamnwho:
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Sleeves rolled up, ready to get down to it.
tblue37
(65,312 posts)to the ridiculous shots Time took of Paul Ryan, which were apparently intended to show how strong and athletic Ryan is:
?6
gateley
(62,683 posts)that Obama's problem (paraphrasing) was basically that after the election he said "thanks, I'll take it from here."
I think that's a valid observation (although you wouldn't have been able to convince me of that back then).
Looking forward to his interview with Rachel tonight!!!!
punguin54
(47 posts)I am all in for this guy!
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I might have to go buy this magazine.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
Uncle Joe
(58,348 posts)Bernie is getting some overall positive name recognition but on another level I recognize dog whistle propaganda when I see it.
The word that "Socialize" replaces in the general American lexicon in this instance is "eat" as in "Eat this" a pejorative phrase or insult usually referring to male genitalia, sometimes in jest and sometimes not, combine that with a macho pic of Bernie and the lower right title to an article on page 52 titled "Why ambition isn't working for women."
Many more people will only see the cover compared to the numbers that actually read the article.
I'm thinking this may shift a tactic by the corporate media in attacking Bernie more on gender than as they've been doing since July tying every rally, positive poll number and even interviews with him to race, anything to take the subject off his message of inclusiveness and the critical issues affecting the American People.
I'm thinking the corporate media is still trying to frame or pigeonhole him, hoping it jells before his name recognition becomes too large for them to accomplish that feat.
The Time Cover straddles the line of increasing his name recognition but at the same time on a subliminal level having Bernie hurl a sexist insult to the American People, now who would benefit from creating gender division?
cali
(114,904 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,348 posts)I suppose time will tell.
Peace to you
Joe Chi Minh
(15,229 posts)mad-dog, unfettered capitalism.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)pose. And no, that isn't a criticism of Sanders since he's not involved in Time's editorial decisions.
ladyVet
(1,587 posts)I think this photo puts everything that is Bernie Sanders in one memorable, informative image that anybody can relate to. He's one of us, not one of those rich folks that talk about equality and economic resurgence but get their marching orders from the 1%.
This is the guy you can stand next to at the grocery store, or at the unemployment office, or filling sandbags when there's a flood, or handing out candy to kids at Halloween.
He's spent his life trying to make things better for everybody, and you can see it.
Feel the bern, indeed!