Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 06:53 PM Sep 2015

Sanders Tied for First Among Vermont Republicans

Sanders Tied for First Among Vermont Republicans

According to a new poll conducted by the Castleton Polling Institute, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is tied for first place in the presidential race among Vermonters who identify as Republican or leaning Republican. The poll, conducted over the past three weeks, found that Sanders, businessman Donald Trump and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson each drew 12 percent of the GOP vote.

"He's the native son, so you expect a lot of support," institute director Rich Clark, who conducted the poll, says of Sanders. "But I didn't expect it to be as high among Republicans."

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Tied for First Among Vermont Republicans (Original Post) portlander23 Sep 2015 OP
........ daleanime Sep 2015 #1
It shouldn't have been too surprising, since Bernie won last election by 71% 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #2
46% say they expect Clinton to win the Dem nomination, compared to 27% for Sanders. riversedge Sep 2015 #3
yup, accept what the m$m spoon feeds you restorefreedom Sep 2015 #5
People weren't sure Obama could get win a GE either, until he did. liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #7
Since it has been REPEATEDLY beat into their heads that Clinton will win, hardly a surprise. Skwmom Sep 2015 #9
If it's Clinton/Bush again, the apathy we will see will be beyond anything sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #19
Tied among Republicans? HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #4
I thought it was, like, against the law or something to register with a party in Vermont. OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #6
Yea forgot about that have heard that over and over on this site FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #8
There isn't a registered Democrat. jeff47 Sep 2015 #12
:facepalm: jeff47 Sep 2015 #11
:weirdfuckinghandmotion: OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #13
I linked the registration form. Try reading it before you look even worse. jeff47 Sep 2015 #14
Since you were the initial interlocutor: OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #18
And where do you do that registration in VT? jeff47 Sep 2015 #20
OK. "Registration" was ham-fisted. OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #21
The illegal claim is yours. jeff47 Sep 2015 #22
"Legally impossible for Sanders to reg as a Dem. VT has no party registration" OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #23
Legally impossible and illegal are different things. jeff47 Sep 2015 #27
"Legally impossible" vs. "Impossible" is an intentional distraction. OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #31
How is Senator Patrick Leahy a Democrat? Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #24
By him saying "I am a Democrat". jeff47 Sep 2015 #25
Why the snark? nt Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #26
Because that is my natural reaction to stupid jeff47 Sep 2015 #28
I was asking a simple question because I'm not familiar wth Vermont and party affiliation Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #29
This all stems from the "special" election laws in Vermont which "prevent" Sanders... OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #33
there is nowhere to put a party karynnj Sep 2015 #15
A Vermonter can join any party as a member, mak3cats Sep 2015 #17
If Clinton polled with those kinds of numbers among Republicans NuclearDem Sep 2015 #10
Surely DUers would be happy for Clinton like they are for Bernie. nt Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #30
He bests Hillary 65 - 14 with Dems. bunnies Sep 2015 #16
They like him because he stands up for the small farmers Marrah_G Sep 2015 #32
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. It shouldn't have been too surprising, since Bernie won last election by 71%
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 06:57 PM
Sep 2015

But this is great to hear, that they didn't or aren't supporting him ONLY because
he represents them well as Vermonters, but also believe in him to serve as POTUS
for the nation.

Now that I put it that way, ok, it is a little surprising .. and in a great way.

riversedge

(70,087 posts)
3. 46% say they expect Clinton to win the Dem nomination, compared to 27% for Sanders.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 07:18 PM
Sep 2015

umm..



....Overall, 48 percent of Vermonters say they hope to see Sanders in the White House — but they're not so sure it's gonna happen. Forty-six percent say they expect Clinton to win the Democratic nomination, compared to 27 percent who think Sanders will. Twenty-six percent expect former Florida governor Jeb Bush to win the Republican nomination, compared to 21 percent who think Trump will.

"Most people are saying it's going to be Clinton-Bush, like the pundits have told us," Clark says.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
7. People weren't sure Obama could get win a GE either, until he did.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 07:38 PM
Sep 2015

Bernie may not win, but he is waking the American people up to the injustices and corruption. Even if Bernie doesn't win, something has started that will lead to big things in the future that can't and won't be stopped.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
9. Since it has been REPEATEDLY beat into their heads that Clinton will win, hardly a surprise.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 08:15 PM
Sep 2015

The Clinton Machine and Cohorts: Repeat, Repeat, Repeat Hillary will win. A poll shows the majority think Hillary will win. WOW, what a surprise.

Are we stuck on stupid in this country?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
19. If it's Clinton/Bush again, the apathy we will see will be beyond anything
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:53 AM
Sep 2015

seen before in an election.

All those newly registered Dems for Bernie will simply stay home. On the other side, it's likely that Trump's contingency will do the same thing.

Maybe we'll finally see a 'vote of no confidence' which may be what is needed.

However, to prevent that from happening, Bernie is running so we have a chance to change this system. To get people out to vote, rather than seeing over 60% of voters deciding they are not represented.

FloridaBlues

(4,006 posts)
8. Yea forgot about that have heard that over and over on this site
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 08:09 PM
Sep 2015

I always wondered how can there be a registered dem as the second senator from Vermont or registered democrats in the congress but Bernie couldn't register because they don't have that type of politicsl registration . Hum

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
11. :facepalm:
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 11:00 PM
Sep 2015

Here's the Vermont voter registration form: https://www.sec.state.vt.us/media/33935/VTVoterApp.pdf

Show me where you put in party affiliation.

The pollsters have this magical ability to ask questions. Guess what they do? They ask "Do you consider yourself a Republican?". Guess what the pollsters consider that person when they answer "yes".

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
13. :weirdfuckinghandmotion:
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 11:12 PM
Sep 2015

Vermont does not require party registration, but they do not prohibit it.

Let this be our little secret, eh?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. I linked the registration form. Try reading it before you look even worse.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 11:16 PM
Sep 2015

There is literally no place on the form to put party affiliation. That means it is impossible to register as a member of a party.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
18. Since you were the initial interlocutor:
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:53 AM
Sep 2015

NO state in the U.S. requires voter registration by party. Did I say anything about voter registration?

SOME states require party ID for the purposes of voting in caucuses, primaries and/or participating in conventions. ALL of these states accommodate party registration and/or changes to party registration at some point prior to or at the time of an election.

Other responders can take heed.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
20. And where do you do that registration in VT?
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:01 AM
Sep 2015

And keep in mind there are Vermont residents telling you that you are wrong. Feel free to show how people who actually live in the state don't know what they are talking about.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
21. OK. "Registration" was ham-fisted.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:34 AM
Sep 2015

That should read identification. There's no way (or need) for me to "register" for the Democratic Party in Ohio, but I'm a Democrat. Nothing has prevented me from identifying as such... just like in every other state of the Union.

The key here is this laughable attempt to claim that it's somehow "illegal" for a voter (or candidate) to be associated with a party in Vermont - as alluded to just yesterday (again) by the Sanders camp itself. They use the same subterfuge that there's no way to register to vote by party, as if that's germane. It's not, nor is it unique or even unusual.

Wanna "belong" to a political party in Vermont? Here are a few options:

http://www.vtdemocrats.org/
http://vtgop.org/

BTW, Vermont's current governor Peter Shumlin (a Democratic Party "member&quot went through a rather grueling Democratic Governor's Primary. A what you say? Unpossible!

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
22. The illegal claim is yours.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:39 AM
Sep 2015

What everyone else is pointing out to you is that there is no way to actually do it.

So yes, it was quite laughable when you made the illegal claim. You should stop doing that.

What's also laughable is you are now claiming there are no political parties in Vermont, as demonstrated by this dumb-ass statement:

BTW, Vermont's current governor Peter Shumlin (a Democratic Party "member&quot went through a rather grueling Democratic Governor's Primary. A what you say? Unpossible!

You know how you enter the Democratic primary in Vermont? You say "I'd like to run as a Democrat" and the Vermont Democratic party says "Ok".

You know how you vote in the Democratic primary in Vermont? You ask for the Democratic ballot on primary day.

You are desperately shoving words into other people's mouths in order to make a really, really, really stupid argument. You should stop doing that before you look even worse.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
23. "Legally impossible for Sanders to reg as a Dem. VT has no party registration"
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:55 AM
Sep 2015

From the Sanders campaign yesterday. Read it however you prefer.

I claimed that there are "no political parties in Vermont"? Da fuq? Most of the post to which you're responding notes that there are political parties in Vermont. I even linked to two.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
27. Legally impossible and illegal are different things.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:02 PM
Sep 2015

"There's no place to check "D" on the form" = Legally Impossible.
"You will be sent to prison if you try to register as a Democrat" = Illegal.

I claimed that there are "no political parties in Vermont"? Da fuq?

Then what was your point when talking about the Democratic primary for governor in Vermont? You brought that up as a "gotcha" to show that there are political parties and primaries in Vermont.

Thus deftly refuting a claim only you made. Also known as incinerating your strawman.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
31. "Legally impossible" vs. "Impossible" is an intentional distraction.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:15 PM
Sep 2015

The rest of your post made no sense. Sorry.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
24. How is Senator Patrick Leahy a Democrat?
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 11:55 AM
Sep 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Leahy

Personal details
Born Patrick Joseph Leahy
March 31, 1940 (age 75)
Montpelier, Vermont, U.S.
Political party Democratic
Spouse(s) Marcelle Pomerleau
Children 3

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
28. Because that is my natural reaction to stupid
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:03 PM
Sep 2015

And all of the arguments about "register as a Democrat" are drenched in stupid.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
29. I was asking a simple question because I'm not familiar wth Vermont and party affiliation
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:06 PM
Sep 2015

Sorry for asking a stupid question.

Please forgive me.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
33. This all stems from the "special" election laws in Vermont which "prevent" Sanders...
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 12:20 PM
Sep 2015

from "becoming" a Democrat.

Despite the fact that they aren't unique at all, and nothing about them prevents Sanders from doing just that.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
15. there is nowhere to put a party
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 11:29 PM
Sep 2015

My husband and I registered here in VT in December 2012. Very short form.

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
17. A Vermonter can join any party as a member,
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 10:20 AM
Sep 2015

but it has nothing to do with voting registration - there is no registration by party.

https://www.sec.state.vt.us/elections/frequently-asked-questions/voter-registration.aspx

8.
Do I have to register as a Democrat, Republican, Independent or some other party in Vermont?

No. There is no party registration in Vermont.

All registered voters can vote in the primary election—but can only vote on one ballot. You will be given a ballot for each of the major parties. You mark one of the ballots and put the remaining unvoted ballots into a discard bin. Which ballot you chose to vote is private and not recorded (except during the presidential primary, where voters must publicly take one ballot or the other, and their choice is recorded on the entrance checklist).

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
10. If Clinton polled with those kinds of numbers among Republicans
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 08:19 PM
Sep 2015

Well, you know what the response would be.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Tied for First Am...