Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCommon Dreams: For Many Democrats, Six Primary Season Debates 'Is Just Not Enough'
For Many Democrats, Six Primary Season Debates 'Is Just Not Enough'While the DNC sanctioned six debates in both 2004 and 2008, candidates were allowed to participate in events hosted by media outlets or universities, without repercussion. According to FiveThirtyEight, candidates ultimately attended 15 debates in 2004 and 25 in 2008.
Led by the nonpartisan and grassroots group Allow Debate, some Democrats are denouncing this year's "exclusivity clause" as "unprecedented and undemocratic"not to mention politically un-savvy.
"I think every Democratic campaign and the DNC should have to explain why we are ceding the discussion and attention to the Republicans by refusing to the kind of robust debate schedule we've always had," Martin OMalley's campaign manager Dave Hamrick said in a statement to Politico.
Some have accused DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz of limiting the number of debates in an effort to help former Secretary of State and faltering frontrunner Hillary Clinton. "The question remains," Hamrick wrote in the statement to Politico, "if the DNC is still holding to their unprecedented exclusivity clause, are they doing it at the Clinton campaign's request?"
But as Des Moines Register columnist Kathie Obradovich wrote on Sunday, such a strategy is likely to backfire.
"I dont know what Wasserman Schultz's motives may be, but she's not doing Clinton any favors by refusing to consider more debates," Obradovich wrote. "Clintons campaign has said shes open to more debates and she's a seasoned debater. Any perception the DNC is trying to grease the skids for Clinton runs counter to her own efforts to show she intends to earn the nomination, not stage a coronation."
Indeed, said RootsAction co-founder Jeff Cohen, "It really is a shame for a party called 'Democratic' to be sending a message that it wants to shield one candidate from too much democracy."
Allow Debate's petition: http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/allowdebate
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 629 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Common Dreams: For Many Democrats, Six Primary Season Debates 'Is Just Not Enough' (Original Post)
portlander23
Sep 2015
OP
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)1. DNC Debbie doesn't give a shit what us rabble want.
She wants smooth sailing through the Primary for HRH, the elitist candidate.
840high
(17,196 posts)2. ...+1