2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMy prediction for what happens in the hours after the first Democratic Primary Debate...
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, cherokeeprogressive.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I sort of thought the same looking at DWS at the New Hamphire DNC State Convention as she ignored the "More Debates" Protesters.....
It's not Female Trashing. We do pics with Men all the Time and poke fun.
But there is a bit of cartoonish likeness to the "Medusa" that given her stance on Dem Party issues does make her (as a public Political Figure) open to some Push Back. Females should be no different than Men in Politics when it comes to pointing out differences in Policy and Tactics.
I say this as a female.
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)conversely Schultz is cynically attempting to etch the front runner's status into stone by denying or limiting the peoples' opportunity to see the Democratic Candidates when it matters the most.
Good analogy...The full Mythology Aside... that she is most identified by "turning people into Stone"..this fits for our activist Dem's view of what we've seen of her, sadly. We could do much better than DWS and that she was foisted on us makes it worse.
Quote:
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)In a late version of the Medusa myth, related by the Roman poet Ovid (Metamorphoses 4.770), Medusa was originally a ravishingly beautiful maiden, "the jealous aspiration of many suitors," but because Poseidon had raped her in Athena's temple, the enraged Athena transformed Medusa's beautiful hair to serpents and made her face so terrible to behold that the mere sight of it would turn onlookers to stone.[6] In Ovid's telling, Perseus describes Medusa's punishment by Minerva (Athena) as just and well earned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medusa
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251608603
Wasserman Schultz hypocritical about rules. 2008 said Dean's DNC rules "counterproductive"
(snip)
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Hillary camp argued for fewer than 6 debates in negotiations with DNC
Last spring, when negotiations between the DNC and the Dem campaigns over the debate schedule got underway in earnest, the Clinton camps preference was to have only four debates, one in each of the early contest states of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, according to a senior Democrat with knowledge of those conversations. ...
Here an important nuance needs to be noted. At that point, the DNC had only announced the amount of debates, and not their schedule. The dates of the debates were announced in August. It was at that point that outrage really began to build, because the dates themselves created a situation that began to be seen as problematic. (Those dates are October 13, November 14th, December 19th, January 17th, and two in February or March that are not nailed down yet.)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=611077
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)as Hillary is in the race, Schultz can't be an honest broker.
Medusa was beheaded by the hero Perseus, who thereafter used her head, which retained its ability to turn onlookers to stone, as a weapon[4] until he gave it to the goddess Athena to place on her shield. In classical antiquity the image of the head of Medusa appeared in the evil-averting device known as the Gorgoneion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medusa
Schultz needs to resign, be fired or removed as head of the DNC, she would then be free to join Hillary's campaign overtly, in effect being on HRC's political shield.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Here's to hoping it backfires.
cali
(114,904 posts)And I 've seen him debate a dozen plus times. He's quite comfortable on a debate stage
mccallen
(24 posts)When it begins the nosedive
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)that going back to her Senate runs, Hillary has been considered possibly the worst debater on the national political stage? She's just not good at all at it for the same reasons she always seems stiff and rehearsed and cold in speeches...she's really at-heart an introvert. When she's gotten off her talking points, she gets too into her own head.
Bernie is a comfortable and solid debater...anybody would have a hard time against Sanders. (Except Obama...I concede that Obama would beat Sanders easily but Obama is an exceptional debater, possibly the best in recent memory.)
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)frankly, other than as public spectacle and as venues to lay out one's agenda and positions (something Hillary seems committed to not doing anyways) I don't know that debates are all that important unless you completely blow one and stink the joint up like James Stockdale did.
...but to suggest that Hillary is going to so thoroughly defeat Sanders in the first debate that he begs to not have to debate her again is...well, a likely sign of some sort of mental defect. It's like believing that your kid's second-to-last-place Little League team is going to beat the New York Yankees. The goal for Hillary will be to not faceplant out of the race...a good showing is all she probably thinks she needs and all her supporters can realistically expect out of her.
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)AngryParakeet
(35 posts)Hillary won most of the debates in 2008, right?
Some of you are going to be shocked at how well Hillary does against Sanders, but I'm sure none will admit it.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)Bernie will own that debate stage.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)all toddle off to sleep when it is over. If they give Webb, Chafee, O'Malley the same time as the the others, boredom is guaranteed all those three are going to do is talk up ideas that the conservatives assign to Democratic some will be sappy and will be attacked before they are mentioned since those three are to me, the lefty libertarian, third way candidates, not Democratic at all are these the populists some here talk about if so populists are more libertarian than Democratic though they are not opposed to our national government.
I noticed way back that the allegedly liberal sites using the word progressive and populist to differentiate from the word they consider dirty, liberal. I was frankly shocked and stunned at all the libertarian ideas they were promoting.
I want good old fashioned U.S. style liberals, FDR, Kennedy,(he seemed likely to be liberal), Johnson of course with the Civil Rights/Voting rights and Medicare.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)martin, a fellow progressive, strikes me as someone who could be a very good debater (calling ellen, bigtree) and chafee has pretty much said he is running for pres to pound the living shit out of the iraq war and highlight those who voted for it *hillary, cough cough*. i don.t know anything about webb, but he will occupy the coveted right of center territory that hillary lives in but likes to pretend she doesnt.
i expect that after the first debate there will be some "adjustments" to the schedule wherein the rest of the debate venues suddenly all get infested with toxic mold.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,810 posts)He's going to do well in the debates - very well.
If - If he sticks to -
cool idea opponent - but I already did that.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)to see them interact
of course,dws will probably not let them interact
treestar
(82,383 posts)The debate brings O'Malley to the forefront due to its nature. Suddenly the media is all O'Malley, all the time. Starts to get more significant numbers. The media loves the new and different.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Nice try, but this kind of thinking just makes her look even worse.
jfern
(5,204 posts)what Hillary stands for.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I guess it was to much to ask.
If, as RBInMaine says, that you can never get your message out if you can't do it in 6 debates... then Hillary can never get her message out. NEVER!
But this is a Hillary supporter we are talking about. So there will be a much lower standard for Hillary than for anyone and everyone else on the planet.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Yet another example of if it were the Republicans doing this to the Democrats the Democratic party would be furious, but it is okay for the party establishment candidate to do to another candidate.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I question the intelligence of anybody who questions the intelligence and arguing skills of Secretary Clinton. Throw out all the other accomplishments, a man or woman doesn't graduate from the most selective law school in the land, Yale Law School, without being able to put together and deliver a really good argument.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When she argued cases as a young law school graduate she was so well prepared her opponents called her 'Death'.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)She never, ever tried a jury trial on her own. Ever. She is wooden, stale, and Ill at ease on her feet. She is a horrible debater, which is why DWS is doing her best to protect hill from herself.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)eom
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)I knew hillarians have thin skin, but even parchment is ten times thicker.
Prey, do tell,where am I attacking you?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The attacks keep coming. Please tell me what I did to raise your ire so I can try not to repeat it.
Thank you in advance.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)To quote my fave republicants, seriesly?
Using the word hillarian is an attack on you.
I need to wrap my head around just how inane that sounds.
Someone here needs a vacation from any political blog. And it ain't me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Please tell me what I did to raise your ire so I can address it and try to make it stop.
Thank you in advance.
Bucky
(53,997 posts)I agree she's inconsistent. Sometimes she comes off elitist and insular to her Manhattan/DC world. Sometimes she throws out a caustic comment that lands with a thud and opens her campaigns up to vicious trollery. But there's also times when she strikes just the right note, especially under pressure. Her performance before the Benghazi committee (well, one of them--I lost count) was masterful and convincing. She always comes off uber competent. She doesn't have what you'd call a winning personality. But we're not electing a Buddy-in-Chief.
Most of the criticism of Clinton comes down to politely refined sexist stereotypes. If a man displayed the same qualities, it wouldn't be a big deal. Trump's a fucking monster but I guarantee you if he'd jumped into the Democratic race, he'd be polling in the mid-20s at this point (assuming he had the marketing savvy to pander to our issues in such an alternative universe).
quickesst
(6,280 posts)...of what is going to happen in the hours after the first debate to many of Bernie's supporters.
askew
(1,464 posts)They will call O'Malley the loser because he called for more debates and didn't make Hillary run from the stage in tears. And they will ignore Sanders.
I think you hit the nail on the head.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)If they hadn't already. Most probably didn't even watch. Life will go on. Earth will still turn.