Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 08:02 PM Sep 2015

Now that we know that HRC wanted only 4 debates,

and we know that 2 out of the six are not given
a date (probably shortly before the convention),
we might as well assume that the questions will be
rigged as well.
So let's amuse ourselves to imagine some of
those, like
"Do you like children?"

"Should children get vaccinated?"

"How do you answer Mr. Trump's attack on immigrants?"

"What do you think about Climate Change deniers ?"

I am sure that you will find better ones. Have fun!

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now that we know that HRC wanted only 4 debates, (Original Post) sadoldgirl Sep 2015 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #1
Good post Catherina Sep 2015 #3
... Scootaloo Sep 2015 #2
She has officially rigged democracy jkbRN Sep 2015 #4

Response to sadoldgirl (Original post)

jkbRN

(850 posts)
4. She has officially rigged democracy
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 09:42 PM
Sep 2015

along with the republicans.

I would say that using a tactic that purposely limits the candidates ideas and policies as a means to have low-information voters. This is just as bad as suppressing the vote--it feeds off of, well, suppression to say the least. This will not only effect minorities and people of low income, but it limits information for all voters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Now that we know that HRC...