2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary down to 33% in TWO polls
Note that her actual support is still probably somewhat higher than 33%.
Bloomberg poll:
Clinton 33
Biden 25
Sanders 24
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-23/bloomberg-poll-joe-biden-now-top-presidential-choice-for-1-in-4-democrats
Reuters poll:
Clinton 33
Sanders 30
Biden 14
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/23/1424266/-Did-someone-say-bounce-NAT-Rolling-Poll-HRC-33-BERNIE-30-BFD-14
randys1
(16,286 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)saturnsring
(1,832 posts)(hmmmm I wonder what that could be) is included when he's not running . take out biden and she's over 50%
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)and that's not a given.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Biden is at 14%. She doesn't make 50% even if she got all of Biden's 14%. Which she likely wouldn't.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Personally, I don't understand how anybody could choose her now, but that's me.
I would have voted for her in a heartbeat some years ago, but not any more. I cannot overlook her record.
randys1
(16,286 posts)It is real easy for some sincere Bernie supporters to get confused.
They see Hillary as this corporate candidate and Bernie as the people's candidate, and to some extent this is true, but the confusion comes in as to what the OTHER side is doing and why.
The OTHER side is trying to destroy Hillary so they can take over ALL of the government.
then watch the fuck out...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)sorry for being a poor deluded Bernie supporter.
this stupid meme has really been circulating a lot lately...Bernie supporters are simply being used by the right wing. complete and utter nonsense...especially when it is Hillary's supporters that are being used by the right wing...she is un-electable.
840high
(17,196 posts)confused. Look in the mirror.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Not quite the Bernie Support conspiracy some were looking for
Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #30)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Response to FreakinDJ (Reply #36)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)saturnsring
(1,832 posts)biden voters
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)And the answer to that is with Biden in, the democratic primary becomes competitive in a way that is much more typical of democratic primaries 14 months from the GE
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)her lead -
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)that's what sells advertising which is -the business plan- that drives professional media.
It's quite likely that the millions H> is spending on polling has already revealed these same things. And that information is very likely already used to develop guidance for surrogates, as well as messaging with the public.
Knowing some of the 'hidden' information is important to meaningful understanding of the plays that the campaigns make.
There is really no reason why while people with recreational interest in politics shouldn't have similar information.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)My comments were about polling that included Biden, and why Biden might be included even when he's not announced.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)But more to the point, keep in mind, each and every poll posted here is done so by someone with an agenda. Take all of them with a 🚚 load of salt.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)If you look at the trend for that one Hillary was way up then way down then way up again then way down again. It doesn't make sense.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Embarrassing, I should think.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)There have been a few running averages that included lower polls, once the high outlier for late Aug was out, those lower polls have dragged a steady, albeit modest rise of 4-5% for sanders across the polls of Sep.
A 5 percent rise per month would put Sanders even or better with Clinton by the end of Dec. That's probably exactly where Sanders needs to be preparing to take advantage of a surge coming out of NH.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Assuming a linear graph, if Biden stays in then he outpaces Sanders. If Biden doesn't, then even 15 points isn't going to narrow the gap sufficiently.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)anyone doing better will be forced to mean at least one candidates goes down.
So things which are curvilinear won't be likely to maintain projections of their current rates of change.
Unless all the slopes go zero, which is very unlikely, we're getting to the sorting out phase.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)stevil
(1,537 posts)And then check the comments. Those results include ALL likely voters, not just Democrats. Apart from that it is a great rolling poll to bookmark and tweak by playing with the filters.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... since Bernie appeals more to independents that will likely in the coming year become registered Democrats to vote for Bernie in the primary.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But your point is well taken.
I don't think Bernie is within 3 points either, not yet at least.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Thanks for clarifying.
kenn3d
(486 posts)Trying to define the current state of the race for the Democratic nomination using individual national polls will drive you crazier than you already are just being here on DU.
Probably the best aggregate national poll picture can be seen on the RealClearPolitics composite chart here:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html
Current Averages are:
Clinton 41.6
Sanders 25.8
(Biden 20.8)
Current spread is Clinton +15.8 (an all-time low)
But of course Biden numbers are wrecking what little sense can be made of all this anyway.
It's mostly entertainment for the politically challenged imo. The state primaries and caucuses are what matter. And Biden in or out will be crucial to the fate of the party.
Anything can happen... So support your candidate and GOTV!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And also attacking both are....drumroll please..... the GOP!
Funny, that.
jkbRN
(850 posts)RandySF
(58,752 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)It's HRC 45%, Sanders 24%, Biden 19% ... of course that sample is strangely small at only 22% of the total sample. This seems to be a rather worthless effort as far as the primaries are concerned. They even included Cuomo and Gillibrand for some odd reason.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)She'll be begging for more debates soon.